Comic Book Boy
Producer/Writer/Director
- Joined
- May 28, 2004
- Messages
- 6,093
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
But what is the truly important thing that makes "authors" like Miller and Nolan alike? Similarity in events or similarity in spirit, in feel? Sure, there are a bunch of factual similarities between what happens in Nolan's Batman and what happens in Miller's Batman. But the truth behind the character in what Nolan gave us, was much more akin to different authors than Miller.
I like Miller's Batman fine, but as a more extreme take to what I'd like Batman to be. Sort of "What if Batman went really wrong"?
Nolan's Batman, early in his career as he may be, is a positive character. Miller's is completely negative. He's a psychopath still haunted by the past, but no longer inspired by it. The Batman I prefer still believes in hope, in justice, even if that is naive. Miller's (even in Year One, not just DKR) is a cynical nutjob who just projects his immeasurable anger on everyone he meets, preferably criminals he can mortally wound.
So no, I really wouldn't say Nolan's Batman is like Miller's. Nolan used some of Miller's plot points, but that's it. Otherwise the character is completely different.
Check out Miller and Aronofski's script to the "Year One" movie. You'll see how radically different the approach is. You can't relate to that Batman. He's a joyless, selfish, needlessly aggressive machine. Not a thing like Nolan's take on the character.
I agree, true.
