Man, can you write....please excuse me for not quoting, as that was quite a bit.
I think that both Ross' had an unrealistic motivation [if that is fair to say], but they were just manifested in different ways.
You pointed out that Hurt's Ross was unrealistic in his pursuit of trying to capture and hunt down the Hulk, even after the Super Soldier program was put on hold.
However, it is my opinion that Hurt's Ross wanting to capture the Hulk for testing in hopes of harnessing the power, reviving the SS program, and adding to his military career and resume is better motivation than that of Elliot's.
Elliot's Ross, though very well portrayed, motivation lied in his hatred for David Banner which was passed along to Bruce.
So both had an obsession, it was just focused on different subjects; thus, producing different emotions in relations to the characters sought upon.
I do not believe that Hurt's Ross receiving the nickname "Thunderbolt" was simply because he was a prick, but rather because he was a leader commanding and earning respect from fellow soldiers, he as a pro at his job, and he unlike Elliot's Ross or that we saw, was a leader and warrior in the field and respected for his military prowess similar to Cl. Custard or StoneWall Jackson.
Making the film a suspense thriller/action is not a bad idea IMO, if done right. It should not be a psychological journey into the deep human psyche for expressing the inner conflict between contemporary man and his struggle to resist a repressed animalistic behavior lacking conscience for a sociopathic intent.
Although the HULK is an adaptation of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde for Marvel, I think Marvel should stay away from relating the two on screen and in literature. Though, the Hulk takes many elements straight from Dr. J & Mr. H, the distinction is seen in the fundamental principles of the two. One is an killer and the other is an Anti-Hero.
That is why I think the Hulk should [if at all] be placed in the Action-Adventure category with elements of suspense, human psycho-reflection, drama, romance, etc. But the main component should be that of Action. I am looking at this from a writer/movie-goer/ and comic enthusiast perspective.
Comic movies are meant to be box-office adaptations, with elements as I described. The problem with making them deeper than what they are or taking them into the realm of suspense/thriller is that it makes it hard to build a franchise off of them, and they become very grossly analyzed to various forms of literature in which they are derived and adapted from themselves.
Yes, I want to see conflict in Banner, I want to see his struggle with the inner beast, but I do not want it to be so explicit and obvious of an interpretation personified in his outward projection, as for me the common man to identify with.
I get it! The Hulk lies within all of us, but it is Banner's Hulk that becomes uncontrollable and materialized. WE DO NOT need a full movie that overstates this point.
Ang's HULK played with this format, and received mixed review. I enjoyed his adaptation. I to be honest, do not like it when movies solely go off the comics, [though it may have sounded like I did]. What I do not like to see is when movies "water down" characters rather than intensify their attributes and characteristics. This is why I love to see about characters coming to life. It is their actions that speak louder than words and you can only really get a sense of this through film.
However, Ang went too far into the analysis of his characters, and did not use a proper genre that would have helped to either develop or unravel his characters as the story unfolded. He kept it in the middle while going for a psycho-analysis of human morale and emotion. This is where I believe the movie receives much of its mixed reviews and characters like Elliot's Ross do little to achieve their full potential. If Ang had used a plot device, as you so eloquently have used, to direct our perspectives in relating our emotions to a category [for lack of a better word] than I think their could have been a far better appreciation for the type of film he was trying to create. If he had made the movie more suspenseful and a conflicting human moral vs. animal survival allegory with a suspense-action undertone then I think the movie would have done far better for his interpretation of the HULK. But he instead let the characters move the story, rather than the action, which in this case couldn't have worked because Bruce is just coming to terms with his transformation into the Hulk, and his personal conflict has not been fully recognized yet.
In TIH and Iron Man the characters move the story, because they must. Audiences love to see RDJ, they appreciated Norton/Banner growing as a person and trying to control is anger, much to the effect of Bill Bixby caring the story of the series and having more screen time than Ferrigno. Thus making TIH's characters more interesting to watch.
This is why Iron Man worked so well, and has done so great in Box Offices. People went to see Iron Man and his theatrics, but loved and adore RDJ's performance and theatrics when not in the suit equally if not more. RDJ moved the story, he was interesting as h*ll outside of the suit. This is a great example of developing a character and making audiences appreciate the growth, while at the same time not neglecting the action, drama, story, and genre in which it is to relate.
Also, to say that Hurt's Ross did not show his paternal instincts is, far fetch. He showed his care and love for Betty three times if not more. Yes, there are times we hear differently from him, but those are just words in respect to her. You have to read between the lines. He does not want to hurt her or see her in danger, but he will do almost anything to Capture his "white wale", or at least make her believe that.
Touching on what I just mention. Hurt's Ross can be seen to have the motivation of Capt. Ahab in his pursuit of his great white trophy which has eluded him for so long. Keep in mind that Hurt has been after him for years, while Elliot has really just crossed paths with the Hulk. Hurt's motivation has been strengthened by time, but has weakend his morals.
If this isn't a classic human universal theme then I do not know what is.
And last we do not see the HULK in TIH kill anyone! We hear about it from Ross, and newspaper clippings, but as we all know media has its way of relating the truth for their own benefit. It is just like in the comics or cartoons, where we see the Hulk called to rescue, let's say children in this example by saving them from a burning house. The Hulk rips open a fire hydrogen and uses the water to sooth the fire. The kids are saved, YAY HULK.
However, the media reports that the "mindless" Hulk has called thousands of dollars to the city, with no respect to the environment and people that may be affected.
See it is all in the perspective and who benefits from what. WE DON'T See the HUlk kill anyone. Yeah he kicks the crap out of Blonsky, But 1)Blonsky was trying his hardest to annoy, hurt, and force the HULK into a trap. As well the Hulk knew that he was no ordinary human by his theatrics, and probably figured the kick though fatal would more or less teach the punk a lesson. Please do not underestimate the HULK or group him into the category of mindless, merciless, killing machine.
This is what Wendigo, Abomination, and other "evil" monsters are for, not HULK.
We do not know if Hurt/Ross was telling the truth behind the Hulk sightings and crimes or if he was simply giving motivation to the soldiers to treat the Hulk as a dangerous ruthless target. Think Fugitive; everyone thought he killed his wife, it was reported that he did and that he was a dangerous suspect, but he in fact was not.
Finally, I do not see Hurt's Ross as "evil", though to me he is the antagonist. This is not a contradiction, just an exception to the basis. Abomination is the manifestation of Hurt/Ross' evil coupled with Blonsky's.
Hurt is the catalyst. He is the sword of the military, and is the unseen exploit in which the military operates behind closed doors and hidden from public knowledge.
Yes, I enjoy seeing the military in a protective state ensuring our safeties, but at the same time we have seen many military movies in that regards. In TIH we become aware of the secrets the military, our military, doesn't want spoken and seen; and the effects of what happens when they become uncontrollable.
And to be quite honest my interaction with the Hulk has mainly been through animations, more so than comics.