The Batman Reboot Casting Thread - Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cage is amazing. He's over the top, but i never understand the hate. He's a great actor IMO who has done a LOAD of horrible movies lol. He was geared up to play Scarecrow in the 90s but that fell apart obviously, but i wouldnt mind him returning as an older Scarecrow, or Clayface in the reboot.
 
Nah, I do like him. Mostly for his bad movies than his good ones lol
 
If Cage got the role, whenever Clayface was going to turn into another person, I would want him to say "I want to take his face... off."
 
i feel like a lot of names for superhero roles repeat. Cavill was up for Superman and Batman right? One leftover name from the last Superman casting was Joe Manganiello.

I doubt Cavill would have been up for Batman, he would have only been 21 during the casting process. But he was up for Ratner's Superman, got the part, was kept for a while when Flyby became Superman Returns, but was gotten rid of. He auditioned for James Bond, and came second and he was then labelled "The Unluckiest Man in Hollywood".
 
You know...that guy where he was doing that thing, remember? Where he was doing this, and it involved him doing that? You know? He's a guy, where he like does things? You know?

He's like only so obvious.
 
I doubt Cavill would have been up for Batman, he would have only been 21 during the casting process. But he was up for Ratner's Superman, got the part, was kept for a while when Flyby became Superman Returns, but was gotten rid of. He auditioned for James Bond, and came second and he was then labelled "The Unluckiest Man in Hollywood".

I'm fairly certain he auditioned for Batman in BB. Not saying he was close though.
 
jgl-nightwing.jpeg


:o

http://www.yidio.com/news/see-poster-joseph-gordon-levitts-unlikely-batman-sequel-nightwing-6900
 
I rather like it, and I don't see what's so "hokey" about it compared to him ripping his hand off to make other Clayfaces.

Which is your favorite Clayface?
As much as I don't want the monster I like the depth TAS went with Clayface as a character. I would love to see something close to Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Thing in terms of us not knowing who's a Clayface. Batman going out to investigate Clayfaces could be downright Blade Runnerish.

As a look I would want something like a melting man that has to mold his face.
 
didn't want to start another topic so,

David Cronenberg: Those who say Dark Knight Rises is "supreme cinema art...[don't] know what the **** they're talking about."

David, you've done drama and horror. Some fairly formidable directors have branched out into superhero movies pretty beautifully —is that something you would consider doing?
DC: I don't think they are making them an elevated art form. I think it's still Batman running around in a stupid cape. I just don't think it's elevated. Christopher Nolan's best movie is "Memento," and that is an interesting movie. I don't think his Batman movies are half as interesting though they're 20 million times the expense. What he is doing is some very interesting technical stuff, which, you know, he's shooting IMAX and in 3-D. That's really tricky and difficult to do. I read about it in "American Cinematography Magazine," and technically, that's all very interesting. The movie, to me, they're mostly boring.
Do you think the subject matter prohibits the elevated art form?
DC: Absolutely. Anybody who works in the studio system has got 20 studio people sitting on his head at every moment, and they have no respect, and there's no…it doesn't matter how successful you've been. And obviously Nolan has been very successful. He's got a lot of power, relatively speaking. But he doesn't really have power.
So that's a no.
DC: I would say that's a no, you know. And the problem is you gotta… as I say, you can do some interesting, maybe unexpected things. And certainly, I've made the horror films and people say, "Can you make a horror film also an art film?" And I would say, "Yeah, I think you can."
But a superhero movie, by definition, you know, it's comic book. It's for kids. It's adolescent in its core. That has always been its appeal, and I think people who are saying, you know, "Dark Knight Rises" is, you know, supreme cinema art," I don't think they know what the f**k they're talking about.
Having determined that they're utterly pedestrian, is that something you would ever do, Robert?
DC: As an actor, I would play Batman.
RP: Actors always think they can elevate anything. The worse the script is, the more an actor is like… I mean, it's funny, you read the worst script ever, and you'll talk to everyone, and go… I always talk to my agents and I got sent this thing the other day, and they're like, "Oh my God, this is the worst thing ever." But really, like, it was basically only one character, you're like, "I don't know. I think I could do something with this."
I'd never get offered [a superhero role]. I'm not buff enough [laughs].
DC: Rob, it's okay. They put you in a funny suit. You don't have to be buff.




http://www.nextmovie.com/blog/robert-pattinson-david-cronenberg-cosmopolis-interview


:pal: what a snob.
 
Blah blah blah I'm an old fart blah blah look at me throw another movie under the bus while promoting myself blah blah please don't let this teen romance breakup overshadow my film blah blah blah
 
Clayface coming off cool in a Batman movie? I dont know, i dont buy it. I gotta see it to believe it.

Id be more into the idea of the next director/s adapting the bigger villains first. Ones that Nolan left behind from the comics. A cameo from Clayface or a movie about him after 3 to 4 films? OK no problem.

Do i prefer lesser characters like Strange, Hush, Black Mask, Killer Croc and Clayface coming into the reboot before WB regurgitates the rogues that Nolans used?? Actually, yes. So maybe Clayface before the next Joker could be cool. But still..not for a while. And Clayface would have to undergo some kind of change for me to enjoy it. I dont want to see Sandman 2.0

Oh and Cronenberg is an idiot snob. His movies are the epitome of boring when you compare them to Nolans Batman trilogy.
 
Last edited:
Hey, that's the man's opinion. Agree or not, you can't deny his body of work. I ain't gonna start calling his work **** because I disagree, because it ain't.
 
Nor am I. In terms of his body of work, he's great. He just also happens to sound like a bitter old man.

Alan Moore knows a thing or two about that.
 
Didnt use the word ****. And OK "the epitome" is not true lol....but I said theyre boring compared to Nolans bat-flicks. And thats my opinion.

I love The Fly and Eastern Promises. i like a couple of others from him too but ive seen a lot from him that IMO were boring. His opinion, but i dont see why he had to say that. It sounds snobby when he lumps Nolans with the others like every single CBM is exactly the same.
 
I love Cronenberg but was anyone really calling the Batman films supreme cinema art? I mean compared to most of the other trash released during the summer yeah I suppose so. But the Batman films have always been meant to be summer popcorn flicks they are just extremely well done and set a high bar so they may come off that way when you are comparing them to things like Transformers 8: The Quest for Blah Blah Blah featuring hot model and Twilight: Breaking Awful part 5.

And boring? No Cronenberg...just no. I know you tend to center your films around the sexual/ perverse nature of humans which yes...does make them more interesting. But Batman isn't really all about that. Apples and oranges.
 
Last edited:
Nolan has without a doubt elevated the idea of what a summer blockbuster can be with inception and of course The Dark Knight Trilogy.

I mean without nolan we'd be living in a world with michael bay as the king of the summer blockbuster.
 
"supreme cinema art" accounts for a very VERY small amount of movies, like 2001 or something. I'd like to hear what the definition on that is.
 
I know he's been brought up before, but I still think Matt Bomer would make a good Bruce Wayne / Batman.
 
One of our insiders here on the board casually alluded to why someone like Bomer wouldn't get a lead role like that. He's out.
 
I think Cronenberg is mad because his comic book movie (A History of Violence, which is very good) didn't light the world on fire like Nolan's Batman movies did. He definitely comes across as a total *****e in that interview. Pattinson, however, actually comes across pretty well.
 
One of our insiders here on the board casually alluded to why someone like Bomer wouldn't get a lead role like that. He's out.

Ha. I'm enjoying how much the double meaning is applicable to your statement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,327
Messages
22,086,615
Members
45,885
Latest member
RadioactiveMan
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"