I've been debating whether I should watch the movie again in cinemas, but some parts I don't necessarily want to sit through again.
I've been watching a lot of YouTube reactions of the movie since its Amazon digital release. It's not out on Amazon Prime Japan yet.
After my fourth screen viewing, I like it much better. Coincidentally, I watched Man of Steel in cinemas 4 times when it came out in 2013, and honestly, Man of Steel didn't get that much better per viewing. I think in hindsight, Superman 2025 is better even though I somewhat prefer the tone of Man of Steel to a certain extent.
With Man of Steel, as divisive and flawed as it was, it had elements I liked. Man of Steel had more epic moments. It had a serious tone, albeit, too dark to where it felt like the film was almost anti-humor because there wasn't enough humor in it. Jimmy Olsen could have provided balance for MOS. Well there's too much to mention about what was wrong with Man of Steel. It was a very divisive movie--I think most people can agree on that.
One thing Man of Steel lacked whereas Superman 2025 excelled was Superman's character development. Snyder didn't do enough to develop the character. Making Clark consistently silent (mostly) throughout the Snyder trilogy was a mistake. That being said though, I liked Henry Cavill. Also, I preferred the suit. Everyone has their preference.
Even after my 4th viewing of Gunn's Superman, and watching some YouTube reactors, I still firmly believe the film could have been better with a slightly longer runtime. 15-20 minutes. The bottom line was I think Lex Luthor's plot to falsely accuse Superman happened too soon. We were just cheering for Superman after the Kaiju battle, with the kids excited-and then oh-we see the message: "Superman sent on mission to destroy us". I think a few more scenes of Clark Kent at the Daily Planet couldn't have hurt. More Perry. A scene with Superman and Jimmy. Superman taking Lois out in the sky to have a picnic. (I was thinking of that JLU episode)
I like David Corenswet fine. His dialogue with Luthor at the end was slightly cringe for me. If it was Christopher Reeve portraying it, I think he would have done it differently. Or think of George Newbern. Corenswet sounded slightly whiny like a teenager in the movie--sometimes. Going into the next film, I hope Corenswet portrays Superman as a little more confident. I think Corenswet deserves a better suit though.
Tonally the film feels more like a kids movie. Superman: The Movie by contrast felt more serious. It treated the material seriously, but not too seriously. It had the right balance. With Gunn, I don't want Superman to be seen as silly or a joke in spite of the fact that Superman wears tights and trunks. As I said, I think the suit, while the idea of it looking silly, because Superman doesn't want to scare children--while well-intended, the bagginess and the trunks were more on-the-nose than any previous takes since 1978's Superman. I think the suit should be adjusted. I think that brief moment we had of Superman beating Ultraman before that 'iconic hero pose' might have been the most epic moment in the movie, followed by Superman swinging Luthor's super henchmen in the air and then blasting them with heat vision--in spite of the suit, it was pretty epic.
In the end though, I think Superman could be more grounded. I want him taken a little more seriously. I feel the jokes could be reduced to a minimum. Because let's remember, Superman is after all, cool. I still think Christopher Reeve was the best Superman. I think many people wanted a Batman-Nolan take on Superman, a take on What if Superman was real? While Nolan took part in it, it was ultimately Snyder's take on the character, and we didn't really get that, because Snyder's films were almost deprived of any emotional depth at all. No joy, very little Superman character development or dialogue. It was...almost a great concept that could have been...It was more focused on being dark, gritty, serious and trying to be as realistic as possible, without any joy-to which in retrospect, The Dark Knight trilogy, actually was joyful.
Watching Peacemaker season 2 recently, the tone almost feels the same (with the exception of the adult jokes, drugs and nudity) which is a slight problem for me.
And looking at all this, I'm expecting and hoping 'Lanterns' will be more serious, but I'm worried it could be all non-stop jokes and gags with Guy Gardner in the series, which is the last thing I would expect. I think superhero movies or TV series can be great when they're serious. The Dark Knight trilogy, Netflix/MCU's Daredevil, the Russo Brothers MCU films, Black Panther...