GammaAzazel
Civilian
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2010
- Messages
- 223
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
Well dan slott did say MJ was going to die so there's that.
Where the hell was this said? I missed it. Lmao
Well dan slott did say MJ was going to die so there's that.

He never said it - don't listen to him.![]()
Well dan slott did say MJ was going to die so there's that.
It was flat out lies like that that caused Slott to come in here and attack people in the first place. Stop being a troll.
Venom's only good appearances were the first 2 in ASM #299/300 & ASM #316/317.... after that, the character became a one-trick pony and got boring really fast.
I agree. Flash Thompson being the new Venom is probably of the most exciting, clever, and interesting developments to happen to both characters in long time.I love what's going on with Flash & the symbiote, so I hope we get to see more of this for a few years...
![]()
I agree. Flash Thompson being the new Venom is probably of the most exciting, clever, and interesting developments to happen to both characters in long time.
You know I felt should have been Venom from the very beginning? Lance Bannon. After all, here was a character who was already depicted as being Peter Parker's polar opposite and was a rival photographer and neither of them liked each other much already. Eddie Brock, even though Peter supposedly knew him, was character the readers never heard of prior to this and who--unlike the symbiote--had a weak motivation for hating Spider-Man (seriously, he's angry at Spidey caught the real Sin-Eater and, unknowingly, embarrassed him because he got the story wrong about who the Sin-Eater was).

Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice.Well dan slott did say MJ was going to die so there's that.


Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice.
What?! When?! Where?! Huh?!
Geez.
That goes right up there with stillanerd's predictions always being right.
And spideyboy_1111 not being a hater of the book and looking for things to be wrong.
At some point someone's going to have to tell me when internet reality even comes CLOSE to actual reality.
![]()
Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice.
What?! When?! Where?! Huh?!
Geez.
That goes right up there with stillanerd's predictions always being right.
And spideyboy_1111 not being a hater of the book and looking for things to be wrong.
At some point someone's going to have to tell me when internet reality even comes CLOSE to actual reality.
![]()
That was sarcasm and a joke.
Three straight pages about how that was just a rumor that you actively said in a very negative way wasn't true and you'd think you might get that.
I worry about your ability to use humor for peter parker if you're that unable to tell a joke and not be a consistent ass to everyone that says something you don't like. At least try and be a likable ass or an amusing one.
I think you ALL need to take it down a notch and stop giving this place a negative vibe. This is the internet folks, it has no bearing on your life once you step outside your front door. Keep it as what it is, a fun escape from real life problems and act accordingly.
I think you are all overreacting, including you spidey-boy. There's an icon in the lower left of all the posts to report that post. If you want to go to a mod....then go. My advice, don't make another post and throw gas on a fire for all to see. Let the mods do their job, it's easier when it's not a spectacle.
And md claims it was sarcasm the next day. We have a sarcasm smiley for that....just sayin.
the hype soooooooooooo needs a "like" buttonHey I don't come on here every day. Three pages of explaining to dan slott how it's ok for any theory (even a wrong one as he stated and I mentioned at least five times in the last four pages) and this isn't clear? I will happily repost our conversation in which that was all clearly defined and explained but I'll sum it up for you:
Dan Slott: I'm so mad that people are posting theories about my fiction that aren't correct. MJ isn't dying.
Me: Well they are just theories, you shouldn't mind people guessing at your work even if it's wrong.
(Repeat this cycle about five times)
ShockDingo: So is anything new happening with this arc?
Me: Well MJ is going to die.
Dan Slott: See! This is the nonsense I'm talking about! Rage! You're all so stupid because you can't correctly guess my works of fiction and shouldn't post any theories unless you're always right all the time! More Rage!
^basically. Now I know I didn't use smileys, and the reason for this is simple: I never use smileys. This is because I both hate them and also am not a twelve year old girl. Obvious sarcasm (and this was obvious if you looked at ANY of the posts) don't need little faces making little faces for you to figure something out about the statement. You're either smart enough to understand or you're a rube (yeah I used rube, I'm bringing the word back) and therefore part of the joke. Is there a sarcasm smiley for that? Just saying.
it seems to fit the bill best, though more often than not, I think of it as a cunnilingus smilie...
Hey I don't come on here every day. Three pages of explaining to dan slott how it's ok for any theory (even a wrong one as he stated and I mentioned at least five times in the last four pages) and this isn't clear? I will happily repost our conversation in which that was all clearly defined and explained but I'll sum it up for you:
Dan Slott: I'm so mad that people are posting theories about my fiction that aren't correct. MJ isn't dying.
Me: Well they are just theories, you shouldn't mind people guessing at your work even if it's wrong.
(Repeat this cycle about five times)
ShockDingo: So is anything new happening with this arc?
Me: Well MJ is going to die.
Dan Slott: See! This is the nonsense I'm talking about! Rage! You're all so stupid because you can't correctly guess my works of fiction and shouldn't post any theories unless you're always right all the time! More Rage!
^basically. Now I know I didn't use smileys, and the reason for this is simple: I never use smileys. This is because I both hate them and also am not a twelve year old girl. Obvious sarcasm (and this was obvious if you looked at ANY of the posts) don't need little faces making little faces for you to figure something out about the statement. You're either smart enough to understand or you're a rube (yeah I used rube, I'm bringing the word back) and therefore part of the joke. Is there a sarcasm smiley for that? Just saying.
(Yes, an emoticon.)I have a theory that Peter is going to quit being Spider-Man, move to Nashville and become a country music star.![]()
One of the best posts I've heard so far today.I think you ALL need to take it down a notch and stop giving this place a negative vibe. This is the internet folks, it has no bearing on your life once you step outside your front door. Keep it as what it is, a fun escape from real life problems and act accordingly.
You know I felt should have been Venom from the very beginning? Lance Bannon. After all, here was a character who was already depicted as being Peter Parker's polar opposite and was a rival photographer and neither of them liked each other much already. Eddie Brock, even though Peter supposedly knew him, was character the readers never heard of prior to this and who--unlike the symbiote--had a weak motivation for hating Spider-Man (seriously, he's angry at Spidey caught the real Sin-Eater and, unknowingly, embarrassed him because he got the story wrong about who the Sin-Eater was).
I agree. Flash Thompson being the new Venom is probably of the most exciting, clever, and interesting developments to happen to both characters in long time.
Yeah... Lance Bannon would have been an EXCELLANT choice for Venom, and would have given ASM # 300 an even grittier edge...
![]()
Star? You think he's going to get that far? (Damn unintentional rhymes.) I don't think Peter has the cahones to sing in front of a crowd. :P
Dude, honestly...you're starting to sound like a complete tool. Do you realize how hard it is to actually convey tone over the internet? That's what emoticons are for. So what if Slott comes on and tries to clear things up and do a bit of rumor control before it gets out of hand. You'll probably use the defense "IT WAS A THEORY! MORE RAGE!" Theory's become rumors on the internet and this one was talked about for how many pages?. Since you're not a twelve year old girl and CLEARLY hold yourself above most people on this forum you should realize that. And we should be so blessed as to have someone who's actually important in the marvel community to come on and clarify a few things for us. Do you realize how often that happens? Again, you should realize that. Dear LORD The past few pages of this thread have been complete HELL to people who actually WANT to have an actual conversation about 'The Amazing Spider-man' comics. And no. It's not just Slott who's getting people angry. It's you and ANYONE else who spits off at the mouth. Yeah, Including me. Because I'm not a twelve year old girl and I am smart enough to realize this, but you definitely seem like you need someone to actually say something to you. So there it is.
Nowww....
Anybody want to talk about what's happening in the comics currently? Preferably about Eddie Brock and Flash, this is something that's been on my mind (And probably everyone else's) but say Flash still is venom...anyone have any theories, preferably something fresh, as to what's going to happen to Brock? Personally...if one of them HAS to become powerless...I hate to say it but...maybe Brock's time is up.(Yes, an emoticon.)
Heeeey, unintentional rhymes are fun.Star? You think he's going to get that far? (Damn unintentional rhymes.) I don't think Peter has the cahones to sing in front of a crowd. :P
t: