souvlaki
Superhero
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2003
- Messages
- 5,795
- Reaction score
- 817
- Points
- 103
Yes, everywhere is saying it. Hillary quitting on Friday.
Yep... just announced on MSNBC. And she's endorsing him to boot. Crap... good show, Hillary.
Yes, everywhere is saying it. Hillary quitting on Friday.
You act as if Obama is somehow entitled to these votes.
But Obama has ways to remedey this. He can try talking to those voters instead of talking down to them behind their backs (bitter-gate, anyone?).
He can bring Clinton onto his ticket. He can stop ignoring the blue collar vote. There are plenty of ways to remedey the situation. The buck stops with Obama, not Clinton.
The "Dream ticket," in my opinion has become a nightmare ticket...
but at this point, I'm not sure Obama has another choice.
I don't know, I feel that she shouldn't be the VP only cause of Bill. With the news going on about him mostly all the time it'd just be more bagage for Obama to be associated with.
I think maybe someone like Edwards should be the VP.
Bill's just one of the reasons she shouldn't be VP.
That would be great.
From her actions within the primaries to her general reactions to his campaign she has been a constant source of hatred, entitlement and never ending one-up-manship. Any chance she had of being VP she lost in the numerous mistakes there. She simply hasn't earned to be in Obama's good graces, she deserves to be ignored not enabled.
They won't like it, of course but if they are loyal Democrats it shouldn't matter.
I don't like Hillary. i already had beef with her and after introducing herself as the next president of the united states, and referring to herself as the better candidate, the one with the most votes, and saying she'd be the better president, AFTER Obama clinched the nominatin is just an insult to the entire party. He won. She should have been gracious, instead of trying to paint herself as superior to our nominee. And she only has the popular vote if you count Michigian where Obama didn't get any votes at all, because his name wasn't on the ballot. Yeah I'd win too, if I had nobody to run against.
She's turned her supporters against our partys nominee, and now the only possible way to prevent them from voting for McCain out of spite, is to put her on the ticket as VP. It's gross, it's sickening, and I don't like it, but it's the only way. I support Clinton for VP.
Count towards what exactly?Michigan was reinstated by the DNC Spider. Those votes should count.
The popular vote does not get you the nomination. It only influences the superdelegates, and in this instance it would be immoral to conosider the popular vote of either Florida or Michigain. You don't allow voters to sit at home, and candidates to take their name off the ballot under the false pretense that their votes wont count, and then say "sike, fooled ya" afterwards. She only won the dishonest, unfair popular vote. In the honest popular vote which includes only elections done fairly according to procedure, he whooped her ass. To say were only going to count votes cast by Hillary supporters and NONE of the votes casted by Obama's supporters is dishonest. It's a highway robbery of democracy. I guess that's what they mean when they say this is still a Republic and not a Democracy. The overwhelming majority of voters who voted uncommitted said they were Obama supporters. Had they had the option to vote for their candidate, than Obama would be winning the popular vote, even if you included MI. And who knows what would have happened had voters not been told their vote wouldn't have counted.
The DNC reinstated the delegates. That has no bearing on whether or not the votes need to be recognized or considered by anybody. It doesn't. Why would anybody care what the vote was in an unfair election? You know Saddam Hussein always won his popular vote too. That doesn't mean that most of Iraq's citizens supported his presidency.
I know it wont. Hillary is counting on that. That is why she did not even congratualte him yet on his victory. She's going to try and blackmale him. If she gets what she wants, than she will try to bring her supporters over to his camp. This is just another example of old politics. It's dirty and downright awful. No possible way I will vote for her in 2012, or 2016. She comes first and her party comes second. I have never, seen a candidate lose so sorely in my life. Even John Kerry congratulated Bush, the next day. Yet Hillary has not congratulated Obama, even though she knew he was the nominee for months now.Hillary and her supporters are also party of the Democratic Party. And let's not forget they just happen to be the OTHER HALF of that party. And ill-will on the Clinton campaign side stems from the Obama campaign, and vice versa. There has been a rift for quite some time. It's not going to go away just because Obama gained the nomination.
QUOTE]
Count towards what exactly?Michigan was reinstated by the DNC Spider. Those votes should count.
I don't like Hillary. i already had beef with her and after introducing herself as the next president of the united states, and referring to herself as the better candidate, the one with the most votes, and saying she'd be the better president, AFTER Obama clinched the nominatin is just an insult to the entire party. He won. She should have been gracious, instead of trying to paint herself as superior to our nominee. And she only has the popular vote if you count Michigian where Obama didn't get any votes at all, because his name wasn't on the ballot. Yeah I'd win too, if I had nobody to run against.
She's turned her supporters against our partys nominee, and now the only possible way to prevent them from voting for McCain out of spite, is to put her on the ticket as VP. It's gross, it's sickening, and I don't like it, but it's the only way. I support Clinton for VP.
I, too, have never witnessed a candidate, do the things that Ill Hill has attempted, in terms of wildly obvious smearing and, as well, as, other things.
Well, if Clinton would be the VP, I'd actually consider going out and voting for Obama. But, as of now I don't plan on voting for either side as Obama and McCain just don't do much for me. So, I think Obama would have a better chance of winning with Clinton as his VP.
There is only one policy, difference between them. Obama will do what is necessary to prevent another Iraq debacle, and HIllary wont, just as she did not before.
I, too, have never witnessed a candidate, do the things that Ill Hill has attempted, in terms of wildly obvious smearing and, as well, as, other things.
Pandering is a part of politics. And Obama has already done his fair share of it. The point is that Obama may have no other choice than to put Clinton on the ticket in order to unify the party.
A Clinton concession is not going to automatically throw all of her supporters behind Obama. I think to suggest that it would is ridiculous.