Thebumwhowalks
Superhero
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2010
- Messages
- 5,377
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
That's because he intentionally no-sold it.
"When we started shooting it had been tacitly agreed that the version of the film that we had agreed upon was the version without voiceover narration. It was a ****ing nightmare. I thought that the film had worked without the narration. But now I was stuck re-creating that narration. And I was obliged to do the voiceovers for people that did not represent the director's interests. I went kicking and screaming to the studio to record it."
"What I remember more than anything else when I see Blade Runner is not the 50 nights of shooting in the rain, but the voiceover ... I was still obliged to work for these clowns that came in writing one bad voiceover after another.
Aye, but thinking about it now, the funny thing is, that is exactly why the performance suits the film, because Dekard has been brought back to work under the exact same circumstances, and carries the same attitude to his work throughout the film.
I prefer the cut without the vo, but I can see why some folk prefer it, they like that downtrodden PI vibe it brings, and I can also see why I didn't mind it back in ye olden pre-DC days.


