• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Dark of the Moon OFFICIAL Dark of the Moon REVIEW THREAD

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have NO idea what Wheeljack looks like in the movie... but... Why doesn't he look like this?

Wheeljack_Movie_style_by_convoy81.jpg


Also... Why was it hard to get the name "Wheeljack"?


damn i like this, where did you get this from?
 
Hasbro just released a new Wheeljack toy. Wheeljack just appeared on Transformers: Prime. He's CREDITED as Que/Wheeljack in the movie even though he's only referred to as Que in one instance. So what is the legal issue of Wheeljack?

The movie is different.
For Example.
Mattel owns the ferrari brand, and in the movies(and much to fanboy approval) that's a real ferrari. I skimmed through the statment, I honestly didn't pay attention due to have little this affects me.
 
um
that design looks freakishly similar to the work in the movies
 
So is THIS what Wheeljack looks like in the movie?

Wheeljack-Robot-Mode-transformers-dark-of-moon-22055977-260-336.jpg


Wheeljack-Dark-of-the-moon_1308120324.jpg


You know... if they made Perceptor look like this I wouldn't have a problem with it... but WHEELJACK!?
 
Wheeljack looks like a scientest/inventor. I can see why they did it. They do like to take the personalities too far in the looks sometimes.

That fanmade Wheeljack pic looks cool and more G1 but he still looks like a Bayformer. I personally dont mind most the designs in the films.

35% RT. Well at least most the geek movie sites are digging this pretty strongly.

Bay will never win with critics.
 
Last edited:
So is THIS what Wheeljack looks like in the movie?

Wheeljack-Robot-Mode-transformers-dark-of-moon-22055977-260-336.jpg


Wheeljack-Dark-of-the-moon_1308120324.jpg


You know... if they made Perceptor look like this I wouldn't have a problem with it... but WHEELJACK!?
Yes. Einstein hair and mustache. He's called Que though.

Honestly Marvin, your excuse on legal rights and it pertaining to Wheeljack sounds weak.
 
That Wheeljack looks cool but he still looks like a Bayformer. I personally dont mind most the designs in the films..

Yes, it does... which I'm fine with. It still has his "classic" look to him all the while fitting it with Bay's "look." I actually don't mind the design of Optimus, Ironhide, Ratchet or even Bumblebee.... They still remind me enough of their classic looks.

Wheeljack in the movie retains NOTHING from his classic look. :csad:
 
Yes. Einstein hair and mustache. He's called Que though.

Honestly Marvin, your excuse on legal rights and it pertaining to Wheeljack sounds weak.

I guess if he's called Que I'm "fine" with it... as long as he's never, ever called Wheeljack I can pretend he's not even supposed to be him, lol.
 
Yes. Einstein hair and mustache. He's called Que though.

Honestly Marvin, your excuse on legal rights and it pertaining to Wheeljack sounds weak.

That fan design actually looks like bumblebee and sideways combined.

Honestly, the issue came out like a month ago and I wasn't around to read about it. I heard second hand so I'm not ready to really elaborate. I just gave you the base work, if you care about not looking like a mindless fan I'd say give it a look...or not.
 
There was legal problems with the names. That Nelson guy from the Bay site was pretty detailed about it.

Yes, it does... which I'm fine with. It still has his "classic" look to him all the while fitting it with Bay's "look." I actually don't mind the design of Optimus, Ironhide, Ratchet or even Bumblebee.... They still remind me enough of their classic looks.

Wheeljack in the movie retains NOTHING from his classic look. :csad:

Agreed. I havnt really seen Wheeljack/Q in DOTM except for that pic, so far hes my least favorite looking.
 
The one that sounds like a mindless fan making up ridiculous, unfounded, and false excuses is you. You are the one that brought it up and tried to prove it. Why should I research it?
 
I don't buy the legal issues. For starters, Tom DeSanto debugged the whole beetle car thing with Bumblebee. Tom DeSanto in Wizard magazine straight up said, Michael Bay wanted a camaro instead of a beetle.
 
Really? The "Volkswagen didn't want Bumblebee as a Beetle in the films because our film is to violent" thing was a BS Line?

...I'm not really shocked to find that out...
 
The camero works far better than any beetle would. The camero is a much better car anyway. WHO CARES.
 
I honestly DON'T care about that... I don't, in anyway, shape or form expect these movies to be G1 clones. I'm a G1 fan, I grew up watching the cartoons every Saturday. I would record them and rewatch them over and over...

However, now... I can barely watch them anymore because they're just... "dumb." I'm glad that those shows introduced me to a world that became far more than an extended toy commercial but I don't put the show on a pedestal.

Now... the G1 (and pre G1) related comics? That's another story. :p
 
The one that sounds like a mindless fan making up ridiculous, unfounded, and false excuses is you. You are the one that brought it up and tried to prove it. Why should I research it?

Ferrari was the problem with licensing I believe, it was said they named him Dino after the son of the Ferrari Founder. The DOTM toys, game, comic and Novel all have him labeled as Mirage. I dont think hes even a Ferrari for his the toy. They never said for sure if it was the case for Wheeljack. But like Mirage/Dino he is called Wheeljack in everything else merch wise. Dont even think they released toys for him. So may have been the same thing. Dont know 100%.
 
Chris says the parents have little more than a cameo early in the film. Considering how much groaning I've heard about their presence in this film I wonder what's really going down.

yeah it was really only a cameo, 2 scenes maybe all based around their holiday truck and sam getting a job/gf

there was one slightly funny part with them, but they didnt get much screentime at all.
 
that einstein thing was meant to be wheeljack? didnt even pick that up, but now it kinda makes sense in some ways - i guess the name que is a homage to Q from 007?
 
first you say this
The one that sounds like a mindless fan making up ridiculous, unfounded, and false excuses is you. You are the one that brought it up and tried to prove it. Why should I research it?
then in your very next post, this
I don't buy the legal issues. For starters, Tom DeSanto debugged the whole beetle car thing with Bumblebee. Tom DeSanto in Wizard magazine straight up said, Michael Bay wanted a camaro instead of a beetle.

I simply say, look into it, for I fear you may come off sounding like a fan boy with his fingers in his ears, I couldn't care less either way if you think they should have went with one name or the other. It doesn't even look like the character so as a fan boy you should be rejoicing.

Really? The "Volkswagen didn't want Bumblebee as a Beetle in the films because our film is to violent" thing was a BS Line?

...I'm not really shocked to find that out...

The First movie, if you didn't notice is all GM cars, this is the first installment to branch out and feature non GM cars as heroes or characters. I know they tried something with sideway's in TF2 but that was after the fact.

Volkswagon beetle isn't GM.

and like you said, who cares.
no one that Watches TF prime, that's who.
 
Devin Faraci review.
http://www.badassdigest.com/2011/06/28/movie-review-transformers-dark-of-the-moon-is-terrible
I don’t hate Transformers: Dark of the Moon. It’s no Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides, for one. And about twelve hours after seeing it the movie has begun completely evaporating from my mind. But I don’t understand how anyone can actually like the movie, and it’s hard for me to tell you it’s worth any of your time. I want to be flip and say you should buy a ticket for something else and sneak into Dark of the Moon at the film’s 90 minute mark, but I can’t even recommend that. And who am I kidding anyway – this is a movie of inevitable badness that you will inevitably see.

Then there’s Optimus Prime. Why are we supposed to like this guy anyway? He’s a ****** leader – he spends half the film moping about his mistakes, and I personally blame him completely for the destruction of Chicago – and he’s **** in a fight. Once again he gets his ass handed to him in this movie. The only thing Prime is any good at is delivering semi-sensical platitudes. Honestly, **** this character.

Thats some bs, Optimus wrecks everyone. He hands each decipticon their ass in each movie.
 
wow there is so much anger in some of these I sort of get tired. Sort of, i like anger as an emotion for the most part, but negativity yeah that **** brings me down.

What i need to do is stop reading an just go see the damn thing
 
Didn't say he wasn't entitled to HIS OPINOIN, I said at what point is this just some person stating something he doesn't like. .

Please show me where in my reply to you that I stated that you feel one cant have their own opinion?? And what i put in bold that you post, leaves me to believe that You dont understand anothers opinion. I mean he did state something he doesnt like, that's the point. Its his opinion-so because he stated it, does it not make it a valid opinion or something; i'm just not understanding that part, aren't we all stating what we like and dont like????

He seed to think that it made no sense for a ROBOT to have such a thing and I objectively deconstructed his point by way of consistency. Why now? Why is it ok for Robot aliens to have a bunch of needless human parts but once hair design is introduced it makes no sense?

why give them unnecessary characteristics indeed.

again as i stated, and "Vileone" you can correct me if i misread you wrong....he is stating NOT THAT A robot cant have, but why does TRANSFORMERS need to have, if they do not have them any other place else in the source material. Simple as that.


Secondly, the design construction is amazing...but that's my opinion
funny how that works.


and lastly..unless i'm wrong, your opinion I never thought other posters had an issue with (including me), but YOUR opinion on others who dislike the film or have something negitative to say about the whole franchise in general is what some seem to wonder about.
 

I like Faraci, but he spends most of that review singling out the very aspects even the negative reviews say the film does well...pretty much his usual style.
After all the verbal fights he got into with his colleagues leading up to the release, i'm not really surprised. I do think he does present some interesting points though.

Thats some bs, Optimus wrecks everyone. He hands each decipticon their ass in each movie.

after the first movie, he was too so and so
the second, he was something else
and now it's something else.
even charlie sheen would consider this a lose lose situation.
 
Between this movie and GL, fanboys are outright ready to murder people over it from the way the reviews are talking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,963
Messages
22,044,592
Members
45,843
Latest member
JoeSoap
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"