GamerSlyRatchet
Sidekick
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2006
- Messages
- 4,534
- Reaction score
- 35
- Points
- 58
Blue haired chicks are that? Why?
Sloan thought there's no such thing as too many ****ty cat women?
Blue haired chicks are that? Why?
Didn't you place my "review" as this before?
PossibleSloan thought there's no such thing as too many ****ty cat women?
Sloan thought there's no such thing as too many ****ty cat women?
Porn not good, bad for healthYou meant fortunately.
You meant fortunately.
No, I didn't. I don't need a digital equivalent of a blowup doll. It's lame and insulting.
LOL.
Lame and insulting. Thats cute.
This is a video game based off a comic book, get used to that stuff.
I'm used to it, but it's seriously disappointing. I really don't get the appeal.
I'm used to it, but it's seriously disappointing. I really don't get the appeal.
...While I'm sure you know this, cheap tactics like hawt girls have been used in comics, games and movies for a long time now.
It only really seems to offend most girls. You don't see us guys complaining about how damn near every character looks like they've been on a high-protein diet. Hell, did you see Gordon in Arkham Asylum?![]()
Haha its a half naked chick. Theres the appeal. I mean lets be honest. These games arent being made for someone looking for an intellectual experience.
I mean i guess if they were trying to do a game based off of Gone With the Wind and Scarlet O'Hara had a halter top on with her chest popping out, then yea, id be quite disappointed. But this is Spider-Man, a comic book. So bring on the smut.
It's the game company demonstrating that they believe gamers are immature people who can't get laid. It's partially why I am not anywhere near as excited for Spider-Man: Edge Of Time as I am for Batman: Arkham City. Rocksteady doesn't rely on digital scantly clad women with their digital **** hanging out to sell their game, they have gameplay to attract an audience.
It's the game company demonstrating that they believe gamers are immature people who can't get laid. It's partially why I am not anywhere near as excited for Spider-Man: Edge Of Time as I am for Batman: Arkham City. Rocksteady doesn't rely on digital scantly clad women with their digital **** hanging out to sell their game, they have gameplay to attract an audience.
Yea im FAR more excited for AC than i am EoT. In fact im not excited for EoT at all, but Rocksteady is still using the same tactics that Beenox is. Look at Catwoman, Harley Quinn, Poison Ivy and Talia. They all fit the mold you're so outraged by.
Definitely agreed.
But who cares? EoT will be forgotten about the second Arkham City comes out.t:
Yea im FAR more excited for AC than i am EoT. In fact im not excited for EoT at all, but Rocksteady is still using the same tactics that Beenox is. Look at Catwoman, Harley Quinn, Poison Ivy and Talia. They all fit the mold you're so outraged by.
Exactly. You'd expect a more manly attitude...from men. Complaining that there is too much being shown? That is new, to me.It only really seems to offend most girls. You don't see us guys complaining about how damn near every character looks like they've been on a high-protein diet. Hell, did you see Gordon in Arkham Asylum?![]()
Exactly. You'd expect a more manly attitude...from men. Complaining that there is too much being shown? That is new, to me.
Harley has a thong showing, Ivy's chest is being held back by a button, Talia eh ill give ya that one. All of them are over exaggerated to enhance the sexual appeal. Rocksteady isnt exempt from it.
Harley's thong is barely noticeable, I would have to actually look for it to notice it. For whatever reason Poison Ivy's design never bothered me, nor did it come off as overtly sexual.
Black Cat's costume is open from her neck to right above her crotch, with panties over it. It oozes sleaziness, ****iness, and it makes me feel uncomfortable to look at.
Dude, why are you so offended by this? Seriously? :|