as one of the biggest matrix fans i am laughing right now. it is just so interesting that you opened a thread about slow motion and you just mentioned spider-man.thedarks0ldier said:In Batman Begins we saw no slow motion, which helped separate it even more from films like Spider-Man or other action flicks. There is some beautiful cinematography in 'Begins that as somebody pointed out in the 'Begins thread, only had the chance to be fully appreciated as a picture of still.
Do you think The Dark Knight should employ some slow motion during some fights, probably during a beating like some boxing movies or in Fight Club (which I think had the best use of slow motion in a movie.)
I personally think the hallucination scenes could have been way more effective had they emphasized the bats or maggots coming out of cranes head. Or like during the Carmine/ Scarcrow scene, something could have been done there to enhance the effect of the hallucination scenes.
As long as they dont do the pointless Peter Jackson slow mo we saw in King Kong or Lord of the Rings I am for the slow motion.
Wesyeed said:I can't remember really, but was the explosion thing with the train at the end of begins slow motion?
StorminNorman said:Actually thats an area I think Slow Mo could be used very effectively. The audience would be able to appreciate his surgical percision if they actually see it.
While I agree it'd be good, it feels a little cliche. I've always been more a fan of Batman coming across Joker in very unexceptional circumstances - it'd make the reaction more potent - like 'holy f-ck! That's *him*'Ronny Shade said:Yes the fall was slow-mo.
Things like that. The entrance of the Joker would rule in slow mo.
Ronny Shade said:I think the Joker entrance needs a fanfare. If any villain is going to enter with fanfare, it's him. I mean, he's the f***ing Joker! Fanfare is his MO. But I could see Batman chasing a shadowing trenchcoated figure down an alley who is taunting him and we realize it's the Joker and like "holy f-ck! That's *him*"
Anita18 said:That's interesting, since the Wayne death scene affected me more in BB than in B89 (where a lot of slow-mo was used). It captured the feeling of what it would be like witnessing such an act - one moment they're alive, and suddenly they're not. The reality of it hit me like a train.
Anguissette1979 said:I agree with the folks who said that it could be used during hallucinations or dream sequences but that's almost a little bit cliche. I abo****ely LOVED BB so I hope that TDK continues the standards that Nolan has established.
where i the slow motion in that clip?Wesyeed said:Yes, I just knew there was slow mo in begins somewhere...I think some of those totally against slow motion must be kids who are tired of the matrix stuff.
Here is how slowmotion is used effectively in a scene. It adds the needed gravity to make this more dramatic, poignant or as we notice later, suspenseful. That's all it's supposed to do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBGhV2gjQMQ&NR
If nolan can do that, I'd be happy as a clown.
Co-sign.lujho said:Anyway... that whole sequence from Unbreakable (not just the bit in the youtube clip, but the whole scene) has some great Batman like iconography which is sorely lacking from Begins. That's the thing - Batman can be a quick, fleeting shadow, but he can also be a slow, stalking monster. Or just a detective looking to clues.
And they way that "fight" never cut away... it just had so much more impact that if it was edited to hell. Not that that's the type of fight Batman would be in (unless maybe against a massively more powerful character like Bane, Croc or Grundy).
Also note that Shyamalan doesn't shy away from full body shots. You see the whole picture.