Dark Raven
It's not about what you deserve...
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2010
- Messages
- 62,002
- Reaction score
- 9,675
- Points
- 103
i'm interested in who he would have cast, back then.
He wouldn't have, as it took decades for him to finish a proper draft.

i'm interested in who he would have cast, back then.

Chris Nolan never read a Batman comic in his life and that worked out just fine. They don't have to be supernerds to make a good film.
that's what works best for me. i think that he'd be more useful to the Avengers as Giant-Man, anyways.
Ant-Man exists because of Stan Lee and Larry Lieber. it was adapted from an earlier story, in which another person was shrunken and had to fight his way out of an anthill. that character could have been anyone.
Stark created the tech that made Iron-Man possible, in the same way Pym created the tech that made Ant-Man possible. The argument that any other character could have been used to create Ant-Man can also be made with Iron-Man, since he is not the only genius engineer and inventor in the Marvel U either.could you imagine how ridiculous the hype would have gotten if, both, Paul Rudd and Joseph Gordon-Levitt had gotten roles in this movie? there'd be at least 3 different sets of fans (w/ some overlap of course) possibly interested in it.
The point is, don't put the carriage before the horse. Those of us that don't like Lang being the focus first would have had the same reaction to Rhodes being the focus of the first Iron-Man movie, Nightwing being done before Batman ever hit the silver screen, etc etc. If you don't get why that is, then there's no use in discussing the point further.
"'The idea that we have for the adaptation is to actually involve both... Henry Pym and Scott Lang. So you actually do a prologue where you see Pym as Ant-Man in action in the 60's, in sort of 'Tales to Astonish' mode basically, and then the contemporary, sort of flash-forward, is Scott Lang's story, and how he comes to acquire the suit, how he crosses paths with Henry Pym, and then, in an interesting sort of Machiavellian way, teams up with him."
I don't think Edgar's plans have changed much from this
If Wright is going to go with the dueling Ant-Men approach, then having the youthful looking but mid-40's Rudd team up with a twenty-something actor as Lang would work better than having Rudd portray the youngster in the relationship.
Was Cassie a teenager when she first debuted? I thought she was about 8 or so, especially in the issues of Iron Man. Maybe they aged her up later, but I thought she was younger. A twenty-something man could have a daughter who is 8. But I agree that Lang should be older. At least in his 30s.
But would a twentysomething actor have a teenage daughter?
I'd be willing to bet that Pym and Lang would both be in their 30s-40s.
if Rudd is Hank Pym, i wonder what the motivation is for the heist. are they using the Trish Starr/Egghead storyline?
I'm praying for a non-white Janet but I know that's just too wild for Hollywood.
I wouldn't say that. If Rashida Jones becomes Janet, you'll get your wish of a non-white Janet.