The FFINO ZONE - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can anyone remind me what were the first signs of this project was going bad?
I remember being ok with the Trank announcement and then later being happy when the director replacement talk started.
What did he do early on that turned you off? (I'm Not talking about MBJ)
 
I always thought a reboot was bad news.

I wasn't enthusiastic about Daredevil either until it languished in development limbo and finally reverted to Marvel.
 
Can anyone remind me what were the first signs of this project was going bad?
I remember being ok with the Trank announcement and then later being happy when the director replacement talk started.
What did he do early on that turned you off? (I'm Not talking about MBJ)
Casting young and saying that it was going to be using the UFF as more of a reference were early concerns as I recall. But I think the earliest red flags that this was going to be a bad movie as opposed to a movie that fans didn't want were the involvement of Kinberg and the location of Baton Rouge (known for being a cheap location to film). Then when we had the shoots taking place basically entirely inside the studio and in a short time -- that was a flag too. And the supposed Trank twitter that disappeared. I think the first really big flag though was when we heard the rumors of how he trashed a house -- because Fox ended up addressing those.
 
Thanks Farren, I do recall that I was upset at the mention of UFF, and I hated the young casting of Ben and Reed. I know those two were pretty early. The house wrecking and the shortness of the shoot seemed a lot later though.
You are right about the change fron Canada to Baton Rouge--that obviously was pretty early.
I guess when the book gets written the timeline will be sorted out. lol.
But I know there were a couple of real early red flags that had me concerned. Obviously "blogger Domashev" was a kick in the gut.
 
Casting young and saying that it was going to be using the UFF as more of a reference were early concerns as I recall. But I think the earliest red flags that this was going to be a bad movie as opposed to a movie that fans didn't want were the involvement of Kinberg and the location of Baton Rouge (known for being a cheap location to film). Then when we had the shoots taking place basically entirely inside the studio and in a short time -- that was a flag too. And the supposed Trank twitter that disappeared. I think the first really big flag though was when we heard the rumors of how he trashed a house -- because Fox ended up addressing those.

I don't think that the first two were red flags. I think that the first red flag was Jeremy Slater being involved. Then only filming in a wearhouse. Then the look of Doom's costume. Then the reports of Trank's behavior. Then the two month delay. Then Kinberg firing Trank from Star Wars. Then the review embargo.
 
Well casting young and UFF really got me upset, but I am referring to stuff PRE-filming.
I remember even before they started shooting I was already turned off.
 
For any of the old timers here have you looked at it on HSX lately? It is dropping fast :)
 
Can anyone remind me what were the first signs of this project was going bad?
I remember being ok with the Trank announcement and then later being happy when the director replacement talk started.
What did he do early on that turned you off? (I'm Not talking about MBJ)

I think it's hard to pinpoint one moment.

I liked Trank when he was announced in 2012, but I also was concerned that he wasn't proven and I suspected Fox wanted someone young they could push around. Jeremy slater was also a complete unknown and there were numerous rewrites of the script and a very lengthy process to green-light the film after Trank was announced.

So all those things were red flags related to 'quality'.

Then around February of 2014, the cast started leaking out and, while they seemed like okay actors, they were completely wrong for the parts. And the weird thing with the cast was they were never actually announced by the studio - no press releases or official announcements, just reports from the trades that they had been signed.

Around the time of casting, we also saw the leaked synopsis that described them as being used as weapons. Trank specifically denied that on Twitter, but then the Fox lawyers made everyone take it down - leading to the question: "If it's not theirs, how can they make "intellectual property claims"?

Also around that time, production kept being pushed off. It was originally scheduled to start in March, but then it moved to April and eventually May.

At some point in there, Trank had his first mini-melt-down and his initial Twitter account disappeared.

Then as you mention, in March 2014 we had the report that the studio was looking to replace Trank completely.

In May, they reported production had started, but we couldn't see anything really happening on the ground. There were no big street closures or anything else you would expect for a large-scale production. The production came and went very quickly and quietly which seemed to point to it being a low-budget effort (and of course we knew their were no big stars, so all that led to questions about how committed the studio was to the project). Actual production went from mid-May to early July which seemed very short (in hindsight much shorter than reshoots)

Then in July, Fox didn't present so much as a logo at Comic-Con while films like BVS which opened long after FF were presenting actual clips.

In October, a Hyper from Baton Rouge sent me a private message saying Trank had been fired and was no longer working on the film. In November, rumors that there had been serious problems on set came out and there were reports that Trank showed up high, late or not at all and he trashed a house causing large amounts of damage.

In January or February, Bleeding cool reported that people within Fox were saying the film was 'a mess' and massive reshoots with rebuilt sets would be required. Some time around there, some of the first official photos started coming out and they showed terrible, drab production design with 'containment suits' that were voted by the majority of people in this forum as 'The Ugliest in Superhero Film History'.

When the first trailer came out in February, it didn't feature anything that looked like the FF, and it seemed dull and drab with no hint of a story.

In the period between the first and second trailers, we had reports from Baton Rouge that extensive reshoots were, indeed, taking place.

The second trailer showed something that looked a little more 'fun', but it was suspiciously edited and only showed very short clips. As additional clips were released, they all seemed to be variations of those same scenes, so it seemed like there was a very small amount of action and humor, but those few scenes were being used over and over again to misrepresent the film as something it wasn't. A shot of Sue laughing was used over and over again in different spots to try to make unfunny lines appear funny.

Generally speaking the promotional material looked cheap and unprofessional. None of the clips showed any drama or character interaction. We didn't see anything that lasted more than a few seconds at a time and didn't get any feel for how the actors actually interacted.

Kinberg and Trank provided a number of interviews, but they spent all that time deflecting criticism, accusing the fans of being 'unfair', talking about racial issues and just generally avoiding talking about good things related to the film.

Then the review embargo, short running time and that brings us to today - the day the box office numbers go in the book and this becomes a certified disaster.
 
Last edited:
I think it's hard to pinpoint one moment.

I liked Trank when he was announced in 2012, but I also was concerned that he wasn't proven and I suspected Fox wanted someone young they could push around. Jeremy slater was also a complete unknown and there were numerous rewrites of the script and a very lengthy process to green-light the film after Trank was announced.

So all those things were red flags related to 'quality'.

Then around February of 2014, the cast started leaking out and, while they seemed like okay actors, they were completely wrong for the parts. And the weird thing with the cast was they were never actually announced by the studio - no press releases or official announcements, just reports from the trades that they had been signed.

Around the time of casting, we also saw the leaked synopsis that described them as being used as weapons. Trank specifically denied that on Twitter, but then the Fox lawyers made everyone take it down - leading to the question: "If it's not theirs, how can they make "intellectual property claims"?

Also around that time, production kept being pushed off. It was originally scheduled to start in March, but then it moved to April and eventually May.

At some point in there, Trank had his first mini-melt-down and his initial Twitter account disappeared.

Then as you mention, in March 2014 we had the report that the studio was looking to replace Trank completely.

In May, they reported production had started, but we couldn't see anything really happening on the ground. There were no big street closures or anything else you would expect for a large-scale production. The production came and went very quickly and quietly which seemed to point to it being a low-budget effort (and of course we knew their were no big stars, so all that led to questions about how committed the studio was to the project).

Then in July, Fox didn't present so much as a logo at Comic-Con while films like BVS which opened long after FF were presenting actual clips.

In October, a Hyper from Baton Rouge sent me a private message saying Trank had been fired and was no longer working on the film. In November, rumors that there had been serious problems on set came out and there were reports that Trank showed up high, late or not at all and he trashed a house causing large amounts of damage.

In January or February, Bleeding cool reported that people within Fox were saying the film was 'a mess' and massive reshoots with rebuilt sets would be required. Some time around there, some of the first official photos started coming out and they showed terrible, drab production design with 'containment suits' that were voted by the majority of people in this forum as 'The Ugliest in Superhero Film History'.

When the first trailer came out in February, it didn't feature anything that looked like the FF, and it seemed dull and drab with no hint of a story.

The second trailer showed something that looked a little more 'fun', but it was suspiciously edited and only showed very short clips. As additional clips were released, they all seemed to be variations of those same scenes, so it seemed like there was a very small amount of action and humor, but those few scenes were being used over and over again to misrepresent the film as something it wasn't. A shot of Sue laughing was used over and over again in different spots to try to make unfunny lines appear funny.

Generally speaking the promotional material looked cheap and unprofessional. None of the clips showed any drama or character interaction. We didn't see anything that lasted more than a few seconds at a time and didn't get any feel for how the actors actually interacted.

Kinberg and Trank provided a number of interviews, but they spent all that time deflecting criticism, accusing the fans of being 'unfair', talking about racial issues and just generally avoiding talking about good things related to the film.

Then the review embargo, short running time and that brings us to today - the day the box office numbers go in the book and this becomes a certified disaster.


There was also that Baton Rouge seemed to be saying that the budget was just $100 million which if you adjust for inflation is the same as Fox's Daredevil or X-Men 1 (and its known that X-Men was heavily under-budgeted).
 
There was also that Baton Rouge seemed to be saying that the budget was just $100 million which if you adjust for inflation is the same as Fox's Daredevil or X-Men 1 (and its known that X-Men was heavily under-budgeted).

Yep, I'm sure I missed half of it, but I typed that pretty quickly off the top of my head.

Bottom line - everything seemed bad, nothing seemed good and anybody who wasn't expecting a bad film just wasn't paying attention . . . or was in complete denial.
 
Yep, I'm sure I missed half of it, but I typed that pretty quickly off the top of my head.

Bottom line - everything seemed bad, nothing seemed good and anybody who wasn't expecting a bad film just wasn't paying attention . . . or was in complete denial.

Yeah, for me it wasn't one single thing, just lots of little things that just built up to a growing sense of dread. But at the same time I kept thinking that if they pulled it off it could have been a film that the critics really embraced, grounded, darker, body horror, and something different from most CBMs etc. and in the reviews they do seem to see flashes of that which they liked.
 
Yeah, for me it wasn't one single thing, just lots of little things that just built up to a growing sense of dread. But at the same time I kept thinking that if they pulled it off it could have been a film that the critics really embraced, grounded, darker, body horror, and something different from most CBMs etc. and in the reviews they do seem to see flashes of that which they liked.

I think a lot of people felt this way, and I felt this way up until the advertising campaign.

The advertising campaign convinced me it really was bad because what we were seeing didn't look good and that was the best they had to show us.

I stopped using the qualifier 'it still might be a good film' a couple months ago.

I also think many of us were reluctant to believe it really was a bad film for the same reason people are reluctant to believe now that a deal with Marvel is all but done: It seemed too good to be true.
 
After the first trailer I thought that FFINO could be a terrible FF adaptation but a well regarded and modestly successful film. It was moody and dark, and folks tend to go for that sort of thing. But once the actors started spouting lines and we got a glimpse of the special effects - yeesh.
 
There was also that Baton Rouge seemed to be saying that the budget was just $100 million which if you adjust for inflation is the same as Fox's Daredevil or X-Men 1 (and its known that X-Men was heavily under-budgeted).

I think in hindsight Fox probably wishes they left the movie with the inexpensive $100 Mil budget, but my understanding is they went back out to do a lot of expensive reshoots to try to fix the film, which from the sound of things might have only made the film worse, if not from a quality stand point at the very least from a financial one. The whole thing is a trainwreck, but in the end lets hope the rights revert to Marvel and if so then all of this will have been worth it.

Surfer
 
Dear lord, now even Liefeld has joined the bandwagon saying the film's mostly failing because of the fans that want FF to revert.
Did Liefeld genuinely love this film or is he just defending it because he feels loyal to Fox for making Deadpool?
I do feel bad for Kebbell. He really seemed to have an enthusiasm for the character and he's a great actor. If he had a good script I am sure he would make a great Doom. He's probably feeling sad because he won't be able to play Doom the way he would like to do.

Kebbell will be fine. Kebbell is a a Real Rock N'Rolla :cwink:
 
Still wish they made the damn sequel

I'm not. If they had made the sequel then it would have most likely performed better at the Box Office and in the end been less likely Marvel could obtain the rights to these characters. Now granted it is not a forgone conclusion this will happen, but given the circumstances it seems likely there will be at the very least discussions.

Surfer
 
Why did Sue not even go on the trip with them? WHY? When that happened I just got angrier.
 
Still wish they made the damn sequel

Sorry, just realized you were talking about a different movie, not the sequel to the original Fantastic Four movies made by Fox.

Surfer
 
Sorry, just realized you were talking about a different movie, not the sequel to the original Fantastic Four movies made by Fox.

Surfer

Yeah I was about to say ha ha

But nah forget making a sequel to those
 
The film doesn't explicitly state that Victor is a blogger/hacker but his first scene... all I could think of is the Nerdy Guy from South Park who played WoW with the boys. My phones acting up so I can't post a picture but I'm sue you guys know what I'm talking about
 
Just so bad. Whoever said: "the first act gave us a taste of a movie that we never got to see" was on the money.

Screw you, Fox.

MBJ-see-flash_zpskkb44pqi.gif
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"