MakeMinesMarvel
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2013
- Messages
- 2,450
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
How many full trailers have ever bothered with commentary let alone teasers?
Could've been a trailer for a trailer. Different strokes for different companies.
How many full trailers have ever bothered with commentary let alone teasers?
Different strokes for different companies.
Which would be relevant if it had been done previously. There's no precedence for it.
Wasn't the complaint that they weren't talking? What's the problem?
Wasn't the complaint that they weren't talking? What's the problem?
As a sci-fi film it looks great. But as a Fantastic Four film, it looks terrible.
What does this even mean?? Everyone keeps acting like we have gotten a good Fantastic Four movie before or something...
What does this even mean?? Everyone keeps acting like we have gotten a good Fantastic Four movie before or something...
It means the looks and tone feels like nothing like a great Fantastic Four film should be like, the Kirby/Lee comics which are considered its heyday and most popular run.What does this even mean?? Everyone keeps acting like we have gotten a good Fantastic Four movie before or something...
What does this even mean?? Everyone keeps acting like we have gotten a good Fantastic Four movie before or something...
Just because a movie is a good film does not automatically mean that it is a good interpretation of the source material.
It means the looks and tone feels like nothing like a great Fantastic Four film should be like, the Kirby/Lee comics which are considered its heyday and most popular run.
This makes no sense. We don't know if the film will be good or not until it comes out. You can't judge a movie on a short teaser.No actually their anger comes from NOT GETTING a good Fantastic Four movie before...and not seeing much of a change from that.
It means the looks and tone feels like nothing like a great Fantastic Four film should be like, the Kirby/Lee comics which are considered its heyday and most popular run.
Interesting teaser. They clearly want to distance themselves from the previous mess they made, obvious Nolan tone, whether that turns out to be good or bad, we shall see.
From comments I've read its clearly not something actual F4 fans were hoping/expecting though so maybe knowing little of the source material in this case helps me, but it at least made me interested in the F4 for once.
I'd say its better than the Ant-man teaser but below Avengers and Star Wars.
I'll give it a 7 for now but could go either way still.

No actually their anger comes from NOT GETTING a good Fantastic Four movie before...and not seeing much of a change from that.
What does this even mean?? Everyone keeps acting like we have gotten a good Fantastic Four movie before or something...
This doesn't even feel like Byrne or Waid.
Although people keep mentioning how "critically acclaimed" Jon Hickmans run is. Maybe Johnny will get his guts dissected or whatever that was all about.
This makes no sense. We don't know if the film will be good or not until it comes out. You can't judge a movie on a short teaser.
Can you be specific? They have the same powers and they're still a family presumably. It does have a little darker in tone because they're trying to differentiate from the other movies.
Except the tone wasn't the problem with those movies.
It was the poor writing, direction, and effects.
Make those better, keep the same tone, and you've got good/great FF movies.
There was no reason to change the ****ing tone this drastically except the studio/director willed it.
Oh hey, wasn't it Matthew Vaughan, I think a producer or whatever on this movie, who said people were tired of "grim and gritty" superhero movies?
And now some people are praising this for looking grim and gritty?
The world is just awesome. Boomdeyada boomdeyada