Tetragrammaton
Civilian
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2006
- Messages
- 625
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
You make WHF seem unbiased
The illogical thing to do would to be doing what the Nintendo fanboys are doing: acting like they know the game better than the reviewers who actually played the game.jaydawg said:You make WHF seem logical.
And how does the possible actions of another person affect you while you're busy playing a game you like?Spidey-Bat said:It makes me mad because someone is going to go on GameSpot, see the score and believe the petty complaints ruin the game and pass on it.
Addendum said:And how does the possible actions of another person affect you while you're busy playing a game you like?
First, Gamespot agrees with you that it's great, hence the "great" score.Spidey-Bat said:Because I find it sad that someone will miss out playing a great game such as Twilight Princess because Jeff over exaggerated on it's weaknesses.
WhatsHisFace said:First, Gamespot agrees with you that it's great, hence the "great" score.
Second, no one's going to decide not to buy the game because Gamespot gave it almost a 9/10.
Wahahaha!slinger said:
I really doubt an already widely viewed website like Gamespot would do that.Its just a way to generate traffic/attention. You glance at the scores and see one site's score sticks out from the rest and check it out. If someone reads that review and only that review well then they deserve not to play the game.
When I finish a game, all I think about is what I should play next.Spidey-Bat said:I don't either. But when after I have played and am thinking back on how awesome the last dungeon was or the difficulty that last boss was, I will think that someone is missing out because fat Jeff didn't talk about how fun and exciting the game is in his review.
Tetragrammaton said:Is anyone else tired of this pious nonsense?