Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]396767[/split]
He was underwritten but he wasn't the point of the movie. He was a prop for Kirk and Spock's relationship
Which still amounts to some somewhat mediocre writing.
I think JJ's directing really made Star Trek work despite a slightly wonky script. The visuals, casting and sheer fun elevated the material.
100%.I think JJ's directing really made Star Trek work despite a slightly wonky script. The visuals, casting and sheer fun elevated the material.
That's what I said in 2009. Despite having a ****** script and lame ash villian the movie still worked for those reasons. I really do hope that J.J and crew wrote a better script this time though because they may not be so lucky a second time.I think JJ's directing really made Star Trek work despite a slightly wonky script. The visuals, casting and sheer fun elevated the material.
I hope this film can feature some more of the interplay between Kirk, Spock and McCoy, with Spock and McCoy offering opposing viewpoints while Kirk has to make a decision.
STAR TREK 2 IMAX footage looked as great as I hoped it would be. Almost non-stop action. Wish the movie was coming out sooner than May.
Cumberbatch is in the footage but only briefly. Most of the footage features the crew having to deal with something dangerous.
Also STAR TREK 2 IMAX footage (the first 8 minutes) has a RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK feel to it. You'll understand why after you see it.
How cool would it be if Cumberbatch was a former Red Shirt?