Official Cyclops/marsden Thread

What Will Cyclops' Fate Be In X3?

  • Dies At Alkali Lake

  • Never Faces A Life-Threatening Situation

  • Supposedly Dies Early But Returns In The Final Battle

  • Dies In The Final Battle

  • Goes On Sabbatical (after Alkali Lake)


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Zak Penn hinted at "behind the scenes politics" playing a part in Cyclops' fate in the movie - perhaps they really DID feel that James had somehow "betrayed" them by taking a part in Superman Returns. Penn also mentioned specifically in the infamous hour-long MP3 audience discussion panel that the studio execs wanted Logan and Jean to finally declare their love. To his credit, he and Simon Kinberg said they won one small battle, which was that they fought to make sure Jean never actually claimed to love Logan. But still... apparently there were some warped-ass execs at Fox who had VERY specific, VERY stupid ideas about this movie. They apparently had more control over the film than anyone who was directly involved in the production.
 
Why couldn't the studio execs be the ones to die instead of Jean and Scott and the dark Xavier?

Yes! Release the hounds!!! Or just do that Beast suggests in that little clip!
 
Bishop2 said:
Zak Penn hinted at "behind the scenes politics" playing a part in Cyclops' fate in the movie - perhaps they really DID feel that James had somehow "betrayed" them by taking a part in Superman Returns.

If they signed Singer on to do the third movie instead of dragging their asses, none of this would have happened. As I understand it, they didn't want Singer to direct it, and they didn't want Marsden to be in it. Big surprise that they both then left. What makes me wonder is, what convinced them to bring back Marsden, if even for a ridiculous little token role when they simply could have declared that "Cyke died in a terrible car accident last month"?
Penn also mentioned specifically in the infamous hour-long MP3 audience discussion panel that the studio execs wanted Logan and Jean to finally declare their love.

I think I'm going to be sick... and damn, there's no smiley to indicate sick or puking...

To his credit, he and Simon Kinberg said they won one small battle, which was that they fought to make sure Jean never actually claimed to love Logan.

At this point, any small victory would be a good one. Jean not declaring love, Cyke's death never being shown. I suppose under these circumstances that's the best that we can hope for. But it really seems like it's damage control, the studio execs already did the real damage.

But still... apparently there were some warped-ass execs at Fox who had VERY specific, VERY stupid ideas about this movie.

Any more details on what these ideas were? I hope they didn't approach the level of... artistic freedom as seen with that alternate Superman script... [shudders]

They apparently had more control over the film than anyone who was directly involved in the production.

That seems to be the case. It also seems to be a recent trend in movie-making. I can't recall many examples from the past where the suits got so involved in the creative process and managed to mess up the final product.
 
I'm surprised they'd admit there was behind the scenes politics regarding Marsden. But what they have said is just the tip of the iceberg.

It's pretty obvious by now that Ratner, Kinberg and Penn were merely puppets and Fox executives were the puppet masters. Ratner wanted to direct an X-Men film and wanted revenge against Warners for firing him from the Superman project (the film he really wanted to do) so he was the perfect choice for Fox. Matthew V left because he's an actual filmmaker not a gun for hire. I don't believe Hugh's claim that he offered to help them out once he'd walked away from the project.
 
Mother_Askani said:
I believe Lauren Shuler Donner. If James wasn't available because he was filming a rival movie, they weren't going to bend over backwards to make the shooting schedule fit James' availability.

The problem would be James' availablity for filming the two major fight sequences - the fight at the Grey's and the fight at Alcatraz. Those would have taken those most amount of time to film. More than two months.

Scott could have made it all the way to the end and been killed on Alcatraz, but scheduling James would have been a nightmare.

Add in that without Scott, Ororo becomes the leader and Halle gets a bigger part. And if Scott doesn't make it to the end of the movie, Logan is the one who has to deal with Jean so Hugh gets the big dramatic moment.


Now i'm beginning to wonder if Scott's fate would have been vastly different if he decided not to do superman.....:csad:
 
ntcrawler said:
If they signed Singer on to do the third movie instead of dragging their asses, none of this would have happened. As I understand it, they didn't want Singer to direct it, and they didn't want Marsden to be in it. Big surprise that they both then left. What makes me wonder is, what convinced them to bring back Marsden, if even for a ridiculous little token role when they simply could have declared that "Cyke died in a terrible car accident last month"?

Actually, they DID say in that same discussion and mention over on X-Verse that Fox initially ordered them that Cyclops was not to be included in the movie whatsoever. They fought to have him actually on-screen, insisting that he was too important to just leave out completely. Once they won the fight, they were given strict controls on how many MINUTES and SCENES he could appear in - amazing but true. That level of pickiness really blew my mind. After he said that on XVerse, though, he quickly said he wasn't going to talk about the decisions regarding Cyclops anymore. :( So I guess that's as much as we're gonna get on the how and why.

I can't help but wonder if maybe not including him would've been better, though... ?

Any more details on what these ideas were? I hope they didn't approach the level of... artistic freedom as seen with that alternate Superman script... [shudders]

The only other thing was that the executives were the ones who insisted that if Cyclops WAS going to be in the movie, he shouldn't be mentioned much after he's out of the picture. Penn said they lost the fight in regards to the funeral scene - they wanted a "tandem funeral" for Xavier and Scott, but Fox overruled them and said Scott had to be ignored. Penn called this "just bad storytelling."

He also mentioned that he was very proud of the line "You killed the man you loved!" because her reaction implies that, despite the studio's desires to the contrary, Jean really did love Scott.

Beyond that... well, Zak Penn's posts on the X-Verse board after opening weekend did reveal a few other things that were, at some point and for some reason, changed. He has no idea when and why these things happened, but after seeing the theatrical release he told us a few things that were surprising to him.

We can't know whether to blame Ratner or the executives for some of these things, but...

- The last time he saw/heard, Jean still "flamed up" and even made a giant Phoenix bird appear at one point. He was surprised that she never once issues forth any flames or Phoenix imagery in the final film.

- He never knew they even shot a "Beast joining the UN" ending, so that was a surprise to him. As far as he was aware, Beast joined the school as a teacher at the end, at least in the last script he and Kinberg touched.

- Penn said that the last script draft he saw had Angel suiting up in costume (with holes he cuts through the back for his wings, naturally) and participating in the final battle. He found the sudden arrival of Angel to catch his dad "rather confusing."

- He also mentioned that, towards the end of production, a bunch of new mutants were tossed in and various mutants' names were changed. He pointed out that neither Psylocke nor any other "stealth mutant" showed up in the final draft that he and Kinberg say during shooting. Also, the Porcupine-mutant was never named "Kid Omega" in the shooting script, but somehow acquired that name afterwards.

In spite of this list of specific gripes, he still went on record repeatedly as saying that he was proud of his work and felt they made a really good movie, particularly considering how fast they had to write and how many constraints were put on them.
 
Kinberg and Penn contradict everything each says which is why I don'ty trust a thing either states.

Kinberg said that execs didn't want Cyke in the movie at all so he and Penn fought furiously to have him included and the result was the only role the studio would allow for him in the movie.

Penn claims they intended to kill off Cyke from the very beginning because if Jean can kill him then she can kill anyone.

They just place the explanation most convenient at the time about it, no real mystery here.
 
it all comes down to .. they just wanted to **** with cyclops from the get go .. and when i mean "they" .. i mean EVERYONE !
 
MORAL OF THE STORY.


DON'T *****ING RUSH PRODUCTION ON A HIGHLY ANTICIPATED CONCLUSION TO A TRILOGY OF A STORY ADAPTATION OF A COMIC BOOK THAT HAS BEEN RUNNING FOR 30 YEARS!!

Tom Rothman 2 words, common sense.
 
dont you guys get tired of repeating the same crap over and over again?
 
gambitfire said:
MORAL OF THE STORY.


DON'T *****ING RUSH PRODUCTION ON A HIGHLY ANTICIPATED CONCLUSION TO A TRILOGY OF A STORY ADAPTATION OF A COMIC BOOK THAT HAS BEEN RUNNING FOR 30 YEARS!!

Tom Rothman 2 words, common sense.

Rothman doesn't give a ****. As long as the product he sells, brings in a crapload of money, he could care less about what angry fans think. He's more interested in the stockholders.

Hopefully Marvel will take back the movie rights to X-Men and bring back the quality we saw in the first two.
 
Muad'Dib said:
Kinberg said that execs didn't want Cyke in the movie at all so he and Penn fought furiously to have him included and the result was the only role the studio would allow for him in the movie.

Penn claims they intended to kill off Cyke from the very beginning because if Jean can kill him then she can kill anyone.

They just place the explanation most convenient at the time about it, no real mystery here.

I don't think those explanations actually contradict each other. Just because they fought until they were told to include him for ONLY so many scenes and ONLY so many minutes doesn't mean they were told HE MUST DIE. So they decided to kill 'im for the stated reasons. Simple.
 
xwolverine2 said:
dont you guys get tired of repeating the same crap over and over again?

No, but we do get tired of some people getting here and telling us not to do what they don't like.
This is a Cyclops' thread, and we don't mind repeating a certain things over and over again as long as they stay on topic.
 
I think the writers were probably pretty disappointed with the cut of the movie they saw in theatres. My guess is that a lot of the good stuff that they wrote (which is now seen in the animatics and deleted scenes) ended up on the cutting room floor. However, they put months of work into it and are probably legally obligated to support the picture, so they say they're proud of what they've done.

I highly doubt that any other writers brought on board would've been able to do anything more with Cyclops. Perhaps show him make a bad command decision in the Danger Room or something along those lines, just to show how much of a mess he really was.
 
Bishop2 said:
I don't think those explanations actually contradict each other. Just because they fought until they were told to include him for ONLY so many scenes and ONLY so many minutes doesn't mean they were told HE MUST DIE. So they decided to kill 'im for the stated reasons. Simple.

Agreed. And well said. The one complication is we can never get a straight answer from these guys. One moment they hint as if they had no choice. That SCott had to die because FOX said so. But another time, they turn things around and consider it a brilliant plot-twist by showing that since Jean kills him, no one is safe except Wolverine, etc.
 
Halcohol said:
I think the writers were probably pretty disappointed with the cut of the movie they saw in theatres. My guess is that a lot of the good stuff that they wrote (which is now seen in the animatics and deleted scenes) ended up on the cutting room floor. However, they put months of work into it and are probably legally obligated to support the picture, so they say they're proud of what they've done.

that's an interesting point. Yes, I agree they could hardly be considered to go on the record and declare that X3 was a piece of garbage. For one thing, they wrote it and their names are in the credits. To do so would be at least honest, but then they wouldn't be able to work again. Which I suppose in some ways would be a blessing to fans, but they sure as heck are not gonna sacrifice their own careers. Regarding all the months of work they put in, correct me if I'm wrong but I recall reading a few weeks back that the X3 script was put together in about 8 days?

I highly doubt that any other writers brought on board would've been able to do anything more with Cyclops. Perhaps show him make a bad command decision in the Danger Room or something along those lines, just to show how much of a mess he really was.

I think it depends on just how specific those parameters from management were. what we ended up getting is a sloppy story either way you look at it. Alot of elements that are not well connected with each other, if at all. I'm curious how detailed those parameters were too. Was it something vague: like Jean loves Logan, Jean kills Scott, etc. Or did they go in depth with things like Scott's torment, etc.
 
ntcrawler said:
Agreed. And well said. The one complication is we can never get a straight answer from these guys. One moment they hint as if they had no choice. That SCott had to die because FOX said so. But another time, they turn things around and consider it a brilliant plot-twist by showing that since Jean kills him, no one is safe except Wolverine, etc.

I guess that explains that they truly had no idea what they were doing on this whole script thing.
 
cyclopsblend.jpg


Cyclops blend I made that I'm rather proud of. Thought I'd share
 
ntcrawler said:
Agreed. And well said. The one complication is we can never get a straight answer from these guys. One moment they hint as if they had no choice. That SCott had to die because FOX said so. But another time, they turn things around and consider it a brilliant plot-twist by showing that since Jean kills him, no one is safe except Wolverine, etc.

We'll probably never know for sure. I was shocked that when the Alien Quadrilogy set hit, Fox forced them to edit the documentary on the Making of Alien 3 in order to remove the "whole story" on what the hell happened. And that movie came out in 1992! 12 years later, they were still quashing the truth. I imagine the same will be true with The Last Stand.
 
At least we'll all know, right? We might need to form a brotherhood or something to protect the secret of Cyclops!
 
AznBABYBANDIT said:
not just wolverine is safe... storm too!

Considering that Storm, like Hank never interacts with Jean, one of her closest friends, then it's no surprise that she's "safe"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"