Joker "The Joker" in development with Todd Phillips and Martin Scorsese attached? - Part 2

Is Walsh saying there was very mixed reactions at the early screening?
 
From what I'm gathering and know, I think what he is trying to say is that if you're expecting to go see this for "The Joker" you might be disappointed because A) outside of the failed comedian thing it doesn't really borrow much from comics or other material and more of its own thing and B) The actual "Joker" bits are at the end of the third act because 80% of the movie is a character study of a broken man.
 
It definitely appears that healthiest way to look at this movie is that it takes the barest of bones in terms of The Joker we know from the Batman comics, and spins it right off into something that isn’t really about ‘The Joker’, and is more the story of a man who suffers a colossal psychotic break, and happens to adopt a clown persona due to his day job - which, in and of itself, is quite a fascinating concept, and one I will look forward to seeing.
 
Script is out there floating somewhere, not that I have read it or anything maybe...but if anyone has any questions about the film I could probably answer it :sus
 
If the film makes out The Joker to be
a heroic figure...
then that really will be bull****.

Let’s just make Jigsaw, Hannibal Lecter and Michael Myers
good guys too,
and have done with it :rolleyes:

I do like the idea that Fleck
suffers from a kind of Tourette’s syndrome that makes him laugh. That’s clever.

But the Fleck
and Bruce Wayne are brothers twist is just godawful though. Straight out of bad day time soap operas. Smacks of a ham fisted attempt to be different from Nolan’s ‘Joker as random force of nature’ approach, by tying Fleck in with Wayne at the most personal level. It’s horrible. Super hoping it’s one giant misdirect.
 
Last edited:
If the film makes out The Joker to be
a heroic figure...
then that really will be bull****.

Let’s just make Jigsaw, Hannibal Lecter and Michael Myers
good guys too,
and have done with it :rolleyes:

I do like the idea that Fleck
suffers from a kind of Tourette’s syndrome that makes him laugh. That’s clever.

But the Fleck
and Bruce Wayne are brothers twist is just godawful though. Straight out of bad day time soap operas. Smacks of a ham fisted attempt to be different from Nolan’s ‘Joker as random force of nature’ approach, by tying Fleck in with Wayne at the most personal level. It’s horrible. Super hoping it’s one giant misdirect.
You'll be happy to know that two of those things don't happen in the script
 
Expanding on his point....
If you wanna know the truth about your concerns:

Arthur is more analogous of the mass shooter of today. Someone who wants revenge against the system that treats him like trash. While you understand why he does what he does...he's not a good person.
As for the brothers thing...its a lie told by his mother. They're not brothers.
 
Expanding on his point....
If you wanna know the truth about your concerns:

Arthur is more analogous of the mass shooter of today. Someone who wants revenge against the system that treats him like trash. While you understand why he does what he does...he's not a good person.
As for the brothers thing...its a lie told by his mother. They're not brothers.

Thanks Orb :up: Good to know. I thought as much on the second thing.

The alternatives to both would have been horrendously awful. As it stands... me likey.
 
Ah... so did I read the spoiler right about
Fleck and Wayne not being brothers, and it’s just something his mother made up, because she’s nuts?

And also that he’s
not made out to be a heroic figure? The leader of an anti elite movement?
Fleck and Wayne are not brothers. The script views Fleck with a level of contempt, and he inspires a terrorist/militia movement that ends up killing a lot of prominent people. He's a mentally ill man who gets **** on a lot by life throughout the film
 
Fleck and Wayne are not brothers. The script views Fleck with a level of contempt, and he inspires a terrorist/militia movement that ends up killing a lot of prominent people. He's a mentally ill man who gets **** on a lot by life throughout the film

Sounds fine to me! What'd you think of the script?
 
Expanding on his point....
If you wanna know the truth about your concerns:

Arthur is more analogous of the mass shooter of today. Someone who wants revenge against the system that treats him like trash. While you understand why he does what he does...he's not a good person.
As for the brothers thing...its a lie told by his mother. They're not brothers.
This sounds like it's going to be a really dark and sinister character study. I love it! Just what I was expecting
 
I've always preferred the idea that Joker was always evil instead of this "broken man who snapped and had enough of the world", considering he's meant to be... Ya know, a psychopath, and psychopaths are born, not made. However, it's not like it hasn't been done before, so I'll bite my tongue once more and see how it plays out. I'm still hoping it's a little bit of both maybe, ala Walter White.
 
Or they may go with the theory that this whole story is just something he made up to tell the audience.
I'm really hoping for that as well but they seem really intent on emphasizing this "broken man " ****
 
To be honest I'm mostly interested in this just to see Phoenix's performance. He's my favorite working actor, and Amazon botched his Oscar campaign for You Were Never Really Here so bad (he deserved a nomination way more than Malek & Mortenson imo). Even if this is a divisive film I hope he can at least get awards considerations if he's as good as he's been in the past.
 
D9MqQR2U0AA5ffz.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,335
Messages
22,087,066
Members
45,887
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"