Crimson King
Superhero Novelista
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2006
- Messages
- 5,918
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Exactly.
Why would SHIELD & Stark allow Cap to fight the re-emerged HYDRA by himself?
No, just no.
You're assuming they're on good terms after Avengers.
Exactly.
Why would SHIELD & Stark allow Cap to fight the re-emerged HYDRA by himself?
No, just no.
Also, it's likely that the threat in the solo movies will be personal to the hero. They're not going to whip out the cell phone to take care of things like that. It's their problem and they'll deal with it.
You're assuming they're on good terms after Avengers.
You're assuming they're on good terms after Avengers.
So because SHIELD might be giving Cap the silent treatment they shouldn't aid him in his battle against an organization that will most definitely seek world domination?
Common, man.
It just doesn't make any sense.
Fury: "Steve doesn't need our help. This is personal for him. The fate of the world may rest in his hands & we could probably help, but we won't. That's The Avengers Code. No helping individual heroes with personal enemies."
Cap might not want their help. Maybe he doesn't like their methods. There are a hundred different ways you could explain it away logically.
Why is it assumed that Marvel won't address this issue in subsequent movies? They're too smart not to. Hell, Shane Black already talked about it being explained in IM3.
I know I'm not saying they won't attempt it. I'm curious as to how they go about it.
Cap's modern supporting cast is composed almost entirely of SHIELD agents. I don't know why someone would assume he won't be remaining heavily involved with SHIELD
Feige has already spoken of doing Doctor Strange, the Guardians of the Galaxy and other heroes.
Poni_Boy didn't you see the movie, why are you saying you don't know if Hulk talks or not?
Probably not. Reviewers may have a problem with it if its left unexplained though. Not that I care.Do people think really think that the GA is gonna go:
"You know the absence of CAP and HAWKEYE in this IRON MAN movie is really disturbing me and disrupting my suspension of disbeleief. I'm going to walk out now and not see any more of these movies."
It's hard enough seeing two completely CG characters go to town on each other (and I, personally, perfer linebacker Hulk over le puffy Hulk).

That's not what I'm really talking about. I mean pushing the envelope on even more unsung heroes.
Do people think really think that the GA is gonna go:
"You know the absence of CAP and HAWKEYE in this IRON MAN movie is really disturbing me and disrupting my suspension of disbeleief. I'm going to walk out now and not see any more of these movies."
Do people think really think that the GA is gonna go:
"You know the absence of CAP and HAWKEYE in this IRON MAN movie is really disturbing me and disrupting my suspension of disbeleief. I'm going to walk out now and not see any more of these movies."
I don't know about you guys, but I think the best way for them to branch off the already established heroes back into their solo properties is for The Avengers team to disassemble at the end of the movie. That would alleviate any shadow of a doubt why the team isn't hanging out together all the time. Maybe they have a hard time being a government sanctioned operation.
I'm not sure it gets more unsung than Guardians of the Galaxy. That's a huge risk for them.
Yeah, I don't see that movie happening any time soon. Maybe it's just me.
I mean the likes of Excalibur or the Defenders. Other movies that have a "team" motif. Hell, I'll even take a West Coast Avengers movie with War Machine and Hawkeye as the two familiar faces.