The Amazing Spider-Man So now we've seen both, which was the best?

Which was the best?

  • Raimi's Spider-man

  • Webb's Amazing Spider-man

  • I don't want to compare them

  • They are equal

  • Raimi's Spider-man

  • Webb's Amazing Spider-man

  • I don't want to compare them

  • They are equal


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I disagree.
The Science in TASM was PRETTY real, The Ganali decice was told so it could be taken seriously.
I mean... Cmon.... Did you see how Hi-Tech Oscorp was compared to the test of NY?
I could belive that it could exist.
 
I fully disagree with that. I thought the costume looked terrible from head till toe and the mask itself was probably the worst thing about the whole costume. But hey, to each his own.

The mask could not be the worst thing of the costume when the mask itself was the only thing that represented the look of a goblin. Without the mask, him being dubbed 'The Green Goblin' would make absolutely no sense. Without a creative-looking mask, he could be called the Green Power Ranger as he's dubbed on these forums.

What exactly is the Green Goblin's reason and motivation for everything he does after he kills those guys that fired him? He keeps going on and on about how he will use his powers for "evil things" and keeps asking Spider-Man to join him but we never get a reason for why. What exactly would he want Spider-Man to join him for? Join him in killing random innocent civilians? Join him in taking over the world and establishing a dictatorship under their rule? Join him to blow up the Brooklyn Bridge? Join him in a team up to win all gold metals in the Olympics since they both have superhuman abilities? He has no reason whatsoever for anything he does after he kills those guys. His motivation in a nutshell can be "I am evil and I do evil things! Why am I evil? Because I took that serum! Join me, Spider-Man! Muahahaha!"

His agenda moved on after killing the board members because of who he faced, Spider-Man. Seeing someone else with incredible abilities gave Gobby the idea that Spidey would become a great ally. And when Spider-Man declined the offer, well, you know what else happened with Osborn targeting Peter's "heart". It could've done a bit more work for some to understand it I suppose since you didn't, lol, but I rather enjoyed a take where a villain tried to ask a hero to team with him.

The Lizard, on the other hand, does have a reason and motivation for what he is doing. He believes that he has achieved perfection after many years of searching for it and is desperate to share this gift with the world and make everyone else perfect like him. He believes he has found the cure to all of people's physical problems and that's why he does what he does. That is what drives him up until the final point to release that container across the city. What exactly drives the Green Goblin? Why is he a villain to begin with after those guys that fired him were killed? The movie never addresses that. At least TASM addresses the fact why the Lizard is a villain in the movie (because from his point of view, he believes he's doing the right thing). Are the motivations and reasons of the Lizard in TASM fully developed? No. Could they have devoted more screen time to developing those? Yes. But at least he has a plan based on a reason and a motivation, unlike GG, and they were also partly influenced by the goal Connors had his whole life.

The reason/motivation is fine, but the master plan itself was hilarious and all kinds of corny.

We've had the talk about the duration of the serum before. Connors did say in his notes that increasing the dose would make the duration last a lot longer, and it did create a big cloud over Manhattan. I'm assuming the cloud/mutation/whatever you wanna call it would've been there if not forever, then for a pretty long time. Even if he does have to refill the canister every now and there (which I don't think he does), I don't think he would have to do that for at least an amount of time long enough that it wouldn't become a weekly/monthly procedure. Not a bad thing IMO. I've seen villains in many different mediums that had to do stuff similar to that and it worked out fine.

We could all assume that something could be forever, lol. Plus, bringing up the different mediums...those are NOT films. A comic or cartoon is fine because you don't really need to bring in logic, but when a film wants to be a bit more realistic in this day and age, a master plan should actually make sense.

Pretty much almost all Spider-Man villains are not kid-friendly to begin with when you see them at their full potential and go deep into their characters. Could the Lizard in TASM have been done better? Absolutely. Could he have been more frightening? Absolutely. Is it a bad take or portrayal on the Lizard? No. It's not a bad take on him at all. It's a pretty good take; just not as great as the best takes you could do with the Lizard in live-action in general (kinda like Scarecrow in Batman Begins; a good take but not the best/scariest thing you can do with Scarecrow in live-action). I personally don't think the Lizard was the best choice for the first movie to begin with. The Lizard is something you want to bring in the sequels after you established a relationship with Peter and Dr. Connors. I still would've preferred Electro or Mysterio (they were my top 2 choices) because I think they would've fit as better villains for the first movie and also because I like them more than the Lizard. I also think having a villain not meant to be sympathetic would've made TASM more original & epic from the Raimi films (all the villains in the Raimi films were sympathetic villains). And personally, I am sick of Spider-Man movies with sympathetic villains in them. I hope TASM 2 will finally have a villain that isn't so.

Agreed; TAS-M could've done a hell a lot better to actually make Lizard not kid friendly. He didn't even try to kill and doesn't look remotely scary.

I also find it funny how you have no problem with the heavily watered down Green Goblin in SM1 yet you complain about Lizard in TASM. Lizard is nowhere as watered down in this movie as Green Goblin was. The Green Goblin should be as dark, scary, and threatening as the Joker. This is the same guy that gave Peter tons of mental crap (beyond just killing Gwen), scarred him many times, and overthrew Tony Stark and became a villain to the whole Marvel universe at one point. Comic GG would mop the floor with Raimi's GG. Not only did SM1 give him a cheesy look but also gave him ridiculously cheesy lines like ""TOGETHER WE CAN TAKE OVER! WE WILL MEET AGAIN SPIDER MAN!!" and stripped him of many great aspects. The closest he got to being frightening was attacking Aunt May, which B ranked villains have done in Spidey comics before. The Lizard in TASM at least had some serious and frightening scenes, like the scenes in the sewers (especially when he attacks Peter) and had more serious and more mature lines of dialogue. He was also a bigger threat to New York than GG in SM1 was and seeing as how TASM's Spidey seems to be faster and more agile than SM1's Spidey and still got pretty a**-whooped by the Lizard, I would argue this Lizard would be a tougher challenge physically for SM1's Spidey than GG was.

I never said Green Goblin couldn't have been better, but I still viewed GG loads better than Lizard. GG actually felt like a menacing villain in Raimi's origin film, Lizard did not at anywhere throughout the duration of TAS-M.

I recently rewatched The Spectacular Spider-Man. What I noticed about the show's GG is that he seemed a lot more darker, scarier, creepier, threatening, stronger, and more intelligent than Raimi's GG plus he had more mature lines throughout the series. Doesn't that sound embarrassing if you think about it? That a Saturday morning cartoon show managed to make a version of GG that is darker, scarier, and more threatening than a theatrical live-action version of GG? There is a serious problem right there. Just want to point that out.

The same could be said for Lizard, but what's your point? TSSM did wonders with many of Spidey's villains and better than any of the live action villains other than Doc Ock.

Yeap... I prefer the reboot version, but I don't totally bash the old ones. They did have good parts, and some things SM1 even has better than TASM. I mean, when Uncle Ben died in SM1, I remember it being really gut wrenching and I actually cried along side with Tobey :woot: also, pacing is a little better in the old one, and tone is really consistent in SM1, when in TASM the tone changes from like a character driven flick to a basic superhero movie

The only movie I bash a whole lot is Spider-Man 3, but that is definitely understandable, lol.

I disagree.
The Science in TASM was PRETTY real, The Ganali decice was told so it could be taken seriously.
I mean... Cmon.... Did you see how Hi-Tech Oscorp was compared to the test of NY?
I could belive that it could exist.

They tried very hard to make the science seem real, I'll give it that, but that's about it. The science can be fine, but the plan itself into turning the citizens into lizards as well is something I didn't care for and I wish they had something else, or at least make it a smaller, more personal situation where Connors tried to turn his own family into lizards just like the 90s series. THAT I wouldn't mind because it was only two more people turning into lizards which wouldn't seem like a B-rated sci-fi idea and would also make the plan itself so much more personal.

But would I believe such a thing could exist? No. How could someone believe something like that could exist?
 
Jeez, only in a comic book forum do geeks talk about about fictional stories being real. Idiots abound. :dry:
 
©KAW;24562229 said:
Jeez, only in a comic book forum do geeks talk about about fictional stories being real. Idiots abound. :dry:

Well you can count me out, I'm done with this. Spider-Man is my childhood superhero but Star Wars is my bread and butter so as you could imagine I feel like a kid at christmas! Farewell Webbheads and Raimians!
 
©KAW;24562229 said:
Jeez, only in a comic book forum do geeks talk about about fictional stories being real. Idiots abound. :dry:

Coming from you, I doubt anyone will take your words to heart :cwink:
 
I'm the other way around with Goblin. I like the armor, but I'd change the mask, since I've seen some pretty sinister masks that they were going to use, but decided to go with that one.
 
The suit was crap, imo. The helmet was creative, but that's all I can say even about the helmet as the whole robotic look was just wrong. It's not as bad as Hulk Goblin, but it's pretty damn bad.

Can you suggest anything better?

As I said,the latex suit would look ridiculous,the suit he wore made sense as it was a suit for the one piloting the glider and he stole it
What would people think of a Latex suit? 'Oh he just made it because he likes to be theatrical'
 
Can you suggest anything better?

As I said,the latex suit would look ridiculous,the suit he wore made sense as it was a suit for the one piloting the glider and he stole it
What would people think of a Latex suit? 'Oh he just made it because he likes to be theatrical'

I agree that it wouldn't make much sense in SM1 but I'd totally buy that now.
 
Can you suggest anything better?

As I said,the latex suit would look ridiculous,the suit he wore made sense as it was a suit for the one piloting the glider and he stole it
What would people think of a Latex suit? 'Oh he just made it because he likes to be theatrical'

Norman_Osborn_(Earth-6109).jpg


This look has, imo, always been something that I'd accept, either in the '02 film or the reboot's new look for GG whenever he shows up. It could be a much different material than latex as well.
 
Norman_Osborn_(Earth-6109).jpg


This look has, imo, always been something that I'd accept, either in the '02 film or the reboot's new look for GG whenever he shows up. It could be a much different material than latex as well.

You are missing a point,how would they explain a old man turning up in a fancy suit?
The suit they showed had an explanation,it was the pilot's suit and Norman stole it along with the glider
 
It would make sense in the context that he's a lunatic. Just display how bat**** crazy he is, and mention a love of folklore and goblins he has or something like that, and no one would blink an eye.
There's a way to do it without making him look like a power ranger.
Overlooking the actual science behind turning people into lizards, I don't see what's so unrealistic about the plan.
Hitler wanted to replace humanity with a race of super men. Stalin wanted to create a race of gorilla-human hybrids. Connor's plan to recreate the world in his own reptilian image, which is arguably superior, is entirely believable for me.
Completely agreed.
The guy is insane and his brain is muddled by the lizard formula. I can completely buy into him wanting to change the entire city into lizard beings like himself, it makes sense.

I just hated the execution of the Lizard. He's too big, fake looking and not at all scary. Those gigantic hands busting through the car windows look stupid. We never should have seen a well lit, naked full body shot. Instead they should have concealed him most of the time with shadows and the lab coat.
Here's where we disagree haha. I thought the lizard looked spectacular. Granted I kind of wish he had the snout like he did in the comics, as I love the more dinosaur-like look, but I thought he looked perfectly fine in the film. Heck in certain shots I remember being blown away by how good they made him look, especially the color and texture of his skin.
Size wise I also think he was perfect. Big enough to give spider-man a run for his money but not to big to the point where he looks ridiculous.
Raimi's SM1If Peter's good looking, smart and funny, how is he so unpopular?
To be fair, later in the Ditko/Lee run and then pretty much all the way through the Romita/Lee run he was portrayed as particularly handsome, charming, and mysterious to women. He had several girls interested in him at any given time. He was still a misunderstood loner, but being spider-man changed him and gave him a confidence he never knew before. It also physically changed him and made him more muscular and more attractive.
 
Last edited:
You are missing a point,how would they explain a old man turning up in a fancy suit?
The suit they showed had an explanation,it was the pilot's suit and Norman stole it along with the glider

It would make sense in the context that he's a lunatic. Just display how bat**** crazy he is, and mention a love of folklore and goblins he has or something like that, and no one would blink an eye.
There's a way to do it without making him look like a power ranger.

Juicy J got it. Look at TSSM with Norman's shelf of different masks and what not. Explain Norman's obsession with folklore/occults/stuff like that.

The explanation of the pilot suit and what not really made no sense when we randomly see Norman create a goblin mask as well with zero explanation for that.
 
Love for Folklore? That would seem ridiculous

They werent going in that direction with the Oz serum.It amplifies the strenghts and aggresiveness and precipitates Lunatic behavior.Thats all

Except the hiccup with his plan(joining forces with Spidey) and the explanation about the mask everything else was perfect in the movie imo.
 
The explanation of the pilot suit and what not really made no sense when we randomly see Norman create a goblin mask as well with zero explanation for that.

Exactly.
Other than a handful of tribal masks in his penthouse (a tenuous link at best) there was no reason for him to make a green creepy mask and take on the whole goblin persona.
Him having an affixation with the occult/folklore in general, goblins in particular, combined with an already unstable, narcissistic, and devious personality all before the goblin serum could easily translate to him putting on a creepy weird goblin costume that he made himself once he's exposed to the formula.
 
Love for Folklore? That would seem ridiculous

They werent going in that direction with the Oz serum.It amplifies the strenghts and aggresiveness and precipitates Lunatic behavior.Thats all

Except the hiccup with his plan(joining forces with Spidey) and the explanation about the mask everything else was perfect in the movie imo.

Any more ridiculous than an alien symbiote being used in a trilogy that was mostly revolved around science experiments?

That wouldn't have been ridiculous at all. It would actually make it pretty cool for Norman Osborn to assume a 'Goblin' persona other than JJJ naming him that solely because of his mask and nothing more.

Exactly.
Other than a handful of tribal masks in his penthouse (a tenuous link at best) there was no reason for him to make a green creepy mask and take on the whole goblin persona.
Him having an affixation with the occult/folklore in general, goblins in particular, combined with an already unstable, narcissistic, and devious personality all before the goblin serum could easily translate to him putting on a creepy weird goblin costume that he made himself once he's exposed to the formula.

Agree :up:
 
That picture you posted is spot on to the goblin I've been wanting to see in the movies, btw. Arguably his best look to date, I hope they take cues from that for the way they handle him in this next film series.
 
The mask could not be the worst thing of the costume when the mask itself was the only thing that represented the look of a goblin. Without the mask, him being dubbed 'The Green Goblin' would make absolutely no sense. Without a creative-looking mask, he could be called the Green Power Ranger as he's dubbed on these forums.

The open mouth of the costume looked ridiculous and is the main thing that made GG not scary. If you're going to give him armor (which he wore in the comics a lot as well, though it was purple and looked more theatrical), at least make his mask look scary. It is the part that looked the most goblin-ish but that doesn't say much overall. That's why I said the costume is bad from head till toe.



His agenda moved on after killing the board members because of who he faced, Spider-Man. Seeing someone else with incredible abilities gave Gobby the idea that Spidey would become a great ally. And when Spider-Man declined the offer, well, you know what else happened with Osborn targeting Peter's "heart". It could've done a bit more work for some to understand it I suppose since you didn't, lol, but I rather enjoyed a take where a villain tried to ask a hero to team with him.

The reason/motivation is fine, but the master plan itself was hilarious and all kinds of corny.

Him asking Spidey to team up with him is fine. However, it is never specified the reason why he wants Spidey to team up with him. WHY does he want Spidey as an ally? For WHAT exactly? Does he need Spidey to take over the world? Win the Olympics? Rob a few banks? It doesn't have to be some deep complex plan. You could've had a simple throwaway line like "Hey Spider-Man! Let's team up and let's rob tons of banks!" or "Hey Spider-Man! Let's team up and take over the world and establish a totalitarian rule! Muahahaha!" In order for him to want Peter on his side and to try to do that by targeting his "heart", he would need to have a plan to do something to begin with. You don't get that in the movie. All you get is "Join me, Spider-Man! I am evil and together, we can both be evil! Muahahaha! The dark side has cookies!" The Green Goblin's reasons and motivations are severely lacking.

I still don't see how the Lizard's master plan is unbelievable. The idea of turning everyone into a Lizard might sound hilarious to the average Joe but that doesn't mean the plan isn't believable to Connors. He was driven insane by the Lizard formula and it made him believe that. Any person in Connors' shoes would've found the plan believable. The plan is very believable to Connors and there are very messed up people in real life that believe very similar things, so the plan isn't unrealistic at all. Makes sense a person driven to that point of insanity due to a formula that mutated him would have a plan like that. The Slang made a really good point too:

Hitler wanted to replace humanity with a race of super men. Stalin wanted to create a race of gorilla-human hybrids. Connor's plan to recreate the world in his own reptilian image, which is arguably superior, is entirely believable for me.


We could all assume that something could be forever, lol. Plus, bringing up the different mediums...those are NOT films. A comic or cartoon is fine because you don't really need to bring in logic, but when a film wants to be a bit more realistic in this day and age, a master plan should actually make sense.

Connors' notes and the big cloud created over the city is enough for me to come to a conclusion. I think both of those heavily imply that the mutations would last and like I said, even if it did, it wouldn't be a big problem. And who says I saw just comics and cartoons have villains with plans similar to those? I saw many movies with villains that had very "comic booky" plans too. Also, something being a comic, cartoon, or movie is irrelevant to the logic and realism behind it. Comics, cartoons, and movies are all just different forms of mediums. That is literally it. There are comics and cartoons very grounded in reality and very logical, there are movies that are very unrealistic and not very logical, there are comics and cartoons very unrealistic and not logical, and there are movies that are very logical. This might be a bit off topic but I think people who say you don't need to have logic or intelligent things that make sense in a comic or cartoon are undermining the mediums and are partly responsible for comics and cartoons being viewed as nothing but children's mediums by a lot of people in the western world.

Agreed; TAS-M could've done a hell a lot better to actually make Lizard not kid friendly. He didn't even try to kill and doesn't look remotely scary.

He didn't try to kill? How about all the police officers he attacked and cars he flipped over? He tried to kill Ratha at one point in the movie too. Hell, he killed one major character in the movie. As for him being scary, at least he had a few scary scenes in the movie, like the sewer scene and the scene where he spots Gwen in the closet (everyone in theatres jumped from their seats during that moment lol).

I never said Green Goblin couldn't have been better, but I still viewed GG loads better than Lizard. GG actually felt like a menacing villain in Raimi's origin film, Lizard did not at anywhere throughout the duration of TAS-M.

Well, that's more of an opinion and I can't say much on that. I personally didn't find GG in SM1 scary at all while I thought the Lizard had a few scary scenes in TASM (the ones I brought up earlier). I also felt the Lizard was more of a threat in general than GG. Not only did he get a lot closer to taking over the city and was a much bigger threat to the city than GG was but Spider-Man also couldn't physically defeat him in a fight. Why would that matter, you might wonder? Well, if you compare Spider-Man and GG in SM1, they're pretty much on an equal physical level throughout the movie until the end where Spider-Man overpowers him. Then if you compare TASM's Spider-Man with SM1's Spider-Man, TASM's version of Spider-Man seems faster, more agile, stronger, more flexible, more intelligent, etc. So basically, I feel that the Lizard in this movie was stronger than GG in the first Raimi movie thus he was more of a threat to begin with. Tobey's Spider-Man would've had a harder time beating him than GG but that's just my opinion based on what I've observed.
The same could be said for Lizard, but what's your point? TSSM did wonders with many of Spidey's villains and better than any of the live action villains other than Doc Ock.

True (and I would include Doc Ock in there but that's just my opinion). The same thing can be said for Lizard but I feel that the Lizard in TASM could at least put up a fight with the Lizard in TSSM, maybe even beat him at this point since TASM's Lizard is more intelligent while we never got to see TSSM's Lizard's level of intelligence due to the show being cancelled prematurely. The gap between the GG's is far far bigger. I feel that TSSM's Green Goblin would mop the floor with SM1's Green Goblin.


They tried very hard to make the science seem real, I'll give it that, but that's about it. The science can be fine, but the plan itself into turning the citizens into lizards as well is something I didn't care for and I wish they had something else, or at least make it a smaller, more personal situation where Connors tried to turn his own family into lizards just like the 90s series. THAT I wouldn't mind because it was only two more people turning into lizards which wouldn't seem like a B-rated sci-fi idea and would also make the plan itself so much more personal.

I'm pretty sure the Lizard tried to turn everyone into a Lizard in the 90s series as well. He said his wife would've been the first one and then everyone else.
 
They tried very hard to make the science seem real, I'll give it that, but that's about it. The science can be fine, but the plan itself into turning the citizens into lizards as well is something I didn't care for and I wish they had something else, or at least make it a smaller, more personal situation where Connors tried to turn his own family into lizards just like the 90s series. THAT I wouldn't mind because it was only two more people turning into lizards which wouldn't seem like a B-rated sci-fi idea and would also make the plan itself so much more personal.

I don't know if you remember, but he did want to turn the whole city as well in the 90s series, he just wanted to turn the family first
 
The open mouth of the costume looked ridiculous and is the main thing that made GG not scary. If you're going to give him armor (which he wore in the comics a lot as well, though it was purple and looked more theatrical), at least make his mask look scary. It is the part that looked the most goblin-ish but that doesn't say much overall. That's why I said the costume is bad from head till toe.

The helmet being the most goblin-ish thing makes it the best part of the suit. Needless to say, I have complaints of that as well with the mouth as well as the eyes, especially when they slide up, but I'm not getting into details and only saying how I believe the mask is the best part simply because without that, he's more of a Rocket Racer as well than a Green Goblin. Heck, Norman could've easily been Rocket Racer I while Harry could've been Rocket Racer II.

Him asking Spidey to team up with him is fine. However, it is never specified the reason why he wants Spidey to team up with him. WHY does he want Spidey as an ally? For WHAT exactly? Does he need Spidey to take over the world? Win the Olympics? Rob a few banks? It doesn't have to be some deep complex plan. You could've had a simple throwaway line like "Hey Spider-Man! Let's team up and let's rob tons of banks!" or "Hey Spider-Man! Let's team up and take over the world and establish a totalitarian rule! Muahahaha!" In order for him to want Peter on his side and to try to do that by targeting his "heart", he would need to have a plan to do something to begin with. You don't get that in the movie. All you get is "Join me, Spider-Man! I am evil and together, we can both be evil! Muahahaha! The dark side has cookies!" The Green Goblin's reasons and motivations are severely lacking.

I agree it could've been explained a bit more on what they would have done together as a team, but that's just schematics since Spidey declined the offer.

I still don't see how the Lizard's master plan is unbelievable. The idea of turning everyone into a Lizard might sound hilarious to the average Joe but that doesn't mean the plan isn't believable to Connors. He was driven insane by the Lizard formula and it made him believe that. Any person in Connors' shoes would've found the plan believable. The plan is very believable to Connors and there are very messed up people in real life that believe very similar things, so the plan isn't unrealistic at all. Makes sense a person driven to that point of insanity due to a formula that mutated him would have a plan like that. The Slang made a really good point too:

But we are talking about what the audience thinks, and this guy right here thought it was an extremely hilarious plan and didn't really keep any "grounded" tone Webb was ever trying to build with his reboot with Connors trying to create a lizard colony.

Connors' notes and the big cloud created over the city is enough for me to come to a conclusion. I think both of those heavily imply that the mutations would last and like I said, even if it did, it wouldn't be a big problem. And who says I saw just comics and cartoons have villains with plans similar to those? I saw many movies with villains that had very "comic booky" plans too. Also, something being a comic, cartoon, or movie is irrelevant to the logic and realism behind it. Comics, cartoons, and movies are all just different forms of mediums. That is literally it. There are comics and cartoons very grounded in reality and very logical, there are movies that are very unrealistic and not very logical, there are comics and cartoons very unrealistic and not logical, and there are movies that are very logical. This might be a bit off topic but I think people who say you don't need to have logic or intelligent things that make sense in a comic or cartoon are undermining the mediums and are partly responsible for comics and cartoons being viewed as nothing but children's mediums by a lot of people in the western world.

I myself didn't find the notes and the big cloud giving any conclusion on the lasting effects of the city. It just seemed like only a first phase of what could become a boring regime of Lizard re-filling the canister over and over and over.

He didn't try to kill? How about all the police officers he attacked and cars he flipped over? He tried to kill Ratha at one point in the movie too. Hell, he killed one major character in the movie. As for him being scary, at least he had a few scary scenes in the movie, like the sewer scene and the scene where he spots Gwen in the closet (everyone in theatres jumped from their seats during that moment lol).

Your theatre was full of pansies? That's nice, lol. Any scene off of any Paranormal Activity installment was scarier than that...and those films aren't even scary, lol. And you give some examples, but those examples are filled with attempts of killing besides Captain Stacy. That's only one kill and a cliche kill at that. Nothing to really show Lizard just killing just to do it, and most of the officers Lizard attacked, well, maybe all of them, were turned from that gas.

Well, that's more of an opinion and I can't say much on that. I personally didn't find GG in SM1 scary at all while I thought the Lizard had a few scary scenes in TASM (the ones I brought up earlier). I also felt the Lizard was more of a threat in general than GG. Not only did he get a lot closer to taking over the city and was a much bigger threat to the city than GG was but Spider-Man also couldn't physically defeat him in a fight. Why would that matter, you might wonder? Well, if you compare Spider-Man and GG in SM1, they're pretty much on an equal physical level throughout the movie until the end where Spider-Man overpowers him. Then if you compare TASM's Spider-Man with SM1's Spider-Man, TASM's version of Spider-Man seems faster, more agile, stronger, more flexible, more intelligent, etc. So basically, I feel that the Lizard in this movie was stronger than GG in the first Raimi movie thus he was more of a threat to begin with. Tobey's Spider-Man would've had a harder time beating him than GG but that's just my opinion based on what I've observed.

Well of course Lizard was stronger than GG. I don't have any proof to say GG would be stronger just because it's a giant lizard, lol, but I think we also disagree on who was a more general threat to the city. Yes, Lizard wanted to turn the city into lizards, but Green Goblin went on a havoc spree on that bridge and more so than Lizard during his first confrontation with Spider-Man.

True (and I would include Doc Ock in there but that's just my opinion). The same thing can be said for Lizard but I feel that the Lizard in TASM could at least put up a fight with the Lizard in TSSM, maybe even beat him at this point since TASM's Lizard is more intelligent while we never got to see TSSM's Lizard's level of intelligence due to the show being cancelled prematurely. The gap between the GG's is far far bigger. I feel that TSSM's Green Goblin would mop the floor with SM1's Green Goblin.

While TAS-M's Lizard may have shown some intelligence, TSSM's Lizard was much more feral and actually felt like a beast was taking over Connors and that's why I'd say TSSM's Lizard would have won in a battle between the two.

But now I have to ask, why would you say TSSM did a better job as Ock?

For the next two, I'll reply once for both since they're mentioning the same thing.

I'm pretty sure the Lizard tried to turn everyone into a Lizard in the 90s series as well. He said his wife would've been the first one and then everyone else.

I don't know if you remember, but he did want to turn the whole city as well in the 90s series, he just wanted to turn the family first

I am aware of Lizard wanting to turn the city as well in the 90s series, but I think it would create a more personal story in having Connors trying to turn his family and that be his goal, or at least phase one and never even get to phase two with turning the city. Even trying to turn the city, it didn't seem like the city was afraid, or at least wasn't shown as much as the city's fear with Joker's attack in TDK. The city did not seem to play a role except for the SWAT team being turned and nevertheless, they didn't do anything and we didn't even see them again until they revert back.
 
Last edited:
So Garfield's funnier than Maguire? Eh. Switch the Peters from both movies and tell me which one's a better film.

I would still argue TASM is the better film. The thing is that you have to remember is that it's not JUST about making Spider-man funny for the sake of comic relief. It's actually a MAJOR character point for him

I write more about it here:
http://fenskeland.blogspot.ca/2012/11/spider-movie-part-iv-spider-man-cocky.html

But the point is that if you 'Just switch the Peter's' it wouldn't be the same film that we're comparing. Even the motivation and reasoning for having him act that way are grounded in the characters back story, specific to each individual film.

If Peter's good looking, smart and funny, how is he so unpopular?

The only answer I have to that is this
http://fenskeland.blogspot.ca/2012/10/spider-movie-part-iii-peter-parker-nerd.html

Juicy J had a pretty good point too:

To be fair, later in the Ditko/Lee run and then pretty much all the way through the Romita/Lee run he was portrayed as particularly handsome, charming, and mysterious to women. He had several girls interested in him at any given time. He was still a misunderstood loner, but being spider-man changed him and gave him a confidence he never knew before. It also physically changed him and made him more muscular and more attractive.

Although I don't know that I agree about it making him 'more attractive' facially, it certainly would have made him more muscular and given him a newfound confidence that would have helped
 
Last edited:
Any more ridiculous than an alien symbiote being used in a trilogy that was mostly revolved around science experiments?
Dont bring SM3 into this,that movie was ridiculous at some points

That wouldn't have been ridiculous at all. It would actually make it pretty cool for Norman Osborn to assume a 'Goblin' persona other than JJJ naming him that solely because of his mask and nothing more.
So you nitpick because that wasnt a part of his persona?
Remind me again how your favourite movies have supervillians entirely dedicated to their comic book counterparts?
The Goblin in SM1 was excellent,its easy for us to say 'They should have done this and that' in our armchairs when those concepts wouldnt look good on the big screen and Raimi probably calculated that
Norman was potrayed as a dedicated and smart scientist who invested everything from his whole life to money into his Industry,making him a lunatic pre-serum who obsesses with Folk-lore wouldnt have been in line with his Pre-serum personlity
 
I am aware of Lizard wanting to turn the city as well in the 90s series, but I think it would create a more personal story in having Connors trying to turn his family and that be his goal, or at least phase one and never even get to phase two with turning the city. Even trying to turn the city, it didn't seem like the city was afraid, or at least wasn't shown as much as the city's fear with Joker's attack in TDK. The city did not seem to play a role except for the SWAT team being turned and nevertheless, they didn't do anything and we didn't even see them again until they revert back.

The city wasnt afraid because they didnt know of his plan at all
 
And the Lizard was slow as hell,Why didnt they make him capable of running on all 4?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"