I often wonder if part of the success of the Fast and Furious franchise is down to it being the most multicultural blockbuster series. I think just about every major race is represented in the film, especially the last couple of films.
I often wonder if part of the success of the Fast and Furious franchise is down to it being the most multicultural blockbuster series. I think just about every major race is represented in the film, especially the last couple of films.
They've inched into that with an asian woman for Watson in Elementary and making Moriarty [blackout]a woman who used Irene Adler as an alias[/blackout] (blacked out for those who don't know). Although I'm not sure if an Orthodox Jewish Daredevil makes any sense I don't think it would be a problem necessarily unless it interfered with him being Daredevil.
In terms of adaptation, if the race of the character matters, don't change it. I really can't see Bruce Wayne ever being black, and Black Panther would never be white.
They've inched into that with an asian woman for Watson in Elementary and making Moriarty [blackout]a woman who used Irene Adler as an alias[/blackout] (blacked out for those who don't know). Although I'm not sure if an Orthodox Jewish Daredevil makes any sense I don't think it would be a problem necessarily unless it interfered with him being Daredevil.
This is true, but since I can't tell if you're for or against this, I'll start by saying I think it's okay to change a character's race/gender/religion to a certain extent.Yeah, I was joking. My point was that it's not about racism, but changing the character IS changing the character whether its race, gender, religion or ..... fatness.
Okay, well are you saying it's fine to mess with character traits or you prefer they stick to it as much as possible?What about messing with other traits besides race? Can we make Sherlock Holmes morbidly obese, and make Daredevil an orthodox Jew? Just throwing it out there. Don't hate, appreciate.![]()
listen man I don't have any ill will here but first off, I would never do that, that's terribly different to read, and second, if other posters can look past my wording issues then I don't know why you can't be a little more reasonable.Maybe I can put it context for you, Tanin. I'll write about something important then use ALL CAPS TO DISCUSS IT AND SEE HOW WELL EVERYONE ENJOYS READING THIS.
WHAT DO YOU THINK SO FAR? DO YOU FIND THIS EASIER AND MORE RELAXED TO READ OR DOES IT ANNOY THE **** OUT OF YOU YET?
I don't know. It depends how integral certain traits are to a character's identity. I think sometimes it works (making Kingpin black) and other times it doesn't (like when they thought of recasting James Bond as an American in the 70's after Sean Connery left).
Hyde is right. Bruce Wayne can't be anything other than a white male. I would even go as far as to say that it has to be an actor of Anglo-Saxon descent.
I think characters like Superman, James Bond, etc, are too ingrained in pop culture to have their races changed. The supporting cast is fair game however in most cases. Miss Moneypenny is now of Jamaican decent, Perry White is African American, as is Electro in AMS2, there's really few rules to say these characters couldn't be played by people of non-European decent. I've heard rumour of Denzel Washington as Lex Luthor which would blow my freakin' mind if it turned out true.
If that were true, he wouldn't be named Sherlock Holmes and have a partner surnamed Watson.Well actually I think part of the reason they did that, was to make it less obvious that they were trying to capitalize / rip off of Sherlock.
I hope you're being facetious. This is beyond absurd.Hyde is right. Bruce Wayne can't be anything other than a white male. I would even go as far as to say that it has to be an actor of Anglo-Saxon descent.
It's an inherent part of the Wayne family that they are of a WASP origin thus the billions of dollars the estate has. That wouldn't be able to be replicated by a black, Asian or even a white Hispanic actor, even someone who is white but not of any Germanic descent wouldn't be appropriate. There would be a loss of authenticity when approaching the character in my view.
That's who the character is. I had the same view when it came to Kaneda and the rest of the characters and setting of Akira too. Turning them into white characters and changing the setting to Manhattan completely undermines the significance of the characters, story and setting.
I'm not. How is it absurd? Go ahead and explain yourself instead of just dropping that little comment without bothering to explain how you think turning Wayne into an African-American man wouldn't inherently change the character. That's far more absurd. I hold the exact same view when it comes to Akira by the way with its Japanese characters and settings unless you think that turning all the characters white and then changing the setting to Manhattan doesn't change the story either.I hope you're being facetious. This is beyond absurd.
I'm not. How is it absurd? Go ahead and explain yourself instead of just dropping that little comment without bothering to explain how you think turning Wayne into an African-American man wouldn't inherently change the character. That's far more absurd. I hold the exact same view when it comes to Akira by the way with its Japanese characters and settings unless you think that turning all the characters white and then changing the setting to Manhattan doesn't change the story either.
Go ahead and explain yourself.
Only on the internet...Trolls are not a part of American folklore.