People Say Venom Can't Have His Own Film

[ht001]

I think they should change venom because over time he would get bigger and stronger, I don't think it's a big deal if he refers to himself as we or not.

 

[CaptainClown]

too true Best post of this crappy thread

I dunno blader and sun_down have made really good posts I can't decide which one is my favorite

 

[Turtle-Man]

Guess what? I post an idea, and ask for suggestions. What you end up doing is flaming me without helping me in any way whatsoever. Quit acting like ******s. I posted a concept, and I want to hear how I can improve it. Why don't you think for a moment, and come up with something I can do to make the story better. Instead of doing what is right, all of you end up whining like little children about a Venom film not happening. Get your heads on straight, and give me some CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, not just a blatant flaming.

Carnage sucks. Give me some credit for trying to branch away from that "Carnage is going to be teh villain" cliche.

 

[Green Goblin 1964]

Guess what? I post an idea, and ask for suggestions. What you end up doing is flaming me without helping me in any way whatsoever. Quit acting like ******s. I posted a concept, and I want to hear how I can improve it. Why don't you think for a moment, and come up with something I can do to make the story better. Instead of doing what is right, all of you end up whining like little children about a Venom film not happening. Get your heads on straight, and give me some CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, not just a blatant flaming.

Carnage sucks. Give me some credit for trying to branch away from that "Carnage is going to be teh villain" cliche.

WTH are you talking about? I gave you suggestions and so did CaptainClown and when we give it to you turn it down, that's not our fault that's your concieted minds fault. And everyone's right you don't take criticism well and you take it the wrong way. You won't make it anywhere like that. Your the ****** not us, your the fool not us, your Turtle-Man

Nothing to say now do you?

And I still don't know why this isn't in the fanfiction section...

 

[CaptainClown]

WTH are you talking about? I gave you suggestions and so did CaptainClown and when we give it to you turn it down, that's not our fault that's your concieted minds fault. And everyone's right you don't take criticism well and you take it the wrong way. You won't make it anywhere like that. Your the ****** not us, your the fool not us, your Turtle-Man

Nothing to say now do you?

And I still don't know why this isn't in the fanfiction section...

I was mentioned =)

we could make a huge list of suggestions and we didn't even bring up carnage

 

[Turtle-Man]

I was mentioned =)

we could make a huge list of suggestions and we didn't even bring up carnage

Do it. I want suggestions that'll improve this concept.

 

[CaptainClown]

What you concept needs is a huge overhaul and first the acception that your idea is flawed and does not appeal to the vast majority. Thats what it should do rather then what you think is cool. The sooner you accept it the sooner you'll get well.

First suggestion

If you plan on keeping Eddie Brock (topher grace's interpretation) then you might want to think of a better way of bringing him back that doesn't involve him losing his memory.

Have the movie SM3 actually affect this spin-off since that is what you are aiming for. An example would be Gwen Stacey doesn't acknowledge him she doesn't even really know who he is.

Since spiderman-3 portrayed venom so poorly you need to show him as a true villain before you show him as an anti hero.

Shocker would just get laughs, the name just screams a sex act. The movie could be deeper with the symbiote as his antagonist and who he views is Spiderman. Unfortunately you don't under that concept of role reversal so until you do don't write anything about Spider-man. (and no.. it won't become a spider-man movie is Spidey is not focused upon which is simple.

There those are my first suggestions and chances are you won't agree with any of them.

 

[Turtle-Man]

What you concept needs is a huge overhaul and first the acception that your idea is flawed and does not appeal to the vast majority. Thats what it should do rather then what you think is cool. The sooner you accept it the sooner you'll get well.

First suggestion

If you plan on keeping Eddie Brock (topher grace's interpretation) then you might want to think of a better way of bringing him back that doesn't involve him losing his memory.

Have the movie SM3 actually affect this spin-off since that is what you are aiming for. An example would be Gwen Stacey doesn't acknowledge him she doesn't even really know who he is.

Since spiderman-3 portrayed venom so poorly you need to show him as a true villain before you show him as an anti hero.

Shocker would just get laughs, the name just screams a sex act. The movie could be deeper with the symbiote as his antagonist and who he views is Spiderman. Unfortunately you don't under that concept of role reversal so until you do don't write anything about Spider-man. (and no.. it won't become a spider-man movie is Spidey is not focused upon which is simple.

There those are my first suggestions and chances are you won't agree with any of them.

I tried that. It involved Gwen hating him, him being lost, and him killing himself (along with the symbiote) at the end of the film. I want to see a sequel, though. It went so dark it probably would've gotten an R rating. PG-13 is what I'm aiming for.

 

[CaptainClown]

If you had blood and gore lots of sex and drug use and excessive cussing you missed the ball completely thats what R stands for.

If you had him hating himself lost and killing himself again you missed the whole idea of a superhero movie. This really isn't a drama as it should be an action flick. I mean your not trying to make a Donnie Darko and really depress the audience. Hell you have to get people to sympathize with him but from SM3 many people don't like that.

 

[Green Goblin 1964]

Another thing I was thinking that would stay in continuity is that Dr. Connors still has a sample of the symbiote, maybe it's possible that Eddie did survive but the symbiote did not. Leaving him vengeance and anger so Eddie is set out for the symbiote to ruin the lives of those who have humiliated him. He gets Dr. Connors sample but is left with the choice should he or should he not put it on because unlike movie 3 he did not have the choice now he does. He takes the risks and the black symbiote takes him over.

Make Peter the main person Eddie/Venom is after and he tries to make his life a living hell. Also make it as if Eddie is the innocent one and Peter is the villain of the story when he is not but we are looking at it as how Eddie is looking at Peter and how Eddie thinks of Peter.

That's just a few....let me guess your going to say that there all bad and yours is the best right....predictable

 

[Turtle-Man]

If you had blood and gore lots of sex and drug use and excessive cussing you missed the ball completely thats what R stands for.

If you had him hating himself lost and killing himself again you missed the whole idea of a superhero movie. This really isn't a drama as it should be an action flick. I mean your not trying to make a Donnie Darko and really depress the audience. Hell you have to get people to sympathize with him but from SM3 many people don't like that.

That's not what I meant.

 

[Turtle-Man]

Another thing I was thinking that would stay in continuity is that Dr. Connors still has a sample of the symbiote, maybe it's possible that Eddie did survive but the symbiote did not. Leaving him vengeance and anger so Eddie is set out for the symbiote to ruin the lives of those who have humiliated him. He gets Dr. Connors sample but is left with the choice should he or should he not put it on because unlike movie 3 he did not have the choice now he does. He takes the risks and the black symbiote takes him over.

Make Peter the main person Eddie/Venom is after and he tries to make his life a living hell. Also make it as if Eddie is the innocent one and Peter is the villain of the story when he is not but we are looking at it as how Eddie is looking at Peter and how Eddie thinks of Peter.

That's just a few....let me guess your going to say that there all bad and yours is the best right....predictable

Isn't that what I did?

 

[Green Goblin 1964]

Isn't that what I did?

Yeah, but it wasn't the way I thought of it....like I have a different vision of it....hard to explain. Are you going to make a second draft?

 

[Sun_Down]

That's the problem. If that were the case, it would be a Spider-Man film, not a Venom film. A Venom spinoff can not revolve around Spider-Man.

Guess what? I post an idea, and ask for suggestions. What you end up doing is flaming me without helping me in any way whatsoever. Quit acting like ******s. I posted a concept, and I want to hear how I can improve it. Why don't you think for a moment, and come up with something I can do to make the story better. Instead of doing what is right, all of you end up whining like little children about a Venom film not happening. Get your heads on straight, and give me some CONSTRUCTIVE criticism, not just a blatant flaming.

Carnage sucks. Give me some credit for trying to branch away from that "Carnage is going to be teh villain" cliche.

Keep calling us "******s". That'll surely to get you some constructive criticism.

You come in here with this idea that you've supposedly talked about with Sony (which I, for one, don't buy for a nanosecond) and tell us we're stupid for not liking it. And when you act as though Sony is depending on you to write this project with you describe as inevitable and urgent, how do you expect us to not laugh it off.?

If you've got a fan fiction idea, post it in the Fan Fiction forum and you'll get some real criticism. But you've presented this thing in such a ridiculous fashion that you can't expect us to take it seriously.

 

[Green Goblin 1964]

Keep calling us "******s". That'll surely to get you some constructive criticism.

You come in here with this idea that you've supposedly talked about with Sony (which I, for one, don't buy for a nanosecond) and tell us we're stupid for not liking it. And when you act as though Sony is depending on you to write this project with you describe as inevitable and urgent, how do you expect us to not laugh it off.?

If you've got a fan fiction idea, post it in the Fan Fiction forum and you'll get some real criticism. But you've presented this thing in such a ridiculous fashion that you can't expect us to take it seriously.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! And the winner is....Sun_Down! You win a cookie

 

[Sun_Down]

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! And the winner is....Sun_Down! You win a cookie

 

[Turtle-Man]

Keep calling us "******s". That'll surely to get you some constructive criticism.

You come in here with this idea that you've supposedly talked about with Sony (which I, for one, don't buy for a nanosecond) and tell us we're stupid for not liking it. And when you act as though Sony is depending on you to write this project with you describe as inevitable and urgent, how do you expect us to not laugh it off.?

If you've got a fan fiction idea, post it in the Fan Fiction forum and you'll get some real criticism. But you've presented this thing in such a ridiculous fashion that you can't expect us to take it seriously.

When did I ever mentioned I talked with Sony? My screen name on Messenger IS Sony. My idea is worth more than the Carnage idea. Thanks for making dumb assumptions. As I reported in the original post, the conversation involved myself and The_Ones. Nowhere did I say it involved Sony. Are you saying anyone named Sony is automatically affiliated with Sony Corporation? I think you just drowned yourself in your own ignorance, pal.

 

[Green Goblin 1964]

When did I ever mentioned I talked with Sony? My screen name on Messenger IS Sony. My idea is worth more than the Carnage idea. Thanks for making dumb assumptions. As I reported in the original post, the conversation involved myself and The_Ones. Nowhere did I say it involved Sony. Are you saying anyone named Sony is automatically affiliated with Sony Corporation? I think you just drowned yourself in your own ignorance, pal.

OMG! Man, that means nothing coming from the person who WROTE THE F***ING SCRIPT!

And you my friend are conceited and drowned in that. Your in your own little world now.


I still think this belongs in the Fan Fiction section if not locked.

 

[CaptainClown]

it is def making me laugh.

 

[Green Goblin 1964]

it is def making me laugh.

Met too, and pissing me off.....t:t:t:

 

[CaptainClown]

ya i know what you mean

 

[Sun_Down]

When did I ever mentioned I talked with Sony? My screen name on Messenger IS Sony. My idea is worth more than the Carnage idea. Thanks for making dumb assumptions. As I reported in the original post, the conversation involved myself and The_Ones. Nowhere did I say it involved Sony. Are you saying anyone named Sony is automatically affiliated with Sony Corporation? I think you just drowned yourself in your own ignorance, pal.

You say that you talked to "The Ones" without explaining who that is and then start every line with "Sony says" without explaining that that's you (were you just talking to yourself, by the way?), what other assumption could one make?

 

[Green Goblin 1964]

You say that you talked to "The Ones" without explaining who that is and then start every line with "Sony says" without explaining that that's you (were you just talking to yourself, by the way?), what other assumption could one make?

LOL I wouldn't be shocked LOLt:

 

[Turtle-Man]

LOL I wouldn't be shocked LOLt:

I deleted The_Ones' responses to make it easier to read. Obviously, you two are stupid.

1: I said I was having a conversation with The_Ones. That obviously means I was the one speaking in that transcript. It's common sense.

2: The_Ones is another member of SHH. Duh. I'm posting on the SHH. That should've been obvious.

Use your brains, people.

 

[Green Goblin 1964]

I deleted The_Ones' responses to make it easier to read. Obviously, you two are stupid.

1: I said I was having a conversation with The_Ones. That obviously means I was the one speaking in that transcript. It's common sense.

2: The_Ones is another member of SHH. Duh. I'm posting on the SHH. That should've been obvious.

Use your brains, people.

That means alot coming from you