DACrowe
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2000
- Messages
- 30,765
- Reaction score
- 625
- Points
- 78
....on the whole Katie thing.
Either way she was a cliché and used for different narrative devices in both materials. The comics are actually much darker and far more cynical and snarky than the film (which is saying a lot, given how sarcastic the film is). Millar openly hates emotional investment in characters and unless he is trying to handle Superman or Marvel's big guns (when he wrote for Spider-Man and wrote Civil War) he avoids it. In fact he tries to torpedo it. So, for a joke, he had the hero not get the girl. And on top of that, he had the girl's *****ebag boyfriend beet the hero up and, rather absurdly and incomprehensibly, had said girl send the hero a video of her going down on said *****ebag.
The film wanted to be subversively funny, but also highly entertaining. This included breaking taboos and showing things not normally seen in superhero movies. In this case it is the hero banging the girl's brains out. All the relationships in the Superman, Batman, Spider-Man, X-Men and Fantastic Four films are very chaste or at least are presented very sterile. Vaughn chose to torpedo that. He also wanted the film to have a kooky Superbad/Judd Apatow sense of humor. And in that, rather impossibly, the geek always gets the girl and Apatow revels in that in crude fashion. Vaughn mimicked this.
Now one can argue that the comics is a more thoughtful deconstruction of superhero clichés for the direction it took or that the film created more drama at the end by putting Dave's relationship on the line to add drama in the third act. Whichever argument is fair. But each is rather irrelevant to the overall story and to say either is a deal breaker is rather petty.
However, the changes of Big Daddy's backstory are much more crucial and major changes to the overall narrative and subtext of the piece. I personally think the deconstruction was complete from Dave Lizewski, Chris D'Armco, "some Armenian guy" and even the subtle tragedy of Mindy MaCready that Millar's last minute twist was forced and suffocatingly cynical. I personally think the film kept the meaning of the piece while improving the narrative by adding heart to Big Daddy and Hit Girl's relationship and origins.
My 2 cents on the changes.
Either way she was a cliché and used for different narrative devices in both materials. The comics are actually much darker and far more cynical and snarky than the film (which is saying a lot, given how sarcastic the film is). Millar openly hates emotional investment in characters and unless he is trying to handle Superman or Marvel's big guns (when he wrote for Spider-Man and wrote Civil War) he avoids it. In fact he tries to torpedo it. So, for a joke, he had the hero not get the girl. And on top of that, he had the girl's *****ebag boyfriend beet the hero up and, rather absurdly and incomprehensibly, had said girl send the hero a video of her going down on said *****ebag.
The film wanted to be subversively funny, but also highly entertaining. This included breaking taboos and showing things not normally seen in superhero movies. In this case it is the hero banging the girl's brains out. All the relationships in the Superman, Batman, Spider-Man, X-Men and Fantastic Four films are very chaste or at least are presented very sterile. Vaughn chose to torpedo that. He also wanted the film to have a kooky Superbad/Judd Apatow sense of humor. And in that, rather impossibly, the geek always gets the girl and Apatow revels in that in crude fashion. Vaughn mimicked this.
Now one can argue that the comics is a more thoughtful deconstruction of superhero clichés for the direction it took or that the film created more drama at the end by putting Dave's relationship on the line to add drama in the third act. Whichever argument is fair. But each is rather irrelevant to the overall story and to say either is a deal breaker is rather petty.
However, the changes of Big Daddy's backstory are much more crucial and major changes to the overall narrative and subtext of the piece. I personally think the deconstruction was complete from Dave Lizewski, Chris D'Armco, "some Armenian guy" and even the subtle tragedy of Mindy MaCready that Millar's last minute twist was forced and suffocatingly cynical. I personally think the film kept the meaning of the piece while improving the narrative by adding heart to Big Daddy and Hit Girl's relationship and origins.
My 2 cents on the changes.




