• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Shailene Woodley IS Mary Jane Watson! - Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not like there is a 'right' choice for who should play MJ.
But if there's no 'right' choice, how can there be a 'wrong' one? Choosing a talented young actress who's going to star in a huge franchise soon and who'll probably become the next 'it' girl in Hollywood looks like a pretty fine choice to me. I mean, Chris Cooper is too old for Norman Osborn (and clearly not sleek enough), and yet I've never seen anyone complain about him not looking the part. Why? Beacuse he's a great actor who'll bring what's necessary to the part. The same with Shai.
 
But if there's no 'right' choice, how can there be a 'wrong' one?

Because people like to make objective arguments until they get logically dismantled, at which point they say "Oh its all subjective anyways, this is just my opinion" and become like radical postmodern relativist philosophers.

Opinions don't come from thin air. People tend to have reasons for their preferences. And those reasons can be shattered by argumentation, thus causing people to change their opinions (which happens all the time). Some people, however, can't let go of said opinion, and seem to think that the simple fact that it is an opinion is sufficient enough to make it a good opinion.
 
Smoking hot teen supermodel coming your way...lol :eek:

4dd2366f5900514d48f02dc76c0f63a5.jpg
 
Yeah she's a cutie. Not a drop dead gorgeous sexy bombshell, but a cute pretty somewhat innocent but bad side to her type of chick.

IMO I think they will forgo the sexy model type MJ and Shailene will be a bad girl super curious very opinionated MJ. From everything I have seen her in she does this very well.

She will probably have the troubled family life like in Raimi's flicks and will have a mouth to back up her tough exterior. This will probably be what draws Peter to her.

Can someone explain to me how warner brothers managed to pass superman as a average size , skinny shrimp in their tv shows/movies all these years, with no real backlash?

It's funny because superman's body type means more to his characters appearance and lore than mary jane watson's.
 
Saying Woodley isn't my choice for Mary Jane based solely on looks isn't really an argument. It's just a preference.
It's not like there is a 'right' choice for who should play MJ. I don't like the choice, and I don't feel like they're creating my ideal Spider-man movie which upsets me. I think Jessica Alba is incredibly attractive, but she didn't look like Sue storm. The fake looking blue contacts didn't improve it either. It's not because I subcribe to a societally enforced standard of beauty, if anything I think the casting of Woodley may be perpetuating one.



Are you saying she's not a cute little girl? Or that she is infact a smoking hot woman?

No, it's the fact that she's suppose to be a TEENAGER not a WOMAN.
How creepy would it be to have someone whom is possibly underaged in the movie be viewed as a sex object by tons of older guys, and MUCH older guys?
You're just so incredibly ignorant.
You are in fact making MJ out to be an object, a thing of looks, everything else is secondary. If that's true then hell, I'm glad Webb made this decision, he might make MJ, you know, actually interesting. This MJ isn't even on the path to becoming an actress/model because she's still living with her father and attending a public high school. Why can't people get that through there heads, it even contradicts the supposed "cliche" of a wannabe actress being a waitress, which the thing is MJ isn't a wanna be actress, at least not yet. She's a teenager who hasn't been handed full control of her life yet.
 
I wish people would stop comparing Shailene to the Romita comic books because it's so obvious she isn't playing that from set images. And I wish people would stop saying she isn't good enough to be the Romita version because even if she isn't playing that it's so obvious most people round here think she is.... Pointless debate.
 
Last edited:
Can someone explain to me how warner brothers managed to pass superman as a average size , skinny shrimp in their tv shows/movies all these years, with no real backlash?

It's funny because superman's body type means more to his characters appearance and lore than mary jane watson's.

huh??? You lost me:huh:
 
But if there's no 'right' choice, how can there be a 'wrong' one? .


*facepalm* How are you people not getting this... I personally don't like the choice. There is no right or wrong choice for everyone, but I don't agree with the choice made. You get that too Phantasm?

Because people like to make objective arguments until they get logically dismantled, at which point they say "Oh its all subjective anyways, this is just my opinion" and become like radical postmodern relativist philosophers.
.

Are you kidding? I never made an 'objective argument' about anything. If you want to wax intellectual you should learn to discern the difference between an argument, and an opinion.
I don't think that god himself ****ing disagrees with this decision and that the inherant laws of nature nessesitate a different actress whether all humans agree or not. I just dont like the choice, sorry that disturbs some of you so much.

No wonder the quality of movies is declining, you all line up and applaud like circus seals over every mediocre decision made, and then actually swarm the people who dare to question the descision. What makes the studio so perfect? They're just people like us and I'm confident many of the people here could produce smarter superhero stories than some of the garbage that's been put out.
 
I'm saying that it's stupid to be expecting a high school student who probably isn't even 18 yet, story wise, to be a "smoking hot woman". .

That's actually a valid point. I didn't think they'd still be in highschool by this time, and I assumed they'd all be a minimum of 18. She might be a great descision in the context of the film. It's just that I had expectations for this film (and the previous) being a fan of the source material.

High school, aka a place that only has cute girls and not smoking hot women..

Here you're just wrong.
 
Wow. Just... wow. So your irrational subjective dislike of her casting is more valid than actual legit reasons to believe the casting is good? Is this your point?
And they're still in high school in TASM2.
 
No, it's the fact that she's suppose to be a TEENAGER not a WOMAN.
How creepy would it be to have someone whom is possibly underaged in the movie be viewed as a sex object by tons of older guys, and MUCH older guys?

Do you think she's not going to be viewed as a sex symbol? That's just naive. Half the people on here are drooling over her legs and ****.
 
Wow. Just... wow. So your irrational subjective dislike of her casting is more valid than actual legit reasons to believe the casting is good? Is this your point?
And they're still in high school in TASM2.

What are you talking about man? Do you even know what irrational means? My opinion isn't more or less valid than anything... I never said anything along those lines.
My one and only point is that had I made the descision myself, I would not have chose Woodley, due to my own perception of the character she is playing. I never said that this is cause for you all to disagree with the descision... Am I crazy or this very basic stuff guys?

No art is above criticism.
 
You're telling us that you want a smoking hot woman to play a 15 year old girl whose character wasn't even attractive in canon at 15. Nice to see your love for the source material, you're not biased or anything. Very rational, I see.

tumblr_m9fgxsmvR71r0809vo6_250.gif
 
I don't think you grasp what rational means. Aesthetic choices don't require rational justification. Did Parker ever meet the 15 yer old MJ? I didn't think that he did. She'd be good for a flash back or something, but considering that she will now most likely be the permanent MJ actress throughout all of Webbs movies, I'm disappointed.

If you're thrilled with the descision that's great. I envy you.

Honestly I might end up loving Woodley in the movie, my frustration stems from a desire to preserve the Spider-man world as I saw it when I was a child.
 
Last edited:
I don't even know how to spell it to you that whatever dream version of MJ you have, no real person would ever look like her? That if the movie is set in high school, no supermodel ever could be a student there? That Webb and co picked a young actress whose acting abilities were nothing but praised since she got to the big screen? Technically Shai is everything MJ should be both appearance-wise and acting-wise. It seems to me that her only vice is not being afraid of going out without makeup, beacuse god forbid some nerds on the internet think she's not hot enough. Which only makes me like her more, tbh. There are no real reasons to think Shai will be a bad MJ except for potentially bad screenplay or directing. And both these things are out of her control.
tl;dr: I'm kind of sick of ppl hating her for not being all that for their personal tastes. There is plenty of fanart of MJ to f*p to, not all versions are supposed to be like this.
 
That's a load of crap. How can you possibly know what 'dream version' of Mj I have? In reality I have personally seen women whom I felt were real life equivalents of MJ. ACTUAL redheads by the way, which seem to have a harder time getting in movies.

I already explained that I never envisioned a high school Mary Jane appearing in a movie, as Parker never met the high school Mj. And the fact you think there are no models in high schools is just wierd.

"Technically Shai is everything MJ should be both appearance-wise and acting-wise."

That's your opinion dude! It's no more or less rational than mine.
You need to grow up and realise that not everyone is going to agree with you.
 
Last edited:
Have these readheads been nominated for any huge awards? Look at the TASM2 cast, you won't find any nobodies there. Shai's status is not an opinion.

Parker never met a high school Gwen either. And she never knew he was Spider-Man. Do you have problems with that? Or with Cooper's age? Or with absence of Betty Brant, Peter's actual first love? Disliking the general setting of the movies is one thing, but your whole point started as "Shailene looks like a horrible Mary Jane". If you don't feel she is attractive, that's a problem of your view and nothing else, because a) she is, b) her casting wasn't decided by her appearance only.
 
Ok, now you're being childish and dishonest. You claimed no real person will ever look like my ideal MJ, and when I explain that I've seen them, rather than withdraw your statment you quickly shift the goal posts by asking if any have been nominated for awards. Pathetic tactic.

Actually I do have problems with Gwen in highschool and with many of those things you mentioned, but that has no connection to our discussion about woodley. Just a pointless distraction.
I never claimed Shai's status was a matter of opinion, that's a strawman.
I never said Shailene is unattractive, I said the opposite. Another strawman

Forgive me for not blindy accepting everyone of the studios decisions as the best possible.
 
So how old is MJ supposed to be in TASM2? Is she supposed to be younger or the same age as Peter, Gwen & Flash.

I think SHailene fits the role of a 15 yr old or teen ager. However, they still could have cast an actress a little sexier or mature looking.

Truth be told I don't really care. TASM1 wasn't all that good and did little if anything for the Spiderman cinematic universe IMO. Yeah sure there were times where he moved more like a spider/bug I guess, but for the most part I found this spiderman to be a precocious arrogant jerk, and the story was meh IMO. Definitely should have waited for rental.

Hey that's just my opinion no need to get upset or argue.

Also, I thin you can very well have an actress be sexy or model pretty and pay a teen and it not be creepy. I just think Webb isn't going for that type of MJ and that's why he cast Shailene. He's probably going for a MJ that is closer to Shailene's character in Descendents with a more adventurous spirit.
 
Ok, now you're being childish and dishonest. You claimed no real person will ever look like my ideal MJ, and when I explain that I've seen them, rather than withdraw your statment you quickly shift the goal posts by asking if any have been nominated for awards. Pathetic tactic.

Actually I do have problems with Gwen in highschool and with many of those things you mentioned, but that has no connection to our discussion about woodley. Just a pointless distraction.
I never claimed Shai's status was a matter of opinion, that's a strawman.
I never said Shailene is unattractive, I said the opposite. Another strawman

Forgive me for not blindy accepting everyone of the studios decisions as the best possible.
And complaining how your expectations of a super sexy high school girl were not met is not pathetic at all, right? Please. It's a good thing that actual people do look like you imagine MJ, but if they were hired, there would be some other fellow complaining how they don't meet his expectations and how horrible they are at acting.
You did say that Shailene looks like a terrible MJ, when you haven't even seen her as MJ. Forgive me for being tired of this.
 
Correction, I never had expectations of a super sexy 'high school' girl. Im willing to admit that complaining about this movie on the iternet could be seen as pathetic... but so could most of the discussions taking place here. Are you discouraoging people from sharing their thughts on this movie here on a movie forum? If so, you should take your own advice.
 
Yeah, you said "I wanted Mj to be a smoking hot woman" and then it turned nasty, because it violently clashed with the reality of TASM2 being set in high school.
I'm humbly encouraging ppl to do some research before they post. Because Webb's spideyverse is not the perfect one for me either, and in my perfect one I would like to see a more mature version of MJ too, because I'm a sucker for her early 616... well, everything. BUT this is the version they're going with and it's fine too. I like it well enough, and within it the choice of Shai is completely understandable to me. I've grown to really like her and the hate is growing old.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"