Democrats are much smarter than republicans with their smears. They have outside organizations spread lies...palin wanted to ban Harry Potter books, Palin didnt give birth to her child, mocking McCain for not being able to use a computer, the democrats wisely let others do the trash talking and then ignorance at the party level.
McCains voting record isnt nearly as devoid of votes as Obamas...Obama breaks records with his no-shows or "present" votes. I could always say that Obama isnt qualified to be president because hes never run anything in his life (except that time when he was training Acorn, who is now very adept at election fraud...good going!
McCains attacks about Ayers were wrong...and a desperate last ditch effort by a campaign that was horribly run with no message of its own.
However, I see nothing wrong with going after Obama for his relationship with his minister. That was a tight knit relationship where Obama repeatedly said that Wright was a huge influence and blah blah blah. No one (including you) believes that Obama was never there for any of those anti american rants by Wright. Its a valid thing to explore.
Now, all that aside...I think Obama is qualified to be president. He wasnt my top choice (Hillary was) but hes a smart guy and can handle it. I disagree with almost all of his policies, and Im fairly sure that (like Bush) he wont really be in charge of much and will end up as a figurehead more than anything. But as far as "can he do the job" forgetting about my personal policy beliefs, yeah, he can. Clinton did a fine job, and I disagreed with him on most issues. Bush supposedly agreed with me on most things, and hes been an outright disgrace...so there you go.