- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
- Messages
- 18,447
- Reaction score
- 23,590
- Points
- 103
There was a public screening of the PT near in LA. It was at a dump.
Are you sure that wasn't just because they found the blu-rays someone threw away?
There was a public screening of the PT near in LA. It was at a dump.
Natalie Portman says Star Wars hurt her acting career
[YT]/K5MeGIP43EA[/YT]
I will never take the fans who turned their back on George Lucas seriously. Just plain ungrateful.
Too many people take constructive criticism as some sort of personal affront to their livelihood.
By the same token, too many people take subpar movies as some sort of personal affront to their childhood and can never seem to let it go. The wheel goes round and round...
Yeah, as much as I dislike the prequels as the special editions holding on to the hatred and letting it curdle into bitterness is just wrong. My love of Star Wars goes deep and I understand to a degree the severity of the disappointment but there's never a good reason to hate.
ROTS takes place 3 years after AOTC plenty of time for Jedi to become adept at aerial combat especially considering they already have heightened senses and reflexes and they already know how to fly prior to AOTC.
When exactly was Obi supposed to fly around in ANH? Nothing in that film leads us to believe he is encapable of flying.
The reasons for Palpatine's kidnapping are pretty obvious. He (acting as Sidious) told Grievous to kidnap Palpatine and to use Palpatine as hostage. It is a war after all. High profile targets especially the leader of the galactic empire are invaluable leverage. But the alterior motivation behind it was to get Obi-Wan and Anikan back from the outer rim (Anikan says to Padme that "had the Chancellor not been kidnapped I dont think they would have ever brought me back from the Outer Rim.") and to set-up a situation for Anakin to kill Dooku. All this is spelled out in the film.
And its meant to show the amount of control Sidious has over this whole thing. He is playing everyone like puppets.
TPM didn't do anything to Jake Lloyd. Bullies did.Look what TPM did to Jake Lloyd.
That's personal preference that he's entitled to. And Natalie Portman's career isn't dictated by a single movie, but by people who don't take to her because of their dislike for it.Liam Neeson openly talking about his unenjoyment working on TPM that Lucas dubbed Neesons Voice with another actor in a cut scene with Yoda in ROTS.
Natalie Portman was quoted as saying STAR WARS almost killed her Carreer.
Fans didn't make him wealthy. He put out a product that people liked and bought. That's what made him wealthy.A lot of let down fans told off by Lucas that these movies are not for them. ( but in reality for children to buy STAR WARS Toys.) Thats cold hearted thing to say to people who made him wealthy.
None of that came from the prequels. It came from people. People choose to react a certain way. Whether it's the fans or Lucas.Just Toxic stuff came out of the Prequels. Lucas
Constant remarks about the fans, suing fans for editing his prequels. So much awfulness derived from the Prequels that Lucas wanted nothing to do with STAR WARS or his fans again so he Sold it to Disney.
They established that Luke was a pilot too. The movie contradicts itself there. Any problem the prequels have the originals have.But they established that they had enough money TO BUY ANOTHER SHIP....
Obi Wan being a fighter pilot completely contradicts this part of the film.
What endures for the critics and their lay associates, for aesthetes who live for the beauty and the pleasure of movies, is Lucas’s directing—of two films, “Attack of the Clones” and, especially, “Revenge of the Sith.” If Lucas had done nothing else in his life, he’d have an honored place in my personal pantheon for that work.
“Empire” and “Jedi” had nothing parodistic; their absurd earnestness and the bombastic banality of their direction (by Irvin Kershner and Richard Marquand, respectively) are a perfect match for the oppressive, hectoring John Williams scores that accompanied them.
This peculiar contradiction began to resolve itself with the pleasures of “Attack of the Clones.” There, Lucas’s force awakens. The movie’s rich-hued palette alone is a jolt from the start, and the movie’s action scenes have an alluring, entrancing kinetic vigor and texture.
If I had seen “Revenge of the Sith” in real time, in a theatre upon its release, in 2005, I think that, at the moment when Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid), sizzling in the blue lightning that Mace Windu (Samuel L. Jackson) reflects back at him, cries out to Anakin (Hayden Christensen), “Power! Unlimited Power!,” I would have leaped out of my seat yelling with excitement.
Obi-Wan’s light-sabre fight with the four-armed Grievous, and, above all, the apocalyptic inferno of the confrontation of Obi-Wan and Anakin (which, regrettably, cuts back to Yoda and Emperor, a much duller battle). I watched these sequences over and over—happily, with the sound off to get rid of the musical score—and was repeatedly and unflaggingly amazed by Lucas’s precise, dynamic, wildly imaginative direction.