Wolvieboy17
Anthropomorphic Clock
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2006
- Messages
- 12,061
- Reaction score
- 922
- Points
- 73
Son of Coul has killed men for saying less
Yes.is that the whole thing?
I'd love to see Thanos being The Emperor Palpatine of the movie with the invaders acting as multiple Darth Vaders.
I'll say this: Listen to Poni.


Do anyone still think Coulson(Son of Coul) is a Shrull?
I think the whole Coulson is Mahr-Vell thing is a real possibility.
Walter Lawson --> Phillip Lawson --> Phillip Coulson
Someone should check and see if 'coul' means 'law' is some foreign language.
I'll say it a third time, it absolutely will not be the Inhumans.
They have no reasonable connection to the Avengers, no motivation for destroying New York/the Earth, and are too clearly defined as characters to be minor villains that will definitely not be fleshed out in any way.

I think the whole Coulson is Mahr-Vell thing is a real possibility.
Walter Lawson --> Phillip Lawson --> Phillip Coulson
Someone should check and see if 'coul' means 'law' is some foreign language.

I don't know why there is so much damn secrecy about who the villians are, especially when we are a month or two away from filming being finished? It's kind of odd, and a tad annoying when we've got people supposedly with inside knowledge but are constantly vague and coy when they discuss the subject.
I don't get why this is made out to be a national security top secret. Even Nolan revealed that Bane and Catwoman are going to be in his next Batman movie after awhile, but Marvel Studios still won't freaking tell us who the Avengers are going up against.


Well, just as long as Coulson still remains a good guy, then I'd be happy with whoever he could potentially ever turn out to be if there was a character twist.
Sorry, I'll use pictures since words are clearly confusing...
![]()
was inspired by this...
![]()
which came from this
.![]()
All these things trace back to visual depictions of Norse gods.
Why, were you trying to be a pedantic, smart arse *****e and pull the old "Um, well, H'actually, um, the Norse warrios TECHNICALLY didn't have horned helmets, so, um TECHNICALLY, you're teh wrong!"
That armour only exists in fantasy, sorry.I'm talking design motifs, the concept and theme of that type of armor exists and therefore is a valid 'motif' for costume design.
t:and also... to be fair..
Known Skrulls
-Anelle
-Ethan Edwards
-Hulkling
-Jazinda
-Captain Marvel (Khn'nr)
-Super-Skrull (Kl'rt)
-Pagon
-Kly'bn
-Lyja
-
-Paibok
-Rl'nnd
-John the Skrull
-Titannus
-Effigy
-Veranke
-Warpriest Kh'oja
-Xavin
-Crusader

You've posted fantasy art that is based on fantasy art. Vikings never had horns on their helmets, and this myth is a hard one to demystify when so many people have come to believe the fantasy over the reality.
The visual depictions you refer to belong to a bronze age neolithic people who once lived in what is now the south of Sweden. They were not the Norse. They predated the Norse by thousands of years.
I've built a helmet myself, and have a shield and long scramasaex to match it, have trained with and against a variety of 6th to 12th century arms and armour, and I can't be any more clear when I say putting a pair of handlebars onto a helmet just doesn't work. The idea of a helmet is to protect the head and that's why helmets of the later Viking period, running into Norman equipment, started becoming conical - To deflect an overhead blow to one side. It doesn't help the design to add 'weapon catchers' on the sides.
That armour only exists in fantasy, sorry.t:
I'll say this: Listen to Poni.
t:I'd love to see Thanos being The Emperor Palpatine of the movie with the invaders acting as multiple Darth Vaders. Cap & Hulk take on the shocktroops, Thor goes after Loki and then Tony & Fury make their way to the throne room where the mad titan awaits... gives me chills.
I also wouldn't hang on every word Poni says, like he's a leaked script, because he's a comic/film/games blogger. He reports whatever he's told. He may well know what is actually happening now, but several things that have been written on DailyBlam then get debunked. I think it was only a few months ago he was telling us the Skrulls were the main bad guy, now he's downgraded it to "I told you they'd get 'mentioned'."
The Avengers: Apparently, Chris Hemsworth (Thor), ScarJo (Black Widow) & crew are doing some rehearsals.
Actually, it was Devin Faraci:
http://www.badassdigest.com/2011/03/03/and-the-avengers-will-be-fighting
Finally!
Also, I leave the thread yesterday afternoon and this place explodes. Without going back through 15 pages, have we come to an agreement on who the enemies are?

The reason Coulson is in these movies is cause its a cheap way of having a consistant character in each movie to conect the universe. They would probablt love it to have been fury evertime but them you have to pay Jackson. Honestly i dont understand all the Coulson love. What has he done to be thought of as so cool. He just a standard government guy. I mean I like the Character but I dont really want him having much more then a few minutes of screen time. Less then he had in Thor Cause as far as im concerned anything he does I would prefer to see Fury Hawkeye or Black widow do