titansupes
Avenger
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2010
- Messages
- 11,626
- Reaction score
- 1,865
- Points
- 103
So you didn't watch Andor or The Acolyte. The Mando shows look like trash, but not the others. This is before we get into the animation which has all been gorgeous.To me it looks like any other Disney Star Wars project on streaming, washed-up gray slop.
As someone whose been pretty critical of the Kennedy / Disney era of Star Wars , I gotta say , I think the trailer looks like a cute family film, geared particularly at children.
Obliviously , for a Gen- Xer like me , it evokes 1980s Lucasfilms like Return Of The Jedi and Willow , so I liked the trailer .
Don't know how good the film is gonna be , but I can see the audience they're going for , which is likely children who are too young to have been involved with the toxic , polarized, SW / Culture Wars ,debates of the Twenty Teens.
The only thing that took me out of it was seeing Sigourney Weaver there , which , being a man of a certain age, I think ," Ripley" .
But it's always nice to see her , and she's good at comedy.
So, I liked the trailer .
Andor is the exception that proves the rule. Rogue One is the only Disney Star Wars movie I LOVE, so I kinda pair the two. But Mando, Boba Fett, Obi-Wan, Ashoka, Skeleton Crew, I watched them all, they are terrible television (Mando S01 is okay). And I'm sorry, but The Acolyte is by far the wooooooooooorst.So you didn't watch Andor or The Acolyte. The Mando shows look like trash, but not the others. This is before we get into the animation which has all been gorgeous.
I'm not talking about the quality of the shows/movies. Though Rogue One, trash. I'm talking about you calling it washed up gray slop. Andor, Skeleton Crew, and Acolyte don't look like that. None of the animation looks like that. So saying the streaming stuff looks all the same is just not true. The Mando stuff has a specific, cheap look. Which to be fair, isn't even gray.Andor is the exception that proves the rule. Rogue One is the only Disney Star Wars movie I LOVE, so I kinda pair the two. But Mando, Boba Fett, Ashoka, Skeleton Crew, I watched them all, they are terrible television (Mando S01 is okay). And I'm sorry, but The Acolyte is by far the wooooooooooorst.
Nah man, I swear they look flat, all three of them, especially Andor, and it's not just Star Wars, it's 99% of all streaming shows. I'm watching Dexter Resurrection, comparing it with the first seasons of the OG show, it's night and day, everything looked so vivid and alive back then. Today, shows look and taste like ashes.I'm not talking about the quality of the shows/movies. Though Rogue One, trash. I'm talking about you calling it washed up gray slop. Andor, Skeleton Crew, and Acolyte don't look like that. None of the animation looks like that. So saying the streaming stuff looks all the same is just not true. The Mando stuff has a specific, cheap look.
The trailer used pretty obvious imagery from ROTJ and Empire strikes back , evoking those films and nostalgia for the earlier SW films .
I do not know your setup or the quality in which you can stream. But this is simply not true of the shows I named. It also does not apply to a lot of genre streaming shows. In the last couple none of House of the Dragon, Wednesday, Stranger Things, The Penguin, Shogun, Fallout, Alien: Earth, or Silo would fit that description.Nah man, I swear they look flat, all three of them, especially Andor, and it's not just Star Wars, it's 99% of all streaming shows. I'm watching Dexter Resurrection, comparing it with the first seasons of the OG show, it's night and day, everything looked so vivid and alive back then. Today, shows look and taste like ashes.
Dell PC and Samsung QLED TVI do not know your setup or the quality in which you can stream.
I didn't watch all these shows, but House of the Dragon is a real downgrade compared to GOT in terms of visuals. The first thing that struck me upon initial viewing was how bland the cinematography was compared to the original show. People on Reddit also picked it up.But this is simply not true of the shows I named. It also does not apply to a lot of genre streaming shows. In the last couple none of House of the Dragon, Wednesday, Stranger Things, The Penguin, Shogun, Fallout, Alien: Earth, or Silo would fit that description.
So you don't watch most major genre streaming shows and then want to complain about how they look?Dell PC and Samsung QLED TV
I didn't watch all these shows, but House of the Dragon is a real downgrade compared to GOT in terms of visuals. The first thing that struck me upon initial viewing was how bland the cinematography was compared to the original show. People on Reddit also picked it up.
View attachment 148729
I can't watch everything. From your listing, I saw HotD, Penguin, Shogun, and the first seasons of Stranger Things. Despite being popular, some other stuff are simply not appealing to me, or I don't have time to watch them. That doesn't mean I didn't watch a sh*tton of other streaming shows that I was interested in and noticed how a lot of them look like a cat's litter box.So you don't watch most major genre streaming shows and then want to complain about how they look?
Too bad they lost their touch along the way; it happens to the best. Going from golden fields, green wildfires lighting up the screen, and blankets of snow to muted blues, pale grays, and drab stone walls.It's very odd to complain about HotD cinematography in comparison to GoT when HotD's first season was led by Miguel Sapochink and the second, Alan Taylor. Both known for their prominent roles on GoT. Especially Sapochink, who was responsible for how the show looked from s5 on and directed the Gift, Hardhome, Battle of the Bastards, Winds of Winter, The Long Night and the Bells.
I can't watch everything. From your listing, I saw HotD, Penguin, Shogun, and the first seasons of Stranger Things. Despite being popular, some other stuff are simply not appealing to me, or I don't have time to watch them. That doesn't mean I didn't watch a sh*tton of other streaming shows that I was interested in and noticed how a lot of them look like a cat's litter box.
Too bad they lost their touch along the way; it happens to the best. Going from golden fields, green wildfires lighting up the screen, and blankets of snow to muted blues, pale grays, and drab stone walls.
Let's just compare scenes: a battle in nature, armies getting decimated by a dragon.
One's gray and dull, the other is bold and vivid. The difference is crystal clear.
On top of my mind, Daredevil: Born Again, you compare the cinematography of the first season, released in 2015, with the one from the revival 10 years later, and it's striking. Without even mentioning the colors ( which were better), OG show just looked ... visually raw i n comparison.What streaming shows have you watched that "look terrible" compared to streaming shows from 2015?
The mood is tied to the narrative, and I have nothing to say about aesthetics; it's gorgeous; I'm talking about cinematography. The palette is subdued, desaturated, and dominated by muted blues, grays, and foggy tones. It's just visually boring. And it has nothing to do with the resolution, my very mid internet doesn't allow me to go beyond 1080p anyway.What exactly are you complaining about? Mood, aesthetic, or the straight up cinematography? Because how HotD is shot looks worlds better then the stuff you posted. Vhagar's battles are more arresting then anything from the original show, visually. Posting compressed YT clips with a distinct look, will always result in it looking worse. Especially when you post one show in 1080p and the other in 4K.
This is how the Batman looks on YT, compressed too hell, artifacts everywhere: