Spider-Man: Edge of Time - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because I find it to be a serious problem. It wreaks of the "gamers are immature losers who can't get laid" philosophy, and one of the big reasons that gaming isn't taken seriously.

Eh, tbh I think you're making a big hoopla out of nothing. Sexualization happens with products aimed at both genders, it's been around for a long time and will remain. I think I can speak for a large amount of people on here when I say it doesn't bother us. As I said before, if the product is as good as they say, why should I care? Why should I be offended?

And I'm not sure what you meant by gaming not being taken seriously, there's a very large amount of good games coming out this year/next year... and I don't think I've heard about that stereotype in a long time. lol
 
Because such thing is non existant.
In God of War, for example, a game that is taken seriously, claimed and of great quality, many women, even some female monsters, don't even wear anything covering their upper body. The breast is there for everyone to see, and I see no one complaining, because it is ridiculous. It doesn't subtract from the experience or the quality of the product.
 
Because such thing is non existant.
In God of War, for example, many women, even some female monsters, don't even anything covering their upper body. The breast is there for everyone to see, and I see no one complaining, because it is ridiculous. It doesn't subtract from the experience or the quality of the product.

Exactly.

It's just a few people that seem to get riled up over nothing.
 
Because such thing is non existant.
In God of War, for example, a game that is taken seriously, claimed and of great quality, many women, even some female monsters, don't even wear anything covering their upper body. The breast is there for everyone to see, and I see no one complaining, because it is ridiculous. It doesn't subtract from the experience or the quality of the product.

God of War is very different from Spider-Man: Edge Of Time. For one, if you want to go the nudity route, that will never happen with the latter.
 
Ummm, Ivy is ****tier than Black Cat's futuristic clone
 
God of War is very different from Spider-Man: Edge Of Time. For one, if you want to go the nudity route, that will never happen with the latter.
That obviously is not the point. The point is showing all the curves of a woman's body without subtracting from the quality of the game, which you think is not taken seriously because of that which, of course, is not the case.

GOW is taken seriously besides of what is shown from the woman's body because it is a quality game. EoT won't be taken less seriously because of that, but because of story or gameplay aspects.
 
Again, it doesn't come across that way to me.

Thats because its a better character design overall.

I mean say what you will about showing to much skin or whatever, but that Black Cat design is ugly.
 
Thats because its a better character design overall.

I mean say what you will about showing to much skin or whatever, but that Black Cat design is ugly.
Black Cat design is uglier, Ivy's design is ugly
 
OK so now I have this theory:

Those guys who complain about the "sex appeal" of Black Cat etc. because they feel that it fuels the "gamers are immature losers who can't get laid" fire....

...those are actually immature losers who can't get laid.

The same kind of people who obey to everything a woman says like a slave, because they think that it will ultimately make them win the girl's heart. And then they blame everything but themselves when eventually, the girl falls in love with someone else.

The same kind of people that claims (when girls can hear them) that society today uses women only as sexual objects and treats them unfair. Because those guys think that saying that will make them popular among girls. What they don't realise though is that kissing girls' bottoms won't take them anywhere. And so they blame everything but themselves when those girls fall in love with the more exciting, self-secure, independent and not-so-dorky guys.

But the moment they're alone in their basement with nothing to do, they still can't resist to watch their beloved "Girl takes it in the ass" video at their computer.


What some of those wannabe-feminist dorks don't seem to realise is that men are with no doubt as "sexually objectified" as women these days. Men in media are often portrayed to have the abs of an Olympian athlete, arms of a Greek god and a face taken straight from a Twilight or James Bond film.

Are women complaining about that? Hell no! They love to see those perfect shaped men in underwear so they see no reason to complain. However, they complain alot about how women are portrayed in media. Oh, the irony.

And here, MEN (or boys) seem to have no problem with how men are portrayed, but complain about the OPPOSITE sex showing some skin as if it's the worst sin imaginable. It's hilariously ridiculous if you ask me.
 
OK so now I have this theory:

Those guys who complain about the "sex appeal" of Black Cat etc. because they feel that it fuels the "gamers are immature losers who can't get laid" fire....

...those are actually immature losers who can't get laid.

The same kind of people who obey to everything a woman says like a slave, because they think that it will ultimately make them win the girl's heart. And then they blame everything but themselves when eventually, the girl falls in love with someone else.

The same kind of people that claims (when girls can hear them) that society today uses women only as sexual objects and treats them unfair. Because those guys think that saying that will make them popular among girls. What they don't realise though is that kissing girls' bottoms won't take them anywhere. And so they blame everything but themselves when those girls fall in love with the more exciting, self-secure, independent and not-so-dorky guys.

But the moment they're alone in their basement with nothing to do, they still can't resist to watch their beloved "Girl takes it in the ass" video at their computer.


What some of those wannabe-feminist dorks don't seem to realise is that men are with no doubt as "sexually objectified" as women these days. Men in media are often portrayed to have the abs of an Olympian athlete, arms of a Greek god and a face taken straight from a Twilight or James Bond film.

Are women complaining about that? Hell no! They love to see those perfect shaped men in underwear so they see no reason to complain. However, they complain alot about how women are portrayed in media. Oh, the irony.

And here, MEN (or boys) seem to have no problem with how men are portrayed, but complain about the OPPOSITE sex showing some skin as if it's the worst sin imaginable. It's hilariously ridiculous if you ask me.

QFT. :up:
 
I can't stand seeing my beloved girl take it in her mouth or other place, it's worse in the arse
 
Let me highlight the problems i have with your post

Oscorp said:
OK so now I have this theory:

Those guys who complain about the "sex appeal" of Black Cat etc. because they feel that it fuels the "gamers are immature losers who can't get laid" fire....

...those are actually immature losers who can't get laid.


The same kind of people who obey to everything a woman says like a slave, because they think that it will ultimately make them win the girl's heart. And then they blame everything but themselves when eventually, the girl falls in love with someone else.

The same kind of people that claims (when girls can hear them) that society today uses women only as sexual objects and treats them unfair. Because those guys think that saying that will make them popular among girls. What they don't realise though is that kissing girls' bottoms won't take them anywhere. And so they blame everything but themselves when those girls fall in love with the more exciting, self-secure, independent and not-so-dorky guys.

But the moment they're alone in their basement with nothing to do, they still can't resist to watch their beloved "Girl takes it in the ass" video at their computer.


What some of those wannabe-feminist dorks don't seem to realise is that men are with no doubt as "sexually objectified" as women these days. Men in media are often portrayed to have the abs of an Olympian athlete, arms of a Greek god and a face taken straight from a Twilight or James Bond film.

Are women complaining about that? Hell no! They love to see those perfect shaped men in underwear so they see no reason to complain. However, they complain alot about how women are portrayed in media. Oh, the irony.

And here, MEN (or boys) seem to have no problem with how men are portrayed, but complain about the OPPOSITE sex showing some skin as if it's the worst sin imaginable. It's hilariously ridiculous if you ask me.

Firstly, you've basically dismissed every case of women's rights as entirely sexually motivated, thus completely undermining the whole rights issue. Completely assuming that any guy who believes in rights is doing it to get into a girls pants is just basic stupidity and ignorance, and also shows a complete lack of understanding of equality in general.

Then, the assumption that all women LOVE to see topless men and what have you, thus making it okay. Let me ask you, how many Men are portrayed in the same, negative light as women in the media? It's not about who shows skin, it's about the way they're portrayed.

For men, you have people like Thor, or Captain America. Sure they're topless and could be a 'sex object' but they're also a dominant, heroic, high status character. How many sexualised females do we get with the same status?

For the record, I have no problem with Black Cat nor Catwoman, because they are characters who DELIBERATELY use sex as a way to control men and have been written that way for a while, but honestly, when you think about it, when it comes to giving a woman higher status as a character, that's pretty much what they ALWAYS do, make them sexually free and liberated and equate that to a 'strong female character'.

But seriously dude, you've completely taken any truth as to what feminism is all about there and just made it about sex. In one post, you've confirmed why more men NEED to have a feminist attitude. You may as well have said "Feminism? That's GAY!"

Also,

Spider-Aziz said:
I can't stand seeing my beloved girl take it in her mouth or other place, it's worse in the arse

Way too much information. What you look up on YouTube in the privacy of your own home is between you and your internet provider.
 
sex sells...bottom line. And an overwhelming majority of gamers/comic book fans are guys. Hell, when I have a choice in a game, I'll often create a hot chick character to play as because I'd rather check out a hot babe while playing through a long game than some burly dude. That and I'll usually try to make said babe look like my wife, which she enjoys.

Black cat has almost always dressed with the zipper a bit too far down...and I personally love that because she looks freaking hot...and it's a part of her character. Not to mention Black cat is often making sexual remarks and what not. So it makes sense for her character to look like that.

If they made MJ walk around in this game in nothing but underwear, that would be one thing...but it's freaking black cat...and boobs are awesome.

so quit your *****in.
 
^ And they are not over sensualizing MJ, so they're not aiming at that.
They probably zipped Black Cat a little less to differentiate her more from her 616 character, besides some other details in the hands and the feet.

That's pretty much it.
If they were aiming at overexposing the women's body, MJ would be on the same patamar too, but she is not known for using her sensuality as a weapon, so she is fully covered. Black Cat has always been like that, they're just showing her belly to differentiate from her original.
 
Way too much information. What you look up on YouTube in the privacy of your own home is between you and your internet provider.
I don't watch what I don't like, and I loathe the 'P' genre

Everyone is taking this nonsense way too seriously.
Silence of the rabbits
If they made MJ walk around in this game in nothing but underwear, that would be one thing...but it's freaking black cat...and boobs are awesome.
It reminds me of Cult of Love when MJ stripped for a picture
 
sex sells...bottom line. And an overwhelming majority of gamers/comic book fans are guys. Hell, when I have a choice in a game, I'll often create a hot chick character to play as because I'd rather check out a hot babe while playing through a long game than some burly dude. That and I'll usually try to make said babe look like my wife, which she enjoys.

Black cat has almost always dressed with the zipper a bit too far down...and I personally love that because she looks freaking hot...and it's a part of her character. Not to mention Black cat is often making sexual remarks and what not. So it makes sense for her character to look like that.

If they made MJ walk around in this game in nothing but underwear, that would be one thing...but it's freaking black cat...and boobs are awesome.

so quit your *****in.

ehh.. to be fair that's not true. she's only had that costume in the late 80's, early 90s
 
the operative word is "almost" there, folks. late 80's early 90's is still about 20 years...and she first debuted in 1979. I rest my case.
 
Enough derailing
I like the voice actress, but I think they should have got the one from Spider-Man 2 back if they couldn't get Tricia Helfer, that one sounds better than this one as BC imo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,289
Messages
22,080,726
Members
45,880
Latest member
Heartbeat
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"