Kane52630
FOREVER⊙DILATING⊙EYE
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2009
- Messages
- 124,037
- Reaction score
- 63,589
- Points
- 218
Its not really a motorcycle ad, but I can see why, some people would think that at first, especially if they don't know Raccoon City.

Its not really a motorcycle ad, but I can see why, some people would think that at first, especially if they don't know Raccoon City.
They don't bomb. They are done on the cheap and make big money. I like them but I know what they are and I don't think this is going to be the end of the series.
With Milla as Alice? Probably. But they will either reboot or spin off sequels at some point.
yeah they dont bomb the largest budget a resident evil has gotten was 65 million
Upon finally watching Alien and Aliens, I think they had a blueprint on how to make this film franchise superior to what it currently is.I would love a reboot that was closer to the source material and didn't have stupid made-up characters as the lead. Don't get me wrong I would never expect a Resident Evil movie to be a masterpiece but it can be better than this trash series.
Even if he wasn't the one screwing up, the games story is a mess.I really think Resident Evil writes itself, and Paul WS Anderson screwed it up.
Lickers don't evolve either, that farter went up in size in the movie.And now I'm going to go full nerd on you and nit pick like a mofo. The Licker was not created by the t-virus, it was created by the g-virus in Resident Evil 2 so it shouldn't have even been in that first movie. And also the Licker is not some main boss, they aren't even as tough as the Hunters in Resident Evil 1996.
And here I thought the director actually plays these games.This was basically just a starring vehicle for Anderson's wife, I don't think anyone involved really cared about the games or characters.
I just don't get why he kept the characters from the Mortal Kombat games as the leads of the film but didn't do that with Resident Evil?
I wouldn't have complained about a massive amount of changes but just keep the freakin characters and the general story.
And now I'm going to go full nerd on you and nit pick like a mofo. The Licker was not created by the t-virus, it was created by the g-virus in Resident Evil 2 so it shouldn't have even been in that first movie. And also the Licker is not some main boss, they aren't even as tough as the Hunters in Resident Evil 1996.
I just don't get why he kept the characters from the Mortal Kombat games as the leads of the film but didn't do that with Resident Evil?
I wouldn't have complained about a massive amount of changes but just keep the freakin characters and the general story.
And now I'm going to go full nerd on you and nit pick like a mofo. The Licker was not created by the t-virus, it was created by the g-virus in Resident Evil 2 so it shouldn't have even been in that first movie. And also the Licker is not some main boss, they aren't even as tough as the Hunters in Resident Evil 1996.
I can't believe I'm saying this but I've been catching up on the RE movies recently and I've made it to #5 and....believe it or not I actually for the most part enjoy these movies. They know exactly what they are and don't try to be anything else. The only one i thought was legitimately BAD was #2. That movie was just plain silly and the action wasn't even that good. But I thought #1 was legitimately good and 3 and 4 were very fun movies with some kickass action scenes. I'm actually....kind of looking forward to this "Final Chapter" now.
*Dodges rocks and tomatoes*
I think the first movie is a decent one, or at least has swell ideas.
The laser grid trap was too much though.
Opinions and all, but I think 1 and 2 are the only really decent ones. RE at least set up a universe, despite using very little from the games. The second is full of fan service, but they still shove Alice to the forefront. After that I barely remember them. I know the last has Leon and Barry....or they looked like them anyway.