Sure, well, I'll continue to have no problems playing games at 30 fps anyway, but thanks for letting me know.
Your point was anything but obvious. But defining it here I can sort of see where your later posts are hinting at it. You really should've been clearer, because I really didn't get what you were trying to say, especially with those first two posts.
But it "washes" fine? I don't know what that means.
But here's the problem: it is opinion. Like I said, I have not said that there isn't a difference between 30 fps and 60 fps. That was never in dispute. This is definitely the part where the central point of your argument becomes very unclear. I am saying it doesn't make a huge difference, and I don't feel it's a game breaker, even that it might be better than a game that targets 60 fps and is constantly dipping. And you seem to be saying I'm not allowed to feel this way, because of the factual and technical difference between 30 and 60 fps.
You're trying to take my personal preference of something and turn it into a factual based argument. You can throw out all the condescending stuff you want about how I just can't understand the struggle due to not gaming on High End PC (this is sounding more and more like a Masta Race rant, too, by the way), but you're basically saying they are allowed their preferences, while I'm not allowed mine.
To be honest, I've seen in the past how you've drawn out arguments well after their expiration dates in other threads (the original Korra thread from the first season is one such example, bleh). I definitely feel that's what you're doing at this point, so I'm going to drop out, because I don't want this thread to regress into endless, looping arguments. If you want to look at this as white flag of defeat, that's fine.