Suicide Squad: General Discussion and Speculation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Part 35

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm betting the other Harley/Joker scenes used to be flashbacks as well, until they were chopped up and inserted in the Waller exposition scene.

He looks crazy as **** here

tumblr_ogn5o6j3mN1tud93eo1_500.jpg
 
Last edited:
I'm betting the other Harley/Joker scenes used to be flashbacks as well, until they were chopped up and inserted in the Waller exposition scene.

He looks crazy as **** here

tumblr_ogn5o6j3mN1tud93eo1_500.jpg

Pretty much every character's backstory was. Amanda Waller's exposition scene came in very late in the game.
 
Pretty much every character's backstory was. Amanda Waller's exposition scene came in very late in the game.

Yeah. We'll see whether the marketing fooled us again or they really re-inserted the old dinner scene.
 
Yeah. We'll see whether the marketing fooled us again or they really re-inserted the old dinner scene.

Honestly, the marketing for this never fooled anyone into thinking that this is another version of the movie. It's always been marketed as an extended cut with new footage.

If it's more than that I'll be happily surprised.
 
Honestly, the marketing for this never fooled anyone into thinking that this is another version of the movie. It's always been marketed as an extended cut with new footage.

If it's more than that I'll be happily surprised.

Well, they did show the old Waller scene in the trailer for the new cut. There's no excuse for that, because they know exactly what is and isn't in the movie.
 
If I'm not mistaken they also used it for the TV spots of the movie, near its release. And I really don't think they included that (if it's not in the extended cut) to trick people into thinking this is a different cut of Suicide Squad. The only people noticing that's a different version of the scenes are people like you and me who tend to over-analyze this stuff and discuss it on message boards.

And don't think the PR people think about the implications of showing an alternate take in the trailer for the extended version. They've got, next to the movie, all sorts of trailer-ready footage which they use.

The studio has announced this as being an extended version which is 11 minutes longer and has 13 minutes of new footage. Expecting anything else is setting yourself up for disappointment.
 
If I'm not mistaken they also used it for the TV spots of the movie, near its release. And I really don't think they included that (if it's not in the extended cut) to trick people into thinking this is a different cut of Suicide Squad. The only people noticing that's a different version of the scenes are people like you and me who tend to over-analyze this stuff and discuss it on message boards.

And don't think the PR people think about the implications of showing an alternate take in the trailer for the extended version. They've got, next to the movie, all sorts of trailer-ready footage which they use.

The studio has announced this as being an extended version which is 11 minutes longer and has 13 minutes of new footage. Expecting anything else is setting yourself up for disappointment.

I'm not saying they're purposefully tricking us into thinking it's an alternate cut (which it technically is but whatever). I'm saying that the trailer footage combined with the implications of the footage we've already seen seem to indicate that the scene could have been replaced. We know we're getting a longer Arkham sequence which kind of messes with the alternate dinner scene. Unless it's just one or two extra lines, of course.
 
Man, you know what wouldve been a neat idea? If instead of this extended cut they just edited together like a 20 min prequel short film called "Mad Love" that constitutes of most of the unused Joker/Harley footage and it could be a sort of companion piece to the film on the blu ray. That wouldve been cool, and they dont have to try to cram in all this supposed backstory they filmed into flashbacks.
 
Man, you know what wouldve been a neat idea? If instead of this extended cut they just edited together like a 20 min prequel short film called "Mad Love" that constitutes of most of the unused Joker/Harley footage and it could be a sort of companion piece to the film on the blu ray. That wouldve been cool, and they dont have to try to cram in all this supposed backstory they filmed into flashbacks.

Maybe all these flashbacks edited back makes it far worse flow wise and thats why they were cut :huh:
 
Lesser of two evils. I'll take worse flow over non-existent scenes that were marketed and the butchering of those that are there.

The only solution to this would have been a better script.
 
Maybe all these flashbacks edited back makes it far worse flow wise and thats why they were cut :huh:

To be completely honest. I think this is EXACTLY why they were cut. The movie is ultimately about the Squad and 30 mins of Harley/ Joker backstory wouldve definitely hurt the flow of the film no matter how good the footage is.

But Greens is right, ultimately it all boils down to the script. It sounds like the original script stopped the main story to tell lots of backstory for these characters.
 
Man, the more I see of Leto's joker, the more I dislike him. The look, the performance, the weird grunting noises he makes, and the laugh (which is hit and miss for me).

Just feels like he is trying too hard. His insanity doesn't feel natural. It's like he's trying to be crazy even though he isn't.

Lol you guys get what I'm saying?
 
Man, the more I see of Leto's joker, the more I dislike him. The look, the performance, the weird grunting noises he makes, and the laugh (which is hit and miss for me).

Just feels like he is trying too hard. His insanity doesn't feel natural. It's like he's trying to be crazy even though he isn't.

Lol you guys get what I'm saying?

I do. Agreed with all of it.
 
Not really. I liked/loved Leto's joker and my only problem was that he was not there enough and the more I see of him the more I like him.
 
Yeah he is like a Joker impersonator for the most part. And that purring...Yuck.
 
The scenes weren't cut for pacing. They were cut because Warner Bros. got cold feet after the Batman V Superman backlash, and decided to nix most of the darker and heavier contents, in favor of a much lighter tone, more in line with Marvel Studios' output.
They turned a movie upside down during its post-production, and barely got a movie out of it. For better or worse, they should've just stuck to David Ayer's script and original vision. But hey, I'm probably starting to sound like a broken record.
 
Yeah he is like a Joker impersonator for the most part. And that purring...Yuck.

I don't know if there's any Batman Beyond fans here, but Leto's joker kind of reminds me of the jokerz gang from that show. It's like a fan who dressed himself up as the joker but isn't actually the real joker.
 
Felt like the Joker to me. Unfortunately most of his work got the shaft in the final cut.
 
Actual dialogue of that clip:

Joker: Uuuugh....

Harley: UGH!

Joker: Uuouuugh...

Harley: Unhg...

Joker: Guhhh... uhh... You...

Harley: You're not leaving me. You're not leaving me.


I wouldn't be surprised if they cut out some scenes for a good reason.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"