TheCorpulent1
SHAZAM!
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
- Messages
- 154,474
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Yeah, Thanos is coming back in Guardians of the Galaxy in a couple months.
Ugh. Oh god, horrible thought.......Bishop? Bishop who should be dead and rotting instead of being an Avenger. I can see that baby-killer saying that.

Stonewall, Absorbing Man's kid from Secret Warriors.
Nova is leading the charge so he's out.
I'd be psyched to see him make Avenger but why would he need armor?
Forge be gone insane and dead. Something bout Storm's nether region makes men go crazy, even one's who admired her from afar like Bishop.I've been cruisin' character profiles. Truthfully it looks a lot like Forge.


![]()
Look at this! Could our new mystery man really be Garrison Kane?
Not in detail and not good enough. All he says is ''Cable/Scott you gotta trust me!" Never once does he actually stop and logically talk it out with them. Dude HAS to die and a forever death at that.He did sorta explain his reasonings.
She causes his future by a widespread disaster due to her powers, which turns people against mutants. =l
Though, I for one would be okay with Bishop. I loved him back in the day and hate his current staus quo. If joining this ragtag band of Avengers is what gets him back on the path of being a hero then I'm all for it.

He'll be dead before he's right about Hope. Seriously, there's a million ways going about making sure his future doesn't happen. Never should his first option been kill a baby.Wait till it's revealed that he's been right about Hope all along and HE saves mutantkind![]()
He's dead Jim. Not a bad suggestion though.
He did sorta explain his reasonings.
She causes his future by a widespread disaster due to her powers, which turns people against mutants. =l
Would you kill Hitler as a kid to prevent the deaths to come type of scenerio. It's a logical question, just hard for us to accept it having not 'experienced' bishop's future.
When's the last time you saw X-Men stop and logically talk anything out? They're *****ebags, the whole lot of 'em; they shoot first and ask questions never.Not in detail and not good enough. All he says is ''Cable/Scott you gotta trust me!" Never once does he actually stop and logically talk it out with them. Dude HAS to die and a forever death at that.
When's the last time you saw X-Men stop and logically talk anything out? They're *****ebags, the whole lot of 'em; they shoot first and ask questions never.


Then Cable explains that she not only saves Mutantkind but millions of humans as well. Who ya gonna believe, Bishop; a cop from 80 years into the future with a personal vendetta that doesn't care who he kills i.e. the whole freakin' world and a baby just so he can have an easier life? Or Cable, a soldier from 2000 years into the future who is sacrificing selflessly to save the world even at the expense of his own life?
Go Cable! Kill Bishop!
Wha? Pretty sure Bishop is trying to prevent mutants from being rounded up and enslaved.
That's a very small part of it. It's a very very personal vendetta. It's the fact that his grandma and sister were killed. He blames society for his loss, and blames Hope for society. He couldn't care less about the other mutants...obviously. He attacked Forge, The X-Men, X-Force, Cable, shot the Prof. in the head, and even teamed up with Stryfe to take over the age of Apocalypse. He cares nothing for everyone else. Not to mention that intentionally destroys the rest of the world simply so he could accomplish his goal.
I agree that trying to save your family is legit, but c'mon. Going back to the Hitler comment, I see a lot of similarities between the two using society as scape goat to justify you're own personal agenda.
ColossalSpoons said:Wait till it's revealed that he's been right about Hope all along and HE saves mutantkind
Mark the time and date. I called it!
