I get it.
While people were going crazy over Ledger's performance it took me a while to accept it because of his look.
I just wanted classical Joker. Not the hobo, smeared lipstick look. However, once I got past that I got to enjoy the amazing Joker performance.
What happened with Heath's Joker is why I'm more accepting of Leto. Not saying he'll be as good. Just more accepting of different looks.
I've been pondering a lot about this.... I realized that I have more problems with making Leto's Joker a modern gangster than the design itself. Or to put it this way, I've grown fond of the design on its own, what I don't like about it is that it contextualizes Joker as a leader of a criminal organization in such a direct way, drawing an inspiration from Mexican cartels.
If there was a case of modern twist to his usual flamboyance, I wouldn't mind it, but I don't like them limiting the character this way. Once you put the character on the head of such organization, show him having completely sane criminals in tuxedos working for him and him caring for the money and power obtained through this, you take away a lot from the character that works best as a psychopathic personalization of chaos, an archetype of a whimsical trickster that is there to push the buttons of society we know and rules we adhere to. This is why I'm not really fond of Azzarello's Joker (who incidentally shares the aesthetic of Ledger's version), as such contextualization takes away all those unique elements that are rooted in the character and instead of aforementioned archetype, makes him something with desires and goals that are much easier to understand.
Also, when Ayer says that Joker has always been a gangster, he is wrong. He started off as a serial killer and is more often portrayed as an unpredictable psychopath, one that takes pleasure in taking anything from the established system and twisting it in a hideous and sometimes grimly humorous way than a ganster capable of leading such organization. I think the character works much better when he doesn't care for money in a least, being a Marxist to Batman's capitalist as it was often pointed out in the past. I suppose that he is power-hungry in his own way, but again, making him someone who aims to climb higher in the world of an organized crime is limiting those more unique and interesting aspects of the character.
Anyway, my two cents, as they say.
With all that being said, this:
is a great cover. He looks a bit whiter here than usual though, I really like the Albino approach they took with him, which is something I suggested before we got to see the look (and which, again, makes it really a shame that they took a gangster approach, as some sort of "Jack the Ripper" aesthetic with old tuxedos would make him even creepier to me), but other than that, the concept behind cover is interesting and Joker looks crazy as hell here.
I knew it's not an EW cover as soon as I glimpsed it.
