Katsuro said:It's too early. Anyone who'd wind up playing Robin by the time he's introduced would be far too young now, probably not even acting yet.
Saint said:I suppose that's because they're cowards. Either that our they're stupid enough to believe the "ROBIN IS ONLY TEH CAMPY" rhetoric spewed by the unimaginative and ignorant people on these boards.
COMPO said:come on, Nolan always does something different to the characters. He'll do it with Robin. He'll make him accessible to today's standards.
I'm not going to bother arguing with someone who chooses to ignore the past twenty years of Robin stories, and who wants to cut out an integral part of the Batman mythos. You obviously don't care about the truth of the matter--if you did, you would pick up any modern Batman comic and see how Robin can be done well by talented writers who understand the character and his importance to Batman. No, you'd rather be ignorant and bleat "OMG TEH ROBIN IS TEH CAMPY!" as if "Batman & Robin" is the definitive version of Dick Grayson.El Payaso said:Or decades of coimic books showed them what a bad idea is to have a teenie colorful sidekick ruining a dark and ambiguous character.
Ruf Chiyuuk said:Would Robin fans be willing to exclude the "crimefighting" aspect of Robin out of the movie, in order to let's say... "favor" his addition to the movie? Because honestly, we don't see 13 yrs old kids kicking the rear ends of gangsters everyday.
Majik1387 said:Green?![]()
Majik1387 said:I figured that much, but why call inexperience green?![]()
Perhaps you recall responding to a post of mine where I addressed this very point, on page five. Go back and read it. Perhaps you should write it down, so you don't forget about it a second time.Ruf Chiyuuk said:I have absolutely no quarrel with Robin, but the reason why I don't want to see him in a movie is because I have difficulty believing that a 13 years old can beat grown adults... that's all. If you see Robin as being somewhat older than that ( 18-22 ) then maybe, but come on...
Saint said:Perhaps you recall responding to a post of mine where I addressed this very point, on page five. Go back and read it. Perhaps you should write it down, so you don't forget about it a second time.