KangConquers
Purple Kang, Purple Kang
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2004
- Messages
- 7,153
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 33
Green Lantern's start landed behind X-Men: First Class's $55.1 million and Thor's $65.7 million, and its Friday-to-Saturday drop of 22 percent was steeper than those movies' eight percent. The gross was also less than The Incredible Hulk and the two Fantastic Four movies, and the attendance disparity was only greater. Green Lantern's estimated attendance was even lower than Daredevil and Ghost Rider.
I feel like Cap is going to do much better than GL, both financially and (hopefully) critically.Wel, Chas you were right. Out of the four comic book movies being released, at least one of them had to be a rotton apple of the bunch. And GL was one of them. Hopefully Cap remedies these feelings.
Incorrect. All the profits from the box office do not go to the studio. It needs to make about 800 million to break even. That is the general rule of thumb. A film must make double it's cost to be seen as profitable in theaters.It's about 350 million including marketing. But then you have to figure in giving the cinemas a cut, international distribution etc.
It probably needs to make at least 400 million WW just to break even.
Incorrect. All the profits from the box office do not go to the studio. It needs to make about 800 million to break even. That is the general rule of thumb. A film must make double it's cost to be seen as profitable in theaters.
It had its trailer attached to TDK. What more marketing do you need?DC's last superhero film (Watchmen), and that had much less of a marketing push
One trailer alone doesn't sell a movie to everyone, even if it was attached to the highest grossing superhero film of all time. Watchmen didn't have cross promotions with Subway, Frito Lay and Reese's Peanut Butter cups like GL.It had its trailer attached to TDK. What more marketing do you need?
One trailer alone doesn't sell a movie to everyone, even if it was attached to the highest grossing superhero film of all time.
One trailer alone doesn't sell a movie to everyone, even if it was attached to the highest grossing superhero film of all time. Watchmen didn't have cross promotions with Subway, Frito Lay and Reese's Peanut Butter cups like GL.
This all depends on cap having the quality and word of mouth you predict it's going to have. Outside of a well cut trailer I'm curious where this is coming from?
Wow, Super 8 has legs, fantastic!
I feel like Cap is going to do much better than GL, both financially and (hopefully) critically.
The decade? Green Lantern isn't even the worst reviewed film of this year.If only every film could face one of the worst reviewed films of the decade in it's second weekend.
True. I think it'll be the opposite of Thor and pull in much more money domestically than internationally.Yeah but whatever Cap does make up for domestically it will probably lose internationally.
The decade? Green Lantern isn't even the worst reviewed film of this year.
Good for Super 8! I'm a little surprised GL landed even lower than my $55-60m prediction with both the 3D and their insane marketing push. I was visiting NYC this weekend, and that movie was completely inescapable there.
I think y'all are underestimating Cap's overseas potential. It's set in WWII. Considering Hollywood WWII flicks usually do gangbusters overseas, I think that (and the Avengers hype) may counterbalance the ''America'' problem internationally fairly well.