DoomsdayApex
Avenger
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 16,391
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
A worldwide gross of three times production budget is good for almost any film. It sets a film up for a good profit against total costs after home entertainment revenue. A lot of films, even successful ones, don't get into the black from theatrical box office alone when measured against total costs. Production and marketing costs are too high for that. While some giant hits achieve significant theatrical profitability, it's not what the business model is built on these days. Home entertainment isn't an afterthought. It's an integral part of the total revenue versus total costs package.
Well if you are going to include other expenses than you should also include other revenues.
You make triple your production budget and there is no reason your movie shouldn't make money
If that's the case with these numbers, then somebody better call Del Toro and tell him that Hellboy 3 financing is imminent. Same thing with the Robocop sequel.
Immortals was NOT a success no matter how you slice it. The studios that help produce it barely broke even. Marketing costs count with the budget even if it doesn't show up officially. Add to the fact that out of those 226 million WW, about 40 million (Universal and Relatively didn't even see that full amount in return) was international revenue.
In what dimension is that 'good'?