Sequels Sony is thinking May 2011 for Spidey 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't be a complete and utter ass. You know damn well that's not what I meant by a mature and complex Spider-Man. The story-arc Kraven's Last Hunt is mature and complex. But it can't be adapted in its raw form, because it doesn't fit Marvel/Sony's Hannah Montana mentality that they have created for these films.

You know CaptainStacy, you'll one of the reasons why we have a Peter Parker who dances like Jim Carrey in THE MASK, instead of an intelligent speaking and confident Peter Parker of the comics. You're the reason why an A-List villain like the Green Goblin looks like a Power Ranger and recites nursery rhymes. You're the reason we have simple storytelling that has MJ being kidnapped by every villain, as not to confuse kids with an actual meaningful script. You're the reason we have villains whom are not bad nor evil.

You're the audience whom Marvel/Sony are trying to cater to, and are losing quality and the respect of the franchise in the process. The movies are unable to expand, branch out, explore new territories of Spider-Man's methos because of the juvenile, childlike, product placement, boy band box that holds these films hostage. :o


Well Said... Very Well Said. You will be missed... "Oscar" :down:
 
So Lee/Ditko/Romita gave us the Clone GweMJ that we have in the movies, and they gave us the "it's all about one girl" in their comics.

They "did" give us some of Spidey's greatest storylines, storylines that we have not seen in the movies. Capt Stacy's death, Peter's Love of his life hating and blaming his alter-ego for her father's death, Peter's Love of his life being killed by his greatest foe (Green Goblin), Spidey getting no respect or appreciation (a recurring theme, see Gwen blaming/hating Spidey above)...

where we DID get the Spidey Day in NYC... you got to be kidding me???

Guess we can chalk that up to the ole Parker Luck from the conics eh?

NOT

So yes... It is a "Bad Thing".

And no, I am NOT saying Spider-Man franchise is a waste, or was bad, it was good, it is just that it could have "easily" been GREAT if they had stuck more to the blueprint called the comics.
It's Sam's film. As i have said, he combines his ideas with stuff from the comics. What's so bad about that? There; no point in making a film if you can only take ideas from source Material. It's always good, well, half of the amount of time to mash source material and your own ideas togeather to satisfy everyone.
 
"Very mature post" :whatever:

God Forebid anyone have a critical opinion of Spider-Man... or worse.. one that disagrees with "your" opinion. One might get banned for it.

Excuse me; do i KNOW you? I certainly seem to have made some sort of an impression on you, that you feel the need to make comments on all my posts.

If you're looking to "hook up" or whatever, look elsewhere, junior.

CaptainStacy walks the STRAIGHT and narrow. :word:
 
No, that's not an accusation.

I will say that I will miss Visionary. In the short amount of time that I knew him for, he entertained the hell out of me :up:
 
It's Sam's film. As i have said, he combines his ideas with stuff from the comics. What's so bad about that? There; no point in making a film if you can only take ideas from source Material. It's always good, well, half of the amount of time to mash source material and your own ideas togeather to satisfy everyone.

Funny how you advocate the greatness of the likes of Lee/Ditko/Romita but then say it's Raimi's film, and that gives him the right to assasinate characters (MJ/Peter/Gwen/etc.) and storylines (Sandman is Uncle Ben's Killer/All about a girl). Wow.

Guess we will just have to agree to disagree, with reasoning like that.
 
Excuse me; do i KNOW you? I certainly seem to have made some sort of an impression on you, that you feel the need to make comments on all my posts.

If you're looking to "hook up" or whatever, look elsewhere, junior.

CaptainStacy walks the STRAIGHT and narrow. :word:

LOL... Very.. VERY mature "old man"

1) trying to attack me by inferring I am gay
2) so insecure you resort to cheap puns about your own sexual orientation
3) Speaking about yourself in First Person...
4) So let me get this straight, you can "quote" my posts, but I am not allowed to quote yours??? Sounds like a 5 year old saying either we play by my rules or I'm gonna take my ball and run home to Mommie...

LOL.... Priceless!!!

:woot:
 
LOL... Very.. VERY mature "old man"

1) trying to attack me by inferring I am gay
2) so insecure you resort to cheap puns about your own sexual orientation
3) Speaking about yourself in First Person...
4) So let me get this straight, you can "quote" my posts, but I am not allowed to quote yours??? Sounds like a 5 year old saying either we play by my rules or I'm gonna take my ball and run home to Mommie...

LOL.... Priceless!!!

:woot:

Sure. Whatever you say, sweetpea. :yay:
 
Funny how you advocate the greatness of the likes of Lee/Ditko/Romita but then say it's Raimi's film, and that gives him the right to assasinate characters (MJ/Peter/Gwen/etc.) and storylines (Sandman is Uncle Ben's Killer/All about a girl). Wow.

Guess we will just have to agree to disagree, with reasoning like that.

What's the problem with Sandman being Uncle Ben's "killer" ? What does it matter, in the end? Peter still was selfish when he was supposed to use his abilities to stop a felony that got his uncle killed, this criminal still caused Uncle Ben's "murder", Peter still learned a valuable lesson that changed his life forever which resonated throughout all three films and is arguably the back bone of the trilogy. This nobody, this Sandman...Becomes Peter's Joe Chill and that changes nothing really.

And the story is not "all about a girl" ... The films are about maturing, about using power for the benefit of society, about responsibility, growing up. Sure, the girl is in the center of it all, but in a movie dealing with a teenage lead, what do you expect.
 
What's the problem with Sandman being Uncle Ben's "killer" ? What does it matter, in the end? Peter still was selfish when he was supposed to use his abilities to stop a felony that got his uncle killed, this criminal still caused Uncle Ben's "murder", Peter still learned a valuable lesson that changed his life forever which resonated throughout all three films and is arguably the back bone of the trilogy. This nobody, this Sandman...Becomes Peter's Joe Chill and that changes nothing really.

And the story is not "all about a girl" ... The films are about maturing, about using power for the benefit of society, about responsibility, growing up. Sure, the girl is in the center of it all, but in a movie dealing with a teenage lead, what do you expect.

The franchise open by stating "it's all about a girl, that girl, Mary Jane Watson".

As far as Sandman is concern... it cheapen his character unnecessarily and changes a hallmark point in his life that should nevered had been touch. Would you say it didn't matter if Venom droped Gwen of the bridge. Some things should never be altered.

IMHO.
 
The franchise open by stating "it's all about a girl, that girl, Mary Jane Watson".

As far as Sandman is concern... it cheapen his character unnecessarily and changes a hallmark point in his life that should nevered had been touch. Would you say it didn't matter if Venom droped Gwen of the bridge. Some things should never be altered.

IMHO.

I'm aware of that infamous line. But would you go with what the character feels like telling you or with what the films are actually about? If we followed that logic, people would think that Batman Begins is all about "Fear" which is far from the truth. Some people do, actually, now that I think about it. Oh well.

Now, I'm not sure how important Sandman was in the comics, but are you comparing him to Osborn now? I don't get the vibe that Sandman was a huge character in which making him involved with Ben's murder would be such a travesty.
 
ok, i'm all for differing opinions, but this thread is getting weird. (i don't plan to name names.)
 
First... the trilogy of films has been solely about Peter and the girl Mary Jane first, and everything else second. Batman was about fear... that was the reason he travel the world over to learn to deal with his greatest fear. Once he overcame that fear, he understood how to defeat it... which led him to help the city of Gotham overcome their fear of organized crime. Come on man, you appear to be a Batman, surely you pick that up over the course of the film. That's what all the villains in both films motives was amongst other things.

And like Batman, the film opened explaining exactly the thesis of the film was... or in this case the trilogy. Every decision Peter made, was based on him geting the girl, Mary Jane.

Now, as far as Sandman and the Uncle Ben saga... if you don't get it, than there is nothing I can say that will help you understand the bad taste that story arc left in many mouths. Not only was it an injustice to Sandman's character, but the forgiveness, daughter, familyman thing, "I didn't ask for this", accidental killing, etc was a travesty.

That's just me.
 
I'm aware of that infamous line. But would you go with what the character feels like telling you or with what the films are actually about?

But it's true what Peter said, IMO. Practically everything he does is dictated by his love for MJ. What was he doing when he gotten bitten by the spider? Taking pics of MJ. He went to the wrestling arena simply because he wanted to make money to buy a car so he could impress MJ. Tension builds between him and Harry because Harry starts dating MJ. Peter has to save MJ three seperate times in SM-1.
The opening of SM-2 is a close up shot of MJ's face with Peter wittering on about how much he loves her and how he can't be with her because he's Spidey. His powers start to go out when ever some kind of MJ related heartbreak happens. Even Otto's line "If you keep something as complicated as love stored up inside, it can make you sick" is a fore warning to the viewers of what's about to happen. He tries to get with MJ when he gives up being Spidey. Then when she's kidnapped by Ock, that's what gives him the kick up the ass to put on the costume again and his powers return full force.

I wont even get into the nightmare that was their so called relationship in SM-3! I love Spider-Man 1 and 2, but I'm under no illusion that it is exactly as Peter said, it's all about the girl. And that does weaken the story, IMO.
 
Venom'sDad said:
First... the trilogy of films has been solely about Peter and the girl Mary Jane first, and everything else second. Batman was about fear... that was the reason he travel the world over to learn to deal with his greatest fear. Once he overcame that fear, he understood how to defeat it... which led him to help the city of Gotham overcome their fear of organized crime. Come on man, you appear to be a Batman, surely you pick that up over the course of the film. That's what all the villains in both films motives was amongst other things.

Yes, the film beat you over the head with the idea of "fear" but that is not the only theme in the film. I'd say it has more to do with the classic "Hero's Journey" than anything else. Batman Begins deals with the loss of innocence, survivor's guilt and anger, sense of loss, the psychological effect that a murder has on an inocent soul, justice against retribution, vigilantism and what kind of person it takes to do something as extreme as that, rebirth, becoming a man, the aformentioned journey of a man who is "lost" and will never be the same....And yes, fear :hehe:

And like Batman, the film opened explaining exactly the thesis of the film was... or in this case the trilogy. Every decision Peter made, was based on him geting the girl, Mary Jane.

Doesn't change the fact that the films themselves play as something more than that. I certainly never got that vibe. Superficially, yeah. I see other themes emphasized.

Now, as far as Sandman and the Uncle Ben saga... if you don't get it, than there is nothing I can say that will help you understand the bad taste that story arc left in many mouths. Not only was it an injustice to Sandman's character, but the forgiveness, daughter, familyman thing, "I didn't ask for this", accidental killing, etc was a travesty.

That's just me.

No, I do enjoy Sandman being involved with Uncle Ben's murder. I think you meant to say the opposite. It does not change the fact that Peter made a decision in SM1 to become a hero and to honor Ben, he learned his lesson. He still is responsible for Ben's murder, although in not such a direct level anymore. But Peter still grew from it. Then SM3 introduced the Sandman thing. It opened new possibilities. Where they executed properly? No, not entirely. But the concept is not flawed, the execution was. Same goes for the entire film, really.

Joker said:
But it's true what Peter said, IMO. Practically everything he does is dictated by his love for MJ. What was he doing when he gotten bitten by the spider? Taking pics of MJ.

Haha, some of the examples here are just ridiculous, my friend. He was taking pics of MJ while he was bitten by a spider? What are you implying? That it's because of MJ that he's Spider-Man? Technically, one could say so. It seems like a stretch to me, though. More like Raimi deciding he needed to make the biting incident one of those cutesy moments in the film, and nothing more.

He went to the wrestling arena simply because he wanted to make money to buy a car so he could impress MJ.

But what matters is what happened afterwards. MJ didn't make Peter a cocky bastard that got his uncle killed and started the whole hero business.

Tension builds between him and Harry because Harry starts dating MJ.

But they remain buddies essentially. Tension really stars brewing between them when Harry finds out that Parker is friends with his father's killer, and when he finds out he and Spider-Man happen to be the same person, the full on hatred begins. MJ? She's just the beginning :hehe:

Peter has to save MJ three seperate times in SM-1.

As do all superheroes with their respective damsels in distress.

The opening of SM-2 is a close up shot of MJ's face with Peter wittering on about how much he loves her and how he can't be with her because he's Spidey.

Reminding us of the classic dilemma of the superhero. Most superhero movies have this. Raimi emphasizes it for his teen audience, but for me, it's not the core.

His powers start to go out when ever some kind of MJ related heartbreak happens. Even Otto's line "If you keep something as complicated as love stored up inside, it can make you sick" is a fore warning to the viewers of what's about to happen.

Yes, MJ plays a big part in Peter's breakdown. But it's not the only thing. His life is a mess; he's a loser who's f**** beyond belief, has no consistent life, gets belittled by strangers, has no money, etc, etc. When MJ, who he intesely loves, happens to accept Jameson's proposal, it's really the last straw for him.

He tries to get with MJ when he gives up being Spidey. Then when she's kidnapped by Ock, that's what gives him the kick up the ass to put on the costume again and his powers return full force.

When your loves ones are in danger, you're likely to get that kind of "power" into your body, the drive to do great feats.

I wont even get into the nightmare that was their so called relationship in SM-3! I love Spider-Man 1 and 2, but I'm under no illusion that it is exactly as Peter said, it's all about the girl. And that does weaken the story, IMO.

Like I said, it's one of the aspects, a BIG one, but not the only one and not the most important.

While I can be fond of Peter and MJ's portrayal in SM3 as a couple breaking apart who can't communicate, the way they handled themselves, their self absortion, reeked of idiocy in many occasions.
 
Last edited:
Haha, some of the examples here are just ridiculous, my friend. He was taking pics of MJ while he was bitten by a spider? What are you implying? That it's because of MJ that he's Spider-Man?

No, I'm saying that at practically every pivotal moment, MJ is a cause or effect. When Peter was bitten by the spider, he was so engrossed in taking pics of MJ that he didn't see it land on his hand. He wasn't talking to Harry. He wasn't listening to the instructor. He wasn't gazing in awe at the advanced electron microscope.

He was dreamily taking pics of MJ.

But what matters is what happened afterwards. MJ didn't make Peter a cocky bastard that got his uncle killed and started the whole hero business.

You're missing the point entirely. Peter wouldn't even have been in that situation in the first place if not for his lust for MJ. He went there for the sole purpose to make cash to get a car to impress her.

You understand? He wouldn't have been there in the first place if not for her. She was his reason for being there. Not because he wanted to make cash for himself. Not because he wanted to try out his new powers like in the comics.

It was for MJ.

But they remain buddies essentially. Tension really stars brewing between them when Harry finds out that Parker is friends with his father's killer, and when he finds out he and Spider-Man happen to be the same person, the full on hatred begins. MJ? She's just the beginning

No, MJ was a huge catalyst in their hostilites, and is used so in the next two movies, particularly in SM-3. Harry ***** slaps Peter in SM-2, accusing him of stealing MJ from him, among other things. Harry and MJ kiss in SM-3, and he uses her to break Peter's heart, which again kick starts a cascade of events, include Peter using Gwen to try and make MJ jealous because MJ dumped Peter at Harry's order :whatever:

What makes it even worse is the fact that MJ was never even interested in Harry in the first place. She uses him like she uses John to fill a void.

As do all superheroes with their respective damsels in distress.

Three seperate times in ONE movie? Kidnapped by every villain in a trilogy of movies? LOL! Come off it.

Reminding us of the classic dilemma of the superhero. Most superhero movies have this. Raimi emphasizes it for his teen audience, but for me, it's not the core.

No, it's reminding the audience that this hero's focal point is MJ. Reminding the audience that it's "All about the girl". No other superhero movie has the hero so engrossed in a woman like that.

You're probably right about the teen audience though. I reckon that's why it's all about the girl. For the teenage fans.

Yes, MJ plays a big part in Peter's breakdown. But it's not the only thing. His life is a mess; he's a loser who's f**** beyond belief, has no consistent life, gets belittled by strangers, has no money, etc, etc. When MJ, who he intesely loves, happens to accept Jameson's proposal, it's really the last straw for him.

Nope. The first time his powers go on the blink is when he sees MJ kissing John outside the theatre. That's the first time they complete go out on him and falls from the sky. His powers never went out after any of his other problems. Only after heartache with MJ.

This again is hammered into the audience with Otto's line. And if that's not enough to convince you, when Peter has the dream about Uncle Ben in the heaven car, Ben gives him the spiel about power and responsibility, and Peter's response is "Can't you understand? I'm in love with Mary Jane". He doesn't mention school troubles, or friendship troubles, or money troubles etc.

Now how much more clearer do they need to make it?

When your loves ones are in danger, you're likely to get that kind of "power" into your body, the drive to do great feats.

And what a coincidence that MJ was that loved one when it happened :hehe: :cwink:

Like I said, it's one of the aspects, a BIG one, but not the only one and not the most important.

Can't say I agree. Especially with the way Raimi present it in the movies.
 
Last edited:
It's always about the man behind the mask. A person's true heroism. Demonstrated in SM2 with the flaming building. Mirroring the scene in SM2 but with Peter. It shows true heroism comes from the will of the person. Superpowers don't make up for that. It's just something you think will help you. If the will of the people is there, you will always win.
there's nothing wrong with showing that, but Spider-Man should still be the focus or there should be a balance, like in the previous movies. in SM3 Raimi simply forgot that Peter was also Spider-Man. there were times where I was begging to see Spider-Man doing anything instead of all that unecessary romantic bull*****. Peter and MJ's love was settled. it didn't need to be touched and valuable screen time was lost with that, which could be used with something more interesting and intelligent, such as development for the villains.
 
No, I'm saying that at practically every pivotal moment, MJ is a cause or effect. When Peter was bitten by the spider, he was so engrossed in taking pics of MJ that he didn't see it land on his hand. He wasn't talking to Harry. He wasn't listening to the instructor. He wasn't gazing in awe at the advanced electron microscope.

He was dreamily taking pics of MJ.

Kinda like...Bruce being engrossed with Rachel while playing "I'll show you mine if you show me yours" in the mansion. One of the most pivotal moments in Bruce Wayne's life, and if it wasn't for the fact that Rachel was there playing with him, the Waynes might still be alive. Like with the radioactive spider bit, it doesn't mean anything unless you want it to. It's pointless.

You're missing the point entirely. Peter wouldn't even have been in that situation in the first place if not for his lust for MJ. He went there for the sole purpose to make cash to get a car to impress her.

Yes...But...

You understand?

:whatever:

He wouldn't have been there in the first place if not for her. She was his reason for being there. Not because he wanted to make cash for himself. Not because he wanted to try out his new powers like in the comics.

It was for MJ.

And again, the fact that she drove him to do that silly wrestling thing is irrelevant, like Rachel at the mansion. It does not change the fact that Peter learned a tremendous life lesson the hard way, it does not change the fact that he was irresponsible. That's what matters. Him wanting to buy a car to impress MJ becomes a minute detail after what happens that night. And surely wanting to try his powers might have something to do with it. Pre radioactive spider Peter would've never even dreamed of doing something like that.

No, MJ was a huge catalyst in their hostilites, and is used so in the next two movies, particularly in SM-3. Harry ***** slaps Peter in SM-2, accusing him of stealing MJ from him, among other things.

Oh come on. He was drunk. His main problem with Parker in that scene is his relationship with Spider-Man. MJ is a secondary thing. Just more ammo for Harry to use against Parker, but not the real reason they are breaking apart. This you know :hehe:

Harry and MJ kiss in SM-3, and he uses her to break Peter's heart, which again kick starts a cascade of events, include Peter using Gwen to try and make MJ jealous because MJ dumped Peter at Harry's order :whatever:

HAHAHA! Don't remind me. But anyway, what else is he going to do? He is supposed to go against Spider-Man's loved ones.

What makes it even worse is the fact that MJ was never even interested in Harry in the first place. She uses him like she uses John to fill a void.

Movie MJ has self steem issues, allright.

Three seperate times in ONE movie? Kidnapped by every villain in a trilogy of movies? LOL! Come off it.

Yes, the kidnapping is ridiculous. But Rachel Dawes had to be saved 3 times in BB as well, and 2 times in TDK, one of which caused her death :o Had they kept her alive, you bet she would've been in danger in the next one, too.

No, it's reminding the audience that this hero's focal point is MJ. Reminding the audience that it's "All about the girl". No other superhero movie has the hero so engrossed in a woman like that.

You can choose to be distracted by that. Superficially, it's all about a girl. On a deeper level, it's all about growing up.

You're probably right about the teen audience though. I reckon that's why it's all about the girl. For the teenage fans.

And pre-teen.

Nope. The first time his powers go on the blink is when he sees MJ kissing John outside the theatre. That's the first time they complete go out on him and falls from the sky. His powers never went out after any of his other problems. Only after heartache with MJ.

I'll have to check the movie again but I take your word for it on the timeframe. But even then, you still have plenty of scenes prior to that showing Parker's horrible life, how's he doing even worse than before. I see it as the last straw. Spider-Man never losed his powers while watching MJ with Harry in SM1. He never lost his powers after he ditched her at the end of SM1. In SM3, he never loses his powers after she ditches him, for Harry, for godsakes! In SM2, it is an accumulation of unfortunate events for our loser hero, but she's the last straw. You cannot ignore this.

This again is hammered into the audience with Otto's line. And if that's not enough to convince you, when Peter has the dream about Uncle Ben in the heaven car, Ben gives him the spiel about power and responsibility, and Peter's response is "Can't you understand? I'm in love with Mary Jane". He doesn't mention school troubles, or friendship troubles, or money troubles etc.

Now how much more clearer do they need to make it?

"Can't you understand, Papa? I'm not raking in the cash" :hehe:

What sounds more compelling to you? While the line itself is very incriminating, as a viewer, you know that there's more to it. You have seen it for about an hour in to that point. Once he gives up being Spider-Man, his life gets back on track. He gets good grades, has a relaxed nature to him, does a pre-SM3 strut down the streets of NY, and eventually tries to win MJ back, naturally. It's a combination of it all, my lad.

Just to clarify my position on this: I'm not saying MJ does not play a BIG role in the movies, at all. I'm saying, it's not ALL about her, even though one could surely make a good case for that notion.

And what a coincidence that MJ was that loved one when it happened :hehe: :cwink:

I'm sure Aunt Carnage would've elicited a similar response from him.
 
Last edited:
Kinda like...Bruce being engrossed with Rachel while playing "I'll show you mine if you show me yours" in the mansion. One of the most pivotal moments in Bruce Wayne's life, and if it wasn't for the fact that Rachel was there playing with him, the Waynes might still be alive. Like with the radioactive spider bit, it doesn't mean anything unless you want it to. It's pointless.

Oh come on, man, that's hardly the same at all. That was a child being a child playing hide and seek in his own garden with a friend. Could have happened at any time in any number of circumstances.

Can you say Peter would have gone to the wrestling arena to get money for any reason other than he wanted to impress MJ? No. Money wasn't a major issue with him back then. He was setting up with rich boy Harry Osborn in a cushy apartment Norman was getting them.

It was all extremely specific. He needed money to get a car because MJ had been so impressed with Flash's car. That led him to designing the Spider-Man costume, and even getting his Spider-Man name. Like I said, cause and effect.

Yes...But...

But what?


Sorry, I didn't mean to come across as condescending.

And again, the fact that she drove him to do that silly wrestling thing is irrelevant, like Rachel at the mansion. It does not change the fact that Peter learned a tremendous life lesson the hard way, it does not change the fact that he was irresponsible. That's what matters. Him wanting to buy a car to impress MJ becomes a minute detail after what happens that night.

I've addressed this point above.

Peter wanting to impress MJ was even raised again in SM-2 when he confesses his role in Uncle Ben's death to Aunt May. "I went some place because I wanted money to buy a car so I could impress Mary Jane". Raimi was once again reminding us there what led Peter to those events.

It's like nothing can happen without MJ being involved in some way.

And surely wanting to try his powers might have something to do with it. Pre radioactive spider Peter would've never even dreamed of doing something like that.

Pre radioactive Peter didn't have the strength to enter into a wrestling contest. But his reason for being there wasn't to try out his powers.

He read the Newspaper advert for the wrestling match which offered $2000, which he needed after he had been checking out car prices in that same newspaper. The camera literally pans down from the car prices to the wrestling ad.

It was clear as day, mate.

Oh come on. He was drunk. His main problem with Parker in that scene is his relationship with Spider-Man. MJ is a secondary thing. Just more ammo for Harry to use against Parker, but not the real reason they are breaking apart. This you know

Of course the main reason was Spider-Man. But again, MJ had to be in there as ONE of the reasons why he was hostile towards Peter. And he used his connection with MJ, and Peter's love for MJ against Peter.

HAHAHA! Don't remind me. But anyway, what else is he going to do? He is supposed to go against Spider-Man's loved ones.

Why didn't he attack Aunt May at all? Harry did so in the comics in ASM #137. Why not be original for once and not have MJ used as the bait? And then she's kidnapped AGAIN later on by Venom and Sandman.

Yeeeeeeesh!!!

Yes, the kidnapping is ridiculous. But Rachel Dawes had to be saved 3 times in BB as well, and 2 times in TDK, one of which caused her death :o Had they kept her alive, you bet she would've been in danger in the next one, too.

But again, the difference was that Dawes was a district attorney fighting corruption in Gotham. She placed herself in dangerous situations by fighting the mob and corruption. Of course she was going to be targeted. All the good city officials were targeted.

Not like with MJ, where the villains went out and kidnapped her for the same reason every time, as bait for Spider-Man. And this never raises eyebrows with the Police, either. Broadway actress with a history of being kidnapped by every super villain that rears their head lol.

You can choose to be distracted by that. Superficially, it's all about a girl. On a deeper level, it's all about growing up.

It might well be about growing up. It's just that most of Peter's growing up revolved around MJ.

I'll have to check the movie again but I take your word for it on the timeframe. But even then, you still have plenty of scenes prior to that showing Parker's horrible life, how's he doing even worse than before. I see it as the last straw. Spider-Man never losed his powers while watching MJ with Harry in SM1.

Because there's no real affection or emotion between them. MJ shys away from kissing Harry on the lips at the unity festival, and Peter sees that. They have a big row at thanksgiving. And she makes it clear that things are not going well with Harry with Peter asks how's it going between them.

He never lost his powers after he ditched her at the end of SM1.

Because that was his decision.

In SM3, he never loses his powers after she ditches him, for Harry, for godsakes!

Because he's consumed with anger and rage when Harry tells him he's the other guy. What happens next? He puts the symbiote on, which amplifies his powers.

In SM2, it is an accumulation of unfortunate events for our loser hero, but she's the last straw. You cannot ignore this.

I don't, because I as I addressed above, I don't believe it to be true. I think MJ is is main reason for losing his powers. Yeah, he has other problems, but from what we're told, he's had them for the longest time.

His landlord says he's late again with the rent, indicating this seems to happen alot. His boss at the Pizza parlour says he's always late. Dr Conners says Peter's grades have been declining for a long time, and that he always late for class, and always appears exhausted.

But none of these caused even the slightest short circuit in his powers. But when he claps eyes on MJ with a new guy, BAM! The powers go out.

"Can't you understand, Papa? I'm not raking in the cash"

:huh:

What sounds more compelling to you? While the line itself is very incriminating, as a viewer, you know that there's more to it. You have seen it for about an hour in to that point. Once he gives up being Spider-Man, his life gets back on track. He gets good grades, has a relaxed nature to him

Yes, because he has the time to do all that. But it's MJ whom he again seeks out and tries to get with, even though she's engaged to another man!!!

Why doesn't he try and make peace with Harry, his best friend who is hurting and sinking into alcoholism, instead of trying to score with an engaged woman? Because it's ALL ABOUT THE GIRL!!!!! :hehe:

does a pre-SM3 strut down the streets of NY, and eventually tries to win MJ back, naturally. It's a combination of it all, my lad.

No, my lad, it certainly is not. Peter's other problems are presented as an after thought. The crux of his emotional turmoil is MJ.

Just to clarify my position on this: I'm not saying MJ does not play a BIG role in the movies, at all. I'm saying, it's not ALL about her, even though one could surely make a good case for that notion.

I would agree, but practically everything in Peter's life involves MJ in some way. She even triggers major events in Peter's life. He goes and does stuff because of her, and this leads him into other events. But at the core, it was MJ that led to it.

And I don't like that. One of the best things about Spider-Man 2 was Aunt May. Peter trying to help her get her mortgage sorted in the bank was a welcome oasis because it was an MJ free act, and it involved someone else Peter loves.

If we saw alot more of that, then Raimi would be getting it right.

I'm sure Aunt Carnage would've elicited a similar response from him.

I'm sure. Unfortunately MJ is always the one they use.
 
Last edited:
Whenever has Peter Parker been "cool?" Show me where he has. Even when he is Spider-Man he still is a nerd.

Haven't you heard? Witty nerds are cool in this day and age.
 
Last edited:
there's nothing wrong with showing that, but Spider-Man should still be the focus or there should be a balance, like in the previous movies. in SM3 Raimi simply forgot that Peter was also Spider-Man. there were times where I was begging to see Spider-Man doing anything instead of all that unecessary romantic bull*****. Peter and MJ's love was settled. it didn't need to be touched and valuable screen time was lost with that, which could be used with something more interesting and intelligent, such as development for the villains.

Couldn't have said it better myself! Cheers!
 
ok, mj is an important character who plays an important part in these movies, but it's not all about her. she's not the main character, spidey is. and the villains like green goblin, doc ock and sandman have just as much influence on peter and the stories as mj. maybe even more. and lets not forget about uncle ben. w/ just his few scenes he's just as important as mj.

so maybe a third of the story, at most is about mj. in reallity it's all about spidey.

movie 1 is about spiderman's rise from nobody nerd to hero. (not mj herself)

movie 2 is about him ballancing his normal life w/ his hero responcibilitys. (not just mj)

movie 3 is about... um, pride?? for now i'm going w/ "it's about spiderman struggle to do good instead of giving ni to selfish desires". (and only 1 of those is mj)

see, mj is just 1 part in spidermans story. and not even the biggest part. spiderman didn't exactly become spiderman just so he could save mj 3 times a weak.
 
Oh come on, man, that's hardly the same at all. That was a child being a child playing hide and seek in his own garden with a friend. Could have happened at any time in any number of circumstances.

I don't think Bruce had any more friends, really. I get that homely vibe from him, and considering Rachel seems to spend time at the mansion thanks to her mother, it's natural that they become friends. If Rachel didn't exist, he would probably be with Alfie or his parents. The film never shows us that Bruce's world was bigger than Parents-Rachel-Afred.

Can you say Peter would have gone to the wrestling arena to get money for any reason other than he wanted to impress MJ? No. Money wasn't a major issue with him back then. He was setting up with rich boy Harry Osborn in a cushy apartment Norman was getting them.

Was that established at that point at all? The Harry part?

It was all extremely specific. He needed money to get a car because MJ had been so impressed with Flash's car. That led him to designing the Spider-Man costume, and even getting his Spider-Man name. Like I said, cause and effect.

What led him to do all those things was...The Radioactive Spider that gave him his spider powers. MJ didn't wear a spider outfit or whatever to cause him to do that. Why he picked the name should be obvious.

But what?

Sorry, I didn't specify that I was addressing the rest of that below in my previous post.

Sorry, I didn't mean to come across as condescending.

No problem.

I've addressed this point above.

Peter wanting to impress MJ was even raised again in SM-2 when he confesses his role in Uncle Ben's death to Aunt May. "I went some place because I wanted money to buy a car so I could impress Mary Jane". Raimi was once again reminding us there what led Peter to those events.

It's like nothing can happen without MJ being involved in some way.

Yeah, she was the reason why he was there, but she didn't influence his state of mind in which he became cocky, something that actually lead to his Uncle's murder in a more direct manner.

Pre radioactive Peter didn't have the strength to enter into a wrestling contest. But his reason for being there wasn't to try out his powers.

Certainly not the main one, but agreed.

He read the Newspaper advert for the wrestling match which offered $2000, which he needed after he had been checking out car prices in that same newspaper. The camera literally pans down from the car prices to the wrestling ad.

It was clear as day, mate.

Read above.

Of course the main reason was Spider-Man. But again, MJ had to be in there as ONE of the reasons why he was hostile towards Peter. And he used his connection with MJ, and Peter's love for MJ against Peter.

As you said, one thing. Not the main thing. Raimi's obsession with Dunst rears it's ugly head, but it's still not about her.

Why didn't he attack Aunt May at all? Harry did so in the comics in ASM #137. Why not be original for once and not have MJ used as the bait? And then she's kidnapped AGAIN later on by Venom and Sandman.

Yeeeeeeesh!!!

Because Raimi feels the audience cares more about MJ, I'd wager.

But again, the difference was that Dawes was a district attorney fighting corruption in Gotham. She placed herself in dangerous situations by fighting the mob and corruption. Of course she was going to be targeted. All the good city officials were targeted.

And MJ is Parker/Spider Man's friend/f*** buddy/girlfriend. Of course she's gonna get targeted. Parker mentions this out loud in SM2. I don't like the rehashing, but that's the reasoning behind it.

Not like with MJ, where the villains went out and kidnapped her for the same reason every time, as bait for Spider-Man. And this never raises eyebrows with the Police, either. Broadway actress with a history of being kidnapped by every super villain that rears their head lol.

LOL. Raimi's Spider-Man lives in a magical world where every single female in NYC is young and beautiful/hot, and no one notices Spider-Man flying out of a certain apartment window on a constant basis.

It might well be about growing up. It's just that most of Peter's growing up revolved around MJ.

Can't say I really agree.

Because there's no real affection or emotion between them. MJ shys away from kissing Harry on the lips at the unity festival, and Peter sees that. They have a big row at thanksgiving. And she makes it clear that things are not going well with Harry with Peter asks how's it going between them.

But it's still the girl he loves. With his best friend. Surely that would create more conflict for him?

Because that was his decision.

Sure it was, even though he didn't really want to. But shouldn't that have caused more conflict for him? If MJ is really what powers Parker up.

Because he's consumed with anger and rage when Harry tells him he's the other guy. What happens next? He puts the symbiote on, which amplifies his powers.

But there is no indication that he loses his powers after MJ dumps him. And I find it hard to believe that Harry called him to meet him at that cafe literally 5 minutes after the fact. In SM2, as you've said, these power slips always happened right after an MJ incident :hehe: And if the symbiote amplifies his powers, then, it couldn't have possibly amplified something that wasn't there. Parker was fine.

I don't, because I as I addressed above, I don't believe it to be true. I think MJ is is main reason for losing his powers. Yeah, he has other problems, but from what we're told, he's had them for the longest time.

It's hard to tell how long he's had these problems, really. I still think MJ is the last straw.

His landlord says he's late again with the rent, indicating this seems to happen alot. His boss at the Pizza parlour says he's always late. Dr Conners says Peter's grades have been declining for a long time, and that he always late for class, and always appears exhausted.

But none of these caused even the slightest short circuit in his powers. But when he claps eyes on MJ with a new guy, BAM! The powers go out.

I sound like I'm repeating myself, but I guess I am. Accumulation of problems, but, I do think Raimi continues to focus on MJ because he believes that's what his teenage audience would be able to relate about the most. But the other stuff is there, present to an annoying degree as well, if I may.



Um, my attempt at weirdo humor...

Yes, because he has the time to do all that. But it's MJ whom he again seeks out and tries to get with, even though she's engaged to another man!!!

He is an idiot. And so is she. But if you love someone, and are suddenly feeling great, wouldn't you go after them? (Ignoring the wedding thing :hehe:) It seems natural to me.

Why doesn't he try and make peace with Harry, his best friend who is hurting and sinking into alcoholism, instead of trying to score with an engaged woman? Because it's ALL ABOUT THE GIRL!!!!! :hehe:

He spent more time getting back on track with his job/career/life than chasing MJ, as far as I recall. And then learning the harsh reality of undying responsibilty in the big city.

No, my lad, it certainly is not. Peter's other problems are presented as an after thought. The crux of his emotional turmoil is MJ.

What? No, they were very present. Annoyingly present, actually. Parker was a hopeless loser. You know what I'm talking about. MJ added to the misery in a big way, though.

I would agree, but practically everything in Peter's life involves MJ in some way. She even triggers major events in Peter's life. He goes and does stuff because of her, and this leads him into other events. But at the core, it was MJ that led to it.

I guess I care more about the ramifications rather than the source in this matter.

And I don't like that. One of the best things about Spider-Man 2 was Aunt May. Peter trying to help her get her mortgage sorted in the bank was a welcome oasis because it was an MJ free act, and it involved someone else Peter loves.

If we saw alot more of that, then Raimi would be getting it right.

She's the second main character in the movie. To a certain extent, it makes sense that she has her polished fingernails all over the franchise. One could argue that Peter at class in MJ free. Peter at The Bugle is MJ free. Peter rescuing the super-chinese girl is MJ free stuff. This are decisions he made, regardless of wheter MJ had something to do with it in a very long effects chain at some point. Parker is a sentient being.

I'm sure. Unfortunately MJ is always the one they use.

While I don't need to have MJ in constant distress (SM3 being the main offender of this, where she spent literally the entire movie in distress, in the other ones she could go to her plays withouth getting shot at) I also don't need another scene depicting Aunt May battling Ock or Spider-Flex Aunt May hanging from an angel with her umbrella and not breaking anything.
 
Last edited:
Funny how you advocate the greatness of the likes of Lee/Ditko/Romita but then say it's Raimi's film, and that gives him the right to assasinate characters (MJ/Peter/Gwen/etc.) and storylines (Sandman is Uncle Ben's Killer/All about a girl). Wow.

Guess we will just have to agree to disagree, with reasoning like that.
He never did harm to the characters at all. Sandman being Uncle Ben's killer, as others have said, still is the same thing as if it wasn't him shooting Sandman. Peter let Caradine go, causing Caradine to startle Flint Marko and by accident, shoot Uncle Ben. It's the same lesson.
 
Last edited:
Slag, Stacy:

Knock it off guys, especially the homophobic remarks. Next time it'll be an infraction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"