The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Should Norman Osborn become a Goblin?

[Majik1387]

When you guys have them, it doesn't suck. When your bias reeks throughout your entire posts, yes.

 

[Kahran Ramsus]

That's conveniently showing up. Harry is just dropped into the movie, and his first scene is him being told by his father we've never seen before that he's dying and Harry has got the disease, too, like we're supposed to give a crap.

Where is the creativity here?

We're given no reason why we should care Harry is dying. There's no built up relationship between Harry and Peter. He and Peter share one brief scene where they act like friends, and there's zero chemistry between them, and just stupid cheesy dialogue "Do you still not do your own hair?" "My butler holds the mirror and I hold the comb"

Like everything else in this movie, it's rushed and sloppily written.

Even assuming everything else worked, they really made a mistake not putting Harry in the first ASM for this very reason.

It would be like the first Captain America film not having Bucky in it, and then still doing Winter Soldier for the sequel.

 

[webhead731]

When you guys have them, it doesn't suck. When your bias reeks throughout your entire posts, yes.

Bias? How? To Raimi? I didn't compare them. I compare to the comic books. You are just making yourself look worse here. There is no bias, just you getting ripped apart.

 

[Morg]

OK Majik, enough.

 

[Majik1387]

I stopped responding if it wasn't clear, because I'm done with the subject.
I stayed on topic in the thread before the naysayers came to complain about ASM2 yet again.

I'm sick of them coming to threads to complain because no one is reading their complaints in the many threads they created this past week simply to bemoan ASM2.

I'm sick of the naysayers saying the franchise is finished, Sony has failed, no one like the new Spider-Man series, etc. and then when explaining why they're wrong they try to spin it so that the people who liked the movies are wrong.

Even when I agree somewhat with some complaints they've had but also state truths, it is ignored or argued upon. There's no winning with them.

So before telling me enough, you should be telling them the same.

 

[webhead731]

Except we did stay on topic.

And welcome to a forum. Where people can discuss their views both positive and negative. This isn't a "We Love ASM2" forum.

And we weren't the ones namecalling and accusing the other of being biased for no reason. Our arguments were perfectly in line with the subject and the rules, and appropriate. Your responses were the issue.

Oh and real quick, how many threads have Joker and I created bashing this movie? Or even about this movie? Because I don't think I have at all.

 

[Spider-Fan]

I stopped responding if it wasn't clear, because I'm done with the subject.
I stayed on topic in the thread before the naysayers came to complain about ASM2 yet again.

I'm sick of them coming to threads to complain because no one is reading their complaints in the many threads they created this past week simply to bemoan ASM2.

I'm sick of the naysayers saying the franchise is finished, Sony has failed, no one like the new Spider-Man series, etc. and then when explaining why they're wrong they try to spin it so that the people who liked the movies are wrong.

Even when I agree somewhat with some complaints they've had but also state truths, it is ignored or argued upon. There's no winning with them.

So before telling me enough, you should be telling them the same.

Except that they have been FAR more respectful in their posting than you have. You basically outright insulted them all, as opposed to arguing points. You started the mudslinging. So, instead of trying to have the last word in and further insulting more people on the way out of the discussion, why don't you do what you SAID you were doing: ending the discussion. Like Morg said. In the 1ST warning. This is the LAST warning.