Oh it's cute, you actually think you have me. Just sooo adorable.
Err no, not really. Why so serious.
Oh it's cute, you actually think you have me. Just sooo adorable.
I think most studios wouldn't care about the reviews if it made decent money. See Transformers, Pirates.
However, this should have probably followed the Nolan formula and not taken a dip from it's predecessor especially for a movie costing more.
It's not a very good sign for a franchise which was the standard for CBMs to possibly come in 4th behind Cap, X-Men and possibly GotG.
I've been following it against TWS. It got a bit of a bump with the holiday yesterday but they are $40 million behind TWS now $39. Since the comparable days are becoming less and less, it's looking at about $205 domestic.Actuals are in (7,823/10,010). Since its third week end it keeps on dropping like Spider-Man 3 on the we + 3% or so. This should mean another 50%+ drop for next week end (or right around 50%).
I've been following it against TWS. It got a bit of a bump with the holiday yesterday but they are $40 million behind TWS now $39. Since the comparable days are becoming less and less, it's looking at about $205 domestic.
Wow, don't things to seriously bud.
They have made enough to make another, mission accomplished. Well if you have liked the first two so far anyway.![]()
Yeah, TASM really didn't do that badly for a reboot after such a short amount of time with strong competition. This film should have kicked on to at least $900m.Man who could image that the movie could make 57 less then asm1 in usa when asm1 had the reboot and the orgin and had more compation then this movie. I know that we had Godzilla and xmen this year but that is no avengers dark knight hype like asm1 went up agest.
Um, no, they haven't made "enough" money to make another one. Anyone who knows anything about business knows that spending $500 million on a movie in all & getting less than $700 million worldwide isn't profitable.
I must be in the Twilight Zone...
Yeah, TASM really didn't do that badly for a reboot after such a short amount of time with strong competition. This film should have kicked on to at least $900m.
ASM 3 is in a good spot because I think all the huge movies come out in April/May 2016. This is slated for June 16th which is a pretty good spot imo.
I think you are taking what I said wrong. I didn't mean making enough the money from this film to directly fund the next. But it making enough to justify giving another one a go.
ASM 3 is in a good spot because I think all the huge movies come out in April/May 2016. This is slated for June 16th which is a pretty good spot imo.
And you'd still be wrong because the numbers don't support either of those notions.
So its your belief a third film will not be made?
2016 is just loaded I don't know if there is a good time in 2016 in less they do like October or something because even in December 2016 you have avatar 2. 2016 you could have like 8 movies make a billion or more no joke.
6/24/16 is completely empty. Its the weekend right before the July 4th one. Its a good spot if somebody wants to move out of the crowded May. Even ASM3 could move up and take this spot, does Sony really think Angry Birds is gonna be that big of a hit.
The weekend before Memorial is also vacant. These spots will definitely fill eventually.
Yeah, I think it has a horrible release date.You seriously think that coming after Captain America 3, Batman v Superman and X-Men Apocalypse and just before 2 animated juggernauts is a good spot ?
I mean, if TASM faced competition in the form of Avengers and TDKR in 2012 I don't know what to think about the 2016 competition.
I'm not saying it won't be made, just that the numbers for TASM 2 are abysmal. Sony doesn't have smart people at the helm of projects, so we'll definitely get a part three that will probably be just as over-budgeted as the second film.
Nah, only two at maximum will make a billion, those being Superman/Batman & Captain America 3. There's no way eight films are going to make a billion dollars in the SAME year. You make it seem as if its some easy feat.
In normal circumstances, I think Sony would shelve the third installment. But things are complicated by the fact they don't own this IP. They have to make it, whether the numbers justify it or not. Otherwise they will permanently lose the rights to the character if they can't get a film out in a number of years (said to be five).
If this was WB and this was the Batman franchise performing like this, things would be different.