The Amazing Spider-Man 2 The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - User Review Thread! - SPOILERS! - Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
popcorn_big_48.gif
 
Yeah, just ignore 3/4 of the forum. Only read the comments you agree with. That's what discussion threads are for. To only discuss why you loved the movie.

Why do you always insist on using sarcasm?
 
Something a little more than an out of seemingly nowhere 2 minute scene? Lol just boil it down to:

Peter: We were friends once.
Harry: Yeah.
Peter: Do you wanna be friends again?
Harry: ...I guess.

That's what you wanted to see?
 
What is it that you need to see? Holding hands? Going to Starbucks together?
Because that is the only way to convey significant friendship...

First thing I would have done has been for the two to actually know each other in their most difficult and important years. Not pre-teen friends, who have no idea the kind of person one another would be at this point. I think about how the Harry and Gwen moments would have felt, if this wasn't completely unrelated parts of Peter's life meeting, as opposed to the actually implosion of his personal life.

There is a huge difference between Peter rejecting a ghost from his childhood, and his actual, current, real friend. If the wanted to still go this route, they needed them bonding, spending real time together. Becoming friends again. Not a couple of scenes, and then "bam!", Peter betrayed his best friend. No wonder he is angry.
 
No you got it. I was trying to keep it going, and failed horribly. :csad:

As I said, I thought their reunion scene was quite cute. The uni-brow line being the biggest winner.

Oh, s**t, haha. Okay, glad I understood your reference, after all.

And yeah, the unibrow joke was freakin' priceless. Mainly beacause it was kinda true. :lmao:
 
That has to do with post production coloring choices though. Digital is much less tedious and much more malleable than film.

I know it's partially because of color correction and grading, yes.

Still, having handled both film and digital, myself, I've always found film to have much more pop.
 
Oh, s**t, haha. Okay, glad I understood your reference, after all.

And yeah, the unibrow joke was freakin' priceless. Mainly beacause it was kinda true. :lmao:
I have never looked at Garfield's eyebrows, or should I say eyebrow, before. Then I spent a solid 30 seconds trying to decide if he truly had one or not. :funny:
 
Because some people take this waay too seriously and personally.

You're on a forum about a comic book character that people are extremely passionate about. Of course people are going to take this seriously and personally.
 
I know it's partially because of color correction and grading, yes.

Still, having handled both film and digital, myself, I've always found film to have much more pop.

True, but editing is so much more tedious, especially quick cuts and such which are pretty rampant in modern films. Same sort of arguments with music and such. Pro tools, no pro tools etc.
 
Last edited:
You're on a forum about a comic book character that people are extremely passionate about. Of course people are going to take this seriously and personally.

Doesn't stop it from being a little funny at times. I see those very same people being sarcastic all the time.
 
You're on a forum about a comic book character that people are extremely passionate about. Of course people are going to take this seriously and personally.
Why do we act like we must all be irrational because we are fans of comic book characters? As if this is a free pass or something.
 
I have never looked at Garfield's eyebrows, or should I say eyebrow, before. Then I spent a solid 30 seconds trying to decide if he truly had one or not. :funny:

Haha, really?

'Cause I've been looking at his eyebrows for like 2 years now.

They're really thick, and definitely kinda unibrow-y. Apparenty, Andrew looked himself up online, once, and saw that someone had said he looked like a neanderthal, and he was very offended. So I hope Andrew don't see my posts.

Because I still think he's fabulous, even with the unibrow.

garfield1a912.jpg


Buuuut, it's definitely there, though.
 
True, but editing is so much more tedious, especially quick cuts and such which are pretty rampant in modern films. Same sort of arguments with music and such. Pro tools, no pro tools etc.

Yeah, man.

But film all the way. :up:
 
Because that is the only way to convey significant friendship...

First thing I would have done has been for the two to actually know each other in their most difficult and important years. Not pre-teen friends, who have no idea the kind of person one another would be at this point. I think about how the Harry and Gwen moments would have felt, if this wasn't completely unrelated parts of Peter's life meeting, as opposed to the actually implosion of his personal life.

There is a huge difference between Peter rejecting a ghost from his childhood, and his actual, current, real friend. If the wanted to still go this route, they needed them bonding, spending real time together. Becoming friends again. Not a couple of scenes, and then "bam!", Peter betrayed his best friend. No wonder he is angry.

Them knowing each other longer would've had no change on how we interpret their friendship. The only thing that changes is you just plant in your that they're best friends. It's not as if we're going to see that friendship they've had in the past.
 
Them knowing each other longer would've had no change on how we interpret their friendship. The only thing that changes is you just plant in your that they're best friends. It's not as if we're going to see that friendship they've had in the past.
That is like saying the end of Gone with the Wind wouldn't be changed if the entire film that preceded it hadn't occurred. As if the film, the scenes, the characters and they story they convey isn't essential to bringing out those emotions. As if it is enough to simply say, "they were best friends".

It is that kind of filmmaking that gave the world TASM 2.
 
That is like saying the end of Gone with the Wind wouldn't be changed if the entire film that preceded it hadn't occurred. As if the film, the scenes, the characters and they story they convey isn't essential to bringing out those emotions. As if it is enough to simply say, "they were best friends".

It is that kind of filmmaking that gave the world TASM 2.

:lmao:

Funnily enough, that's what I always thought of B&R.
 
You're on a forum about a comic book character that people are extremely passionate about. Of course people are going to take this seriously and personally.

There's a difference between taking something seriously and taking ownership in it. Been seeing quite a bit of the latter lately.
 
That is like saying the end of Gone with the Wind wouldn't be changed if the entire film that preceded it hadn't occurred. As if the film, the scenes, the characters and they story they convey isn't essential to bringing out those emotions. As if it is enough to simply say, "they were best friends".

It is that kind of filmmaking that gave the world TASM 2.

Never seen the film, so I have nothing to add to that.
 
I liked the film for the most part, definitely liked it more than the first Amazing Spidey.

And hot damn, Spider-Man kept his mask on!! :eek: :eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"