Kane52630
Bring Me To Life Evanescence.mp3
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2009
- Messages
- 123,232
- Reaction score
- 62,365
- Points
- 218
Those photos aren't even to scale. Cavill is sized much bigger (his feet are off the bottom of the image) despite being shorter.Side by side. To my eyes David looks as big or maybe even bigger than Henry.
To say otherwise is just trolling at this point.
View attachment 139348
The other benefit to David's structure is that he can hide his physique better in street clothes since he isn't as reliant on just muscle mass to look the part. Cavill's Clark Kent disguise was laughable. He looked like he was going to burst out of his sport coat at any second:
![]()
Ahem... Batmania '89It seems to me that WB has never promoted a Superhero movie as much as Superman. Or Is it because there is more social media coverage nowadays. I remember Ben and Henry on the NBA telecast when BVS came out but it didn’t have the same fanfare.
Ahem... Batmania '89
The Dark Knight was pretty big too. I remember all the Joker cos play.i was there to experience batmania '89.
it was wild. there was so much excitement building up for it.
i honestly don't think there has been anything as hyped and as huge since then.
i was there opening night - at oakland's iconic grand lake theater. the line stretched down a few blocks from what i remember.
it was one of the biggest lasting memories i have.
superman '25 feels like it's going to be a huge pop culture event as well, but still not on that level that batman '89 was.
somehow social media has oddly made everything feel smaller now.
The Dark Knight was pretty big too. I remember all the Joker cos play.
Not to forget Spider-Man 2002 outside of Warner Brosoh yea for sure, that was probably the next biggest one next to batman '89.
they were really savvy with utilizing the internet and social media for that ARG.
engagement levels over 9000!
![]()
peter sarsgaard redeemed himself by playing gil couson in the batman
DC style redemption.
like edi gathegi gonna get redemption as mr. terrific for his role as darwin in xmen first class. haha
The cult keeps comparing Superman to Guardians of the Galaxy. So you never know.Speaking of The Dark Knight. One thing that gives me hope for this film’s quality is that while we’ve heard that WB is very confident in it, I haven’t heard anyone liken it to The Dark Knight in anyway. WB always seems to do that whenever they have a turd on their hands. I remember some comments about BvS and (I think) The Flash where they claimed it was the next TDK or something. Perhaps the worst example was some suit at WB claiming that Peter Sarsgaard’s Hector Hammond in Green Lantern was on the level of Heath Ledger’s Joker.
Exactly. It was good irony. In trying to be less silly, it becomes more so.What is even the point of him wearing glasses of he's not going to try to do anything to distinguish his Clark from his Superman? It just makes the glasses disguises all the more silly
Well, Guardians of the Galaxy is brilliant , spawned a beloved trilogy and turned niche Marvel characters into A-listers. Cool! It's not the L they think it is lol