Gregatron said:...what?
Oh. I see. A bunch of idiots who have nothing better to do than to pick apart the discussions of others.
Bring 'em on.
You're doing something wrong in this world if you don't have enemies and critics.
Gregatron said:...what?
Herr Logan said:How messed up is it when you find yourself wishing for the "old days" when comics were what they should be, when you weren't even alive at the time?
I'm 24 and I find myself reminiscing about the Silver Age. Thank God for the Essential volumes. Second-hand nostalgia as discount prices.
![]()
onceasaint said:Every era of comics has its differences. This most recent era has been full of grim and grit. Shock value stories are what sold consistently. People like Cable were shoved down our throats (look at Alex Ross's design for Magog in Kingdom Come, making fun of characters like Cable). People seem tired of this. People also are quick to make fun of the campy stories written back in the day. There's got to be some balance, and a strong sense of care for characters. That's nearly impossible today, because there's always someone else writing the character after a time. There would have to be a lot of solid and dedicated writers, who arent afraid to look to the fans for suggestions. They also have to be able to look to the material to make sure what fans demand isnt straying from it too much.
I really do hope a lot of these comics find what they've been lacking lately.
Herr Logan said:Spider-Man comics in the early days definitely usually had a more or less predictable formula to them (especially when new villains were introduced).
It's not that a formula is bad in and of itself, but it's that the current formula is a bad one. I like the formula from the early days. It worked well and didn't come off like an obvious attempt to cheat the fans.
Also, the fact that Stan Lee filled every page with lots of words that were not merely repetitive filler (it was often something said previously in another issue, but it wasn't that over-and-over, stuttering, mindless bull$hit that Bendis can't live without) makes a real difference. That's another thing Joey Q should come out and say Stan "spoiled" the fans with. God forbid you have a real writer doing several books at once instead of a an overgrown teenager who rarely ever writes in a character's "voice" instead of his own.
![]()
Gregatron said:You've touched on something important here.
The classic Marvel character all had their own "voices". Spider-Man's, in particular, was very well-defined.
Today's creators mainly write stories as though it's "Me, but with superpowers". They give no thought as to how such well-established characters would behave in a given situation, or what they would say.
Well that explains a lot right there. Heh heh heh.Herr Logan said:I'm 24
Gregatron said:Spider-Man was the first to really make extensive use of (and popularize) thought balloons in comics.
Now, all we have are pseudo-Frank Miller-esque first-person narrative caption boxes:
"I hit him hard. He hits me harder. I stab him with my stingers. He spits at me, then falls and dies. Sometimes a superhero's life is full of hard decisions. But it's easier when you have a hot wife at home to ****."
Gregatron said:The stories of yesteryear were not campy. In other words, the writers did not wink to the audience and say, "Look how dumb this is!" the way they do today.
Cullen said:Well that explains a lot right there. Heh heh heh.
For the record, despite claiming I had a pet dinosaur as a child, I'm early thirties. I only feel old
and gray
and useless.
I lived during the glory days of the eighties, where comics were really overwritten and damn proud of it. Good stuff. Fun stuff. Classic stuff.
Damn it! You're right.Herr Logan said:You already knew how old I was, old man. Now eat your extra-mashed apple sauce. There ya go... don't make a mess, now!
![]()
Um, Sue and Reed's marriage is untainted. Isn't it?ShadowBoxing said:God damnit...they broke up Scott and Jean and now this...leave one marriage untainted...MU is starting to look like Hollywood.
We have one...I guess until they kill one of them (supposedly) right...or did that turn out to be a hoax.Cullen said:Um, Sue and Reed's marriage is untainted. Isn't it?
Cullen said:Um, Sue and Reed's marriage is untainted. Isn't it?
Cullen said:All my illusions have now been shattered.
Thanks!![]()
All of my illusions about Spider-man died at "Sins Past". Marvel, however, still had one or two phantoms to be dispelled by the light...shinlyle said:Sorry, man. My illusions were shattered after I watched Spider-Man eat a guy's head.![]()
shinlyle said:Well....they're supposed to be split apart during the Civil War, from what I've heard. Nothing permanent, but seeing as how Reed sides with the Pro-registration side, and Sue is anti-registration, there are bound to be some irreconcilable differences there.
Hey, Marvel, why do you HATE marriage so much?
I must be a mutant since I love my wife and am happily married.
At least, I was a mutant until that "House of M" thing...![]()
LarryLegend said:Maybe they don't have successful marriages.![]()
shinlyle said:I guess not! I always wanted to draw comics for Marvel, but now, I think I'd better go to DC. Marriage seems to be appreciated over there.
LarryLegend said:Say it ain't so Shinlyle.![]()
WOLVERINE25TH said:Someone's been watchin' Knight Rider again.