That would be valid, if we weren't getting GOTG. The whole point of that movie seems be a team or characters who AREN'T heroes, or even particularly nice people, coming together. You have two mass murderers, two irreverent thugs, and a womanizing *****e thief/outlaw. Not exactly the most "moral" of groups.
It's kind of useless to speculate when we don't know exactly what happened. People saying good riddance, or "glad he's gone" are utterly ridiculous.
Tired of all the Wright and wrong BS. Just want a director announced and the movie to go forward.
Maybe they are just finalizing the contract for whoever before they announce it.
James Gunn stated his thoughts: Some people just arent meant to be together.
what else needs to be said?
![]()

now, piss off with the trolling
is anyone as happy as me that hardcore MCU fans think that the connection and continuity of marvel movies is more important than good standalone movies?
i also noticed that its not a problem that 80% of marvel studio movies have very bad villains. its not a problem. what matters is that we get for the first time bright suits and 5 slow motion shots of out favorite superheros in ther classic pose from the comics.
in a way its the best way to make a superhero movie.![]()
I'd take Gunn's word as the closest person to the situation that has commented
but really, what's it matter?
this blame-game nonsense is getting really tiring, especially when you're all making valid points
Speculation should be on who to hire next and how to treat the story, not "he's a dick!", "no they are!!", "Repeat ad nauseam."
^^^ As an X-fan, please don't make me hate X-fans
I'd take Marvel's interconnectivity over the god-awful continuity of the X-films
I'd also take a variety of villains (who sometimes fall short) to one or two villains repeated over and over endlessly
I'd rather slo-mo shots of bright suits than black leather and bastardized power sets (and cutting away every time the action gets decent)
Not to mention that only two or three X-films have been any good as "stand-alones"
now, piss off with the trolling

If this movie gets shelved, delayed, or halted, I'd have no problem with that.
If it means getting Doctor Strange or Black Panther sooner, huzzah.
It does not mean that. It means one fewer movie during Phase 3. Movies take a long time to produce. They haven't even gotten off the ground for Doctor Strange. If Ant-Man doesn't get produced in that slot, there will just be nothing to fill that slot.
It does not mean that. It means one fewer movie during Phase 3. Movies take a long time to produce. They haven't even gotten off the ground for Doctor Strange. If Ant-Man doesn't get produced in that slot, there will just be nothing to fill that slot.
Again, from Marvel's perspective, the movie's not broken. The only person who, if rumors are true, thinks the movie in it's current state is broken is Edgar Wright. Marvel just needs a new director who will be on board with the most recent changes to the situation that Wright was not on board with. That's why they have no current plan to push it back.
If they push back, they'll lose all the people they've scheduled, including quality actors. One of the rumors is that Wright was behind schedule... why would they fire a guy for putting it behind schedule and then put it further behind schedule. If they were going to push it back, just keep Wright on.