Sega to release HULK, THOR and CAPTAIN AMERICA games.

Sega can’t even pull off a decent Sonic game these days, these are so going to be crap.
 
Here's a review of SPIDER MAN VS KINGPIN and you get an idea why Sega is the best choice for these Marvel games.

http://www.i-mockery.com/shorts/spiderman-genesis/default.php



I picked it because it explains in full the game's strengh in relation to what the comic book is.




Well if you liked that game AMERICA'S ARMY then you will probably like the IRON MAN ga me since the developers who make it are actually a Sega studio,now.
Dude, that a pretty weak argument. In the early 90s, Sega was also capable of putting out GOOD Sonic titles. Today is a very different environment for video games and a very different story for Sega.
 
Sega can’t even pull off a decent Sonic game these days, these are so going to be crap.
Id like to give Sega the benefit of the doubt, but Im really not having much hope here
 
Sega can’t even pull off a decent Sonic game these days, these are so going to be crap.

Sonic is what's known as a dead horse. Seriously, you can only make so many games with him. I think its unfair to judge Sega's ability to make new franchises based only on their ability to revive dead characters.

As for the characters, none really strike my fancy except Iron-Man, because I don't think free-roaming would be a good addition to a Cap or Thor game, and at the moment I'm sucked into free-roaming games. Plus, there's an oppurtunity for puns and hijinx in a Iron-Man game.
 
Dude, that a pretty weak argument. In the early 90s, Sega was also capable of putting out GOOD Sonic titles. Today is a very different environment for video games and a very different story for Sega.

Your argument is also weak for the various reasons.
Sega didn't make the game themselves but got an american games studio to make SPIDER MAN VS KINGPIN and WEB OF FIRE.2)Sega has hired american studios like Secret Level to create some of the new Marvel games that they have the license to. Studios wh are at the top of their game in the modern games market of today.
and finally Sonic isn't the be all and end all of Sega. Any true sega gamers would know that there has been vastly better Sega games since then and now at the arcades and on some game systems. So thinking that they will screw up without even knowing the facts on the Sega Marvel deal and whos making what game is folly at best.
 
Sonic is what's known as a dead horse. Seriously, you can only make so many games with him. I think its unfair to judge Sega's ability to make new franchises based only on their ability to revive dead characters.

As for the characters, none really strike my fancy except Iron-Man, because I don't think free-roaming would be a good addition to a Cap or Thor game, and at the moment I'm sucked into free-roaming games. Plus, there's an oppurtunity for puns and hijinx in a Iron-Man game.
I think a Cap game could have potential if done right. Cap was easily one of the most fun characters to use in MuA and I could see a game featuring him having potential
 
Sonic is what's known as a dead horse. Seriously, you can only make so many games with him. I think its unfair to judge Sega's ability to make new franchises based only on their ability to revive dead characters.

As for the characters, none really strike my fancy except Iron-Man, because I don't think free-roaming would be a good addition to a Cap or Thor game, and at the moment I'm sucked into free-roaming games. Plus, there's an oppurtunity for puns and hijinx in a Iron-Man game.
If nintendo could keep Mario alive for so long then whats SEGAs explanation with Sonic? Both characters and their games operate on the same level. Get through the board while jumping on enemies heads. And don't blame Sonics popularity for this. He has his own ongoing comic thats still published today and was the main contributor to all of the SEGA consoles success.
 
Both Sonic and Mario need to be retired, permanently. I'm gonna reserve my judgment for a final product, but in NO way would i ever judge Segas ability to produce an Iron-Man game based on a stupid blue hedgehog.
 
If nintendo could keep Mario alive for so long then whats SEGAs explanation with Sonic? Both characters and their games operate on the same level. Get through the board while jumping on enemies heads. And don't blame Sonics popularity for this. He has his own ongoing comic thats still published today and was the main contributor to all of the SEGA consoles success.

If you ask me, most of the Mario games haven't been mind-blowing so much as nolstagic and rehashed for younger gamers.

Havoc said:
I think a Cap game could have potential if done right. Cap was easily one of the most fun characters to use in MuA and I could see a game featuring him having potential

I always imagined the game being a 1st person shooter for some reason. lol, maybe it's due to the recent onslaught of WWII games.
 
Both Sonic and Mario need to be retired, permanently. I'm gonna reserve my judgment for a final product, but in NO way would i ever judge Segas ability to produce an Iron-Man game based on a stupid blue hedgehog.


Amen (I would also add zelda, donkey kong and the other kiddie characters to that retired list).

Plus, if they are only publishing the game, they could just hire developers to make the games for them. Condemned and Aliens by sega anyone?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"