Spider - Man
Sidekick
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 1,472
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
James"007"Bond said:Let me dazzle you with this, you're a pr1ck.
That's what your mom likes about me!

James"007"Bond said:Howard being cast is better casting than other actors chosen for other marvel characters. His look is suitable for Rhodey but that was something I thought I didn't have to mention because, I thought I didn't have to point out the bleeding obvious but, I guess some idiots are slow like that.
Howard's look is inconsequencial right now because, his look is suitable and spitting images aren't a prerequisite. The main focus is his talent and his creds and performances are all the proof one needs to determine wether or not he's qualified for the role.
It wouldn't do to make a habbit out of being an asspr1ck. Schooled.
Ok, who really cares if he is better for Rhodey than, say, Joseph Culp was for Dr. Doom? That's supposed to make us 'idiots' feel better? Again, you make a sweeping statement without any examples to back it up. I asked a simple question: what makes him "more than qualified"? As I knew would be the case, you sidestepped answering the question,taking the low road and calling me an idiot again, a tactic reserved for those lacking the intellect to clearly express their point, and again gave a broad, generalized reason for your 'opinion'. You say "his performance and his creds" without actually citing any, sounding as if you really have no clue what you're talking about. "His look is suitable" says to me you are happy with the choice because "he is a black man." What OTHER trait does he have that makes him "more than qualified" for the role of Jim Rhodes? Come on, boy, I'm trying to help you form a rational argument. I know I'm wasting my time with that though, because your response will once again be regurgitated, generalized crap. The truth is, he does NOT have any of the characteristics of Jim Rhodes other than being a black man.
As I also stated, and to which you failed to respond, your argument could also be perfect reason to put Ian McKellan in the role of James Bond: talent, performance, and creds. A suave, handsome English actor. If that were the case, though, you'd turn against your own argument like Benedict Arnold and cry foul like the puss that you truly are.
As for you schooling anyone, I'd first suggest learning to spell 'whether' and 'habit', and what is THIS - His look is suitable for Rhodey but that was something I thought I didn't have to mention because, I thought I didn't have to point out the bleeding obvious but, I guess some idiots are slow like that - a run on-and-on sentence? Truth is you couldn't find your ass with both hands and a roadmap, much less make an educated judgement on an actor's qualifications. And as for the name-calling, I can see where it could become all too comfortable saying things like that via a chatboard but be careful: one day you may slip and actually say that to somebody's face and then you'll see what an 'asspr1ck' really is!
