Dark Sentinel
Superhero
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Messages
- 6,998
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Everyone seems to be talking about Joker being the embodiment of the "randomness of crime". While that may be the general consensus, what if the Joker is actually the embodiment of the line between genius and insanity? Think about it: his crimes appear to be random, but in reality each one of them serves two purposes: one, to exact vengeance on high-class society (when he was working as a stand-up comic, they were the kind of people who booed him out, and so in his mind are his enemies); two, to challenge Batman.
In terms of his "random" murders, what if they aren't random at all? What if each murder has some kind of connection--however loose--to an eventual target? I'll give you three examples: Joker murders Rachel. Seemingly random (even though we expect it), but what if it was because Joker knew that Rachel and Bruce were together, and that Bruce was a contributor to Harvey Dent's campaign for DA? It serves both of his purposes. OK, in terms of a less violent crime, but no less dramatic: Joker defaces a political poster for Dent's DA campaign by splashing one side of Dent's face with Rachel's blood? (extreme? maybe, but this is Mr. J. we're talking about) It says something about Joker's intentions for Harvey and vaguely reveals that Joker knows something about Dent that not very many people know. And the Gotham National Bank robbery? Dent's political funds are stored in an account at that bank. Finally, each of these offer clues that Batman-- the Dark Knight Detective, has to piece together. All of these makes Joker the perfect opposite to Batman.
This, I think, makes the Joker a much more complex, sadistic, and above all human character. He doesn't want to take over the world, he just wants to make people laugh at his jokes. But to do that he has to remove the people who won't.
In terms of his "random" murders, what if they aren't random at all? What if each murder has some kind of connection--however loose--to an eventual target? I'll give you three examples: Joker murders Rachel. Seemingly random (even though we expect it), but what if it was because Joker knew that Rachel and Bruce were together, and that Bruce was a contributor to Harvey Dent's campaign for DA? It serves both of his purposes. OK, in terms of a less violent crime, but no less dramatic: Joker defaces a political poster for Dent's DA campaign by splashing one side of Dent's face with Rachel's blood? (extreme? maybe, but this is Mr. J. we're talking about) It says something about Joker's intentions for Harvey and vaguely reveals that Joker knows something about Dent that not very many people know. And the Gotham National Bank robbery? Dent's political funds are stored in an account at that bank. Finally, each of these offer clues that Batman-- the Dark Knight Detective, has to piece together. All of these makes Joker the perfect opposite to Batman.
This, I think, makes the Joker a much more complex, sadistic, and above all human character. He doesn't want to take over the world, he just wants to make people laugh at his jokes. But to do that he has to remove the people who won't.