Actually it usually just *****e bags that proclaim to know everything, and consider their opinion to be fact. If the actual scores the game gets are higher than what someone would expect, that person would then resort to the lame ass "company X paid for those reviews", when, if that were the case, why wouldn't they pay for high reviews on all their exclusives? If they did that they'd just pay for all of them, but Lair smashes that theory into the ground. As long as you agree with the village idiots you're ok, otherwise you're proclaimed ******ed, a demon from hell, and various other pathetic insults. If I just agreed all the time, then I wouldn't be messed with at all. It's not like my IQ would change, but I'd be like-minded, therefore intelligent. WHF said himself we rib each other, and this is a game forum, so who cares?
And get over yourself, GFreeman, please. Before you say Resistance is mediocre, put "I think" in front, so you don't look like a total ass. The majority of game reviewers AND gamers thought Resistance rocked, so just shut it. And you're a fanboy in denial, you think the PS3 is a glorofied paperweight, the Wii is a fad, and yet you have nothing bad to say about the 360? If those are the facts I guess you'd have to be a 360 fanboy, because what sane person would pick a paperwight or a fad over a real console with great exclusives?
Your argument is hilarious. "If a company is willing to spend some of their money, why wouldn't they be willing to spend a massive amount MORE of their money? Ha, I win!". Do you mouth breathers really think this stuff up on your own? There has to be some sort of comedy mailing list you're all subscribed to that feeds you this garbage. Hey, EA didn't buy Bioware, that's bull****. I mean, come on, think about it, if they were going to buy one company, why wouldn't they buy
all companies? Did they? Hell no. So obviously they didn't buy Bioware. lulz I win!1
Christ. And no, if I'm a fanboy for anything, it's the PC at the moment. I pretty much outright hate the 360 for crapping out on me, I owned a Wii for a while before getting tired of it, and as a matter of fact, the PS3 is currently the only console I have any interest in owning in the near future. And this is exactly what I mean, so thanks for proving my point. You and the rest of the extra chromosomes club are so insecure about someone disagreeing with you that you write
everyone off as a "fanboy" for whatever console you're currently opposing. I've basically pissed all over the 360 for a solid year now, but I'm a 360 fanboy because I recognized that Resistance was trash? Ha, whatever man. The sad thing is, I think this is probably more a reflection on your mentality than anything else. You see the whole world in terms of a console war and all the "sides".
*fap fap fap* uh, Resistance, oh yeah...*fap fap fap*...ugh, oh gawd, yeah baby, just like that Resistance, yeah, oh yeah, oh I'm so ****ing close, uh...*fap fap fap*...uuuuGHGHHH!!!.....oh god, oh god, oh god....damn Resistance. You are tight baby. Damn....that was nice.
I can't believe you're still trying to argue with people. Give it a rest kid. Look at yourself. You just tried to counter "Resistance reviews were bought and paid for"...by listing Resistance reviews and posting a pie chart. Come on. Have some self respect.
Resistance is a really good console FPS, regardless of what you guys may think. Seriously. :\
Horse ****. It was a ****ty game then, and it's a ****ty game now. Orange Box is a good FPS. Crysis is a good FPS. Resistance is just Insomniac giving everyone a mediocrity *******. It's just as wretched as all those cookie cutter WWII shooters.
Except everybody else in this thread?
And honestly, GFreeman, you haven't made a single argument as to why Resistance didn't deserve decent reviews.
I've made them, pay attention to help yourself avoid embarrassing situations like this. It was a boring, mediocre, derivative game that couldn't compete with a first person shooter released on a last gen console
in 2001. It was an awful amalgam of cliches and Insomniac's short comings as a developer, cooked up in the ovens of video game hell.
Buying reviews is illegal so they probably didn't.
No, it isn't, and since a terrible game got looked upon favorably but then was swept under the rug and totally forgotten by everyone, they probably did. You act like I'm saying they walked into review-mart and walked out a few million lighter and holding a certificate for "1 million gullible souls to buy this garbage". They buy with advertising, they buy with exclusive content, they buy with gifts, etc. They give, and the reviewer gives back. It's how it works, and it's never as obvious as it is when a game so widely reviled like Resistance isn't treated as such in a review.