Sequels Sony is thinking May 2011 for Spidey 4

[scatterax]

i think he's just taking this conected movieverse to literally

 

[LightningFlash]

i think he's just taking this conected movieverse to literally

Or, you know...you guys could read stuff on your own from time to time and learn this....Marvel Studios is trying to set-up this massive continuity over Marvel's Universe with the Avengers. And the movies being paired up in TWO, it's meant to be like this.

Iron Man is the first movie on the set-up, and then The Incredible Hulk with Tony Stark trying to get General Ross in the group.

And then in Iron Man II, Thor is set to appear, possibly in the way Nick Fury did in the first one, which is to set up the Thor film that very year(2010).

And then in 2011, you have The First Avenger: Captain America set in WWII to show the origin of Cap, which then moves on to The Avengers in 2011.

And also, there might be movies of Ant-Man in 2012, then following with a solo Nick Fury, Doctor Strange, Black Panther and Cloak and Dagger.

I'm not taking it literally, just excited that finally we get some worth-while MARVEL films with some continuity in them.

 

[FaT_tONle]

I am also in the same boat with delaying Avengers... Marvel's slate is ridiculous... I am convinced they have no clue how they are going to make this thing work. I could see both Cap AND Avengers getting pushed back at least a year. SM4 will take the May 2011 release away from Marvel IMO... and BB3 will settle into the July spot... the way it should have been... I love Marvel and respect what their independent studio has done up until now but they just need to understand their place. Warner Bros/Sony need those release dates as well.

 

[LightningFlash]

I don't see Batman 3 in 2011...I don't see that movie for quite some time, imo.

 

[Spider-ManHero12]

huh...February?
I wouldn't get my hopes up neither. it'll probably be what we already know about. he might say that he's happy to come back, he's happy to have Tobey back, that SM4 and 5 can possibly be filmed together and bla bla bla. nothing big, I think.

True, you just might be right. It'll still check it out, but I know what you mean.

 

[p4poetic]

Is that really such a bad thing? The other three I understand, but being true to the comics would only be an improvement.

Only when its get too nitpicky, I mean. You know, like ZOMGGG NO WEBSHOOTERS!!11ONE

 

[I Am The Knight]

I'm not taking it literally, just excited that finally we get some worth-while MARVEL films with some continuity in them.

Well, for a minute there, it seemed like you were doing just that, as you're the first person that I've ever seen describing TIH as a sequel to Iron Man Don't use that term again.

 

[LightningFlash]

As I'm saying TIH was "its" sequel, meaning as a sequel in the Avengers continuity. Read my post on the last page, I did use "its"...and yes, in quotes as well.

 

[scatterax]

Or, you know...you guys could read stuff on your own from time to time and learn this....Marvel Studios is trying to set-up this massive continuity over Marvel's Universe with the Avengers. And the movies being paired up in TWO, it's meant to be like this.

Iron Man is the first movie on the set-up, and then The Incredible Hulk with Tony Stark trying to get General Ross in the group.

And then in Iron Man II, Thor is set to appear, possibly in the way Nick Fury did in the first one, which is to set up the Thor film that very year(2010).

And then in 2011, you have The First Avenger: Captain America set in WWII to show the origin of Cap, which then moves on to The Avengers in 2011.

And also, there might be movies of Ant-Man in 2012, then following with a solo Nick Fury, Doctor Strange, Black Panther and Cloak and Dagger.

I'm not taking it literally, just excited that finally we get some worth-while MARVEL films with some continuity in them.

ya, but the hulk wasn't a sequil to iron man. those movies are connected, but not the same franchise. kinda like the comic books. the avengers is the only movie (series) you can consider as a secuil to both the hulk, ironman, and the other movies marvel is doing. (not counting series like spiderman and xmen, obviously)

idk, if you want you can consider these movies prequels to avengers, but that still doesn't seem write to me.

 

[LightningFlash]

Well I'm not ignorant; I know TIH isn't Iron Man's "traditional" sequel, but within the Avengers Universe, which what I was saying earlier.

 

[Immortalfire]

They're planning it that way.

Iron Man II and Thor in 2010, Captain America and Avengers in 2011.

Because...Iron Man is supposed to be the first, Hulk is supposed to be "its" sequel.

Iron Man II is supposed to be first, and Thor is supposed to be "its" sequel.

And Avengers is supposed to be the working sequel with Cap.

 

[Chris Wallace]

Well I'm not ignorant; I know TIH isn't Iron Man's "traditional" sequel, but within the Avengers Universe, which what I was saying earlier.

Is "Jason Goes To Hell" a sequel to "Nightmare On Elm Street"?
Is "Coming To America" a sequel to "Trading Places"?

 

[LightningFlash]

I don't watch garbage regarding Jason or Freddy....

and saying that about Coming to America and Trading Places...I get the sarcasm, and you can take it as you will, but I'm just stating all of the Iron Man, Hulk, Thor and Captain America films are, and, will be prequels to the Avengers within their new continuity that they(Marvel) have started.

I was just stating pretty much facts. Don't believe me and try to sound smart, go ahead.

 

[Chris Wallace]

My point is, a cameo does not a sequel make.

 

[LightningFlash]

My point is, a cameo does not a sequel make.

Okay.

I am just stating these movies are becoming PREQUELS for the Avengers movie. And there has to be SOME connection as to why there will be two movie per year, and that connection, wether you want to take it lightly, is a some-what of a "sequel".

Iron Man --> The Incredible Hulk --> Iron Man II --> Thor --> The First Avenger: Captain America --> The Avengers --> Iron Man III

I was only explaining about Captain America and The Avengers being releases in 2011. And then explained the purposed Avengers Universe that Marvel is trying to create.

I'm not gonna re-explain myself anymore. Over it.

 

[FaT_tONle]

Don't use the terms sequels and prequels when you are talking soley about a timeline/continuity because that is misleading. TIH is not a sequel to IM... just an event (more like a scene) after IM.

 

[LightningFlash]

Pretty sure I can use the terms if I want.

 

[Kirk Langstrom]

I am also in the same boat with delaying Avengers... Marvel's slate is ridiculous... I am convinced they have no clue how they are going to make this thing work. I could see both Cap AND Avengers getting pushed back at least a year. SM4 will take the May 2011 release away from Marvel IMO... and BB3 will settle into the July spot... the way it should have been... I love Marvel and respect what their independent studio has done up until now but they just need to understand their place. Warner Bros/Sony need those release dates as well.

Agreed.

 

[Venom 1988]

Okay.

I am just stating these movies are becoming PREQUELS for the Avengers movie. And there has to be SOME connection as to why there will be two movie per year, and that connection, wether you want to take it lightly, is a some-what of a "sequel".

Iron Man --> The Incredible Hulk --> Iron Man II --> Thor --> The First Avenger: Captain America --> The Avengers --> Iron Man III

I was only explaining about Captain America and The Avengers being releases in 2011. And then explained the purposed Avengers Universe that Marvel is trying to create.

I'm not gonna re-explain myself anymore. Over it.

Yea Christ cut LightingFlash some slack, there not prequel/sequels in the traditional sense duh we know that, they are individual franchises. But they are apart of the same universe and are setting up a larger future movie.

 

[scatterax]

Yea Christ cut LightingFlash some slack, there not prequel/sequels in the traditional sense duh we know that, they are individual franchises. But they are apart of the same universe and are setting up a larger future movie.

they're not prequel or sequels at all though.

they're just movie franchises that are connected. the incredible hulk was NOT a continuation of iron man, so by definition it was NOT a sequel.

these movies are in a whole new category that cannot be discribed as prequels or sequels. it's like the dc animated universe in the 90s. static shock was part of that universe, and batman was in a few episodes of that show, but static shock was in no way a sequel to B:TAS. same basic principle applies here.

 

[I Am The Knight]

Not to mention that Louis Leterrier, in his Hulk commentary, describes TIH ending with Banner's smirk at the camera, and calls the subsequent bar bit "the first scene of The Avengers" He doesn't even believes it's part of the same movie.

 

[scatterax]

Not to mention that Louis Leterrier, in his Hulk commentary, describes TIH ending with Banner's smirk at the camera, and calls the subsequent bar bit "the first scene of The Avengers" He doesn't even believes it's part of the same movie.

good point

 

[Venom 1988]

they're not prequel or sequels at all though.

they're just movie franchises that are connected. the incredible hulk was NOT a continuation of iron man, so by definition it was NOT a sequel.

these movies are in a whole new category that cannot be discribed as prequels or sequels. it's like the dc animated universe in the 90s. static shock was part of that universe, and batman was in a few episodes of that show, but static shock was in no way a sequel to B:TAS. same basic principle applies here.

Yea I know that, all I'm saying is to cut the guy some slack. He chose his words in correctly and everyone jumps on him saying "O noes there not sequels!"

 

[FaT_tONle]

Pretty sure I can use the terms if I want.

Yeah and I can make up new definitions for existing words if I want too...

 

[Mario_Galaxy]

I'm curious, are they going the Returns/TMNT 4 route and just ignoring 3?