Doctor Octopus
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2006
- Messages
- 4,421
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
Agreed. It feel a lot like Ditko era for me.
I just rewatched Spider-Man 1 the other day, and holy hell. Turns out it's been like over 2 years since the last time I watched it. And it was VERY different than I remembered it to be, can't believe I forgot so much about it. In fact, it was worse than I remembered. It wasn't bad, but it really wasn't as good as Spider-Man 2 (my favorite superhero movie of all time...)
It's gotten better for me over time. It has some problems (no Gwen, the pro wrestling scene), but it still kept pretty close to Spidey's origin. Plus, seeing Spider-man finally go toe-to-toe with his arch-nemesis on film was something for which I'd been yearning since I was a kid in the '70s. Goblin's costume wasn't perfect, but the glider, Dafoe's mannerisms/voice, the pumpkin bombs, and his attack on Peter's loved ones were just perfect. I really go back and forth on whether SM2 is better than SM1 because the difference is a hair's breadth.
What didn't you like about the pro wrestling scene?
Kirsten Dunst is looking good these days...
[YT]sbG7P7SvIY8[/YT]
It's nice to see her in a better place and she's also picking some very interesting roles/projects. I always had a soft spot for her in this trilogy, despite the hate she gets.
It was terribly dated and silly. Both sports like UFC and dangerous performances like pro wrestling are tightly regulated by law. Even in 2002, there is simply no way that a big venue in NYC would witness untrained guys getting debilitated and attacked with chairs without getting shut down by the police.
What we saw in that scene might well have happened in some run-down bar in the 1960s. However, there were several better options that could have been used when that scene was being written into a modern story.
Kirsten Dunst is looking good these days...
[YT]sbG7P7SvIY8[/YT]
It's nice to see her in a better place and she's also picking some very interesting roles/projects. I always had a soft spot for her in this trilogy, despite the hate she gets.
I don't know how she was terribly written. The film was certainly a little messy for the characters, but her character, like the others, were written fine.Yep. She quit smoking recently too. I thought she was good as MJ, her character in 3 was written terribly though.
Being cool isn't a trait I'd find to be an issue, but that's a subjective thing, no one is always confident, in the movies she had her moments, but the reality of her character background had to be dealt with and that would make someone have self-esteem issues at times, and being a rock for Peter isn't what defines her as a character. She dated four guys in a span of 3 movies, which is about 3 years. That's not unreasonable. The comic version had father issues as well, if I remember correctly. She was no more a pain than anyone else in the films.Copy that. I have no problem with her performance, but the character over the trilogy grew into something I didn't like. The MJ I knew from the comics was strong, cool, confident, and a rock for Peter.
Dunst did great with what she was given, which was the story of a girl with daddy issues, hopping from bloke to bloke, and generally being a pain in the arse.
Still love her in the first one, even if she did go from Flash to Harry to Spidey to Peter. Little loose ha.
Kirsten Dunst is looking good these days...
[YT]sbG7P7SvIY8[/YT]
Ok, I am probably the only one to say this, but I actually don't see the huge appeal for Spiderman 2, and I never have. IMO, the romantic subplot was done to unnecessary extremities, Doc Ock was "meh", and the "Spiderman no more" subplot was forgettable.
Seriously, WHERE DID ALL THIS APPEAL ORIGINATE!?!? What do you guys love so dearly about it that I am missing!?
Hate me? Good! ;D
[YT]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Avn2nT16FA[/YT]
I wanna say that Peter isn't innocent in this issue either. He spends the entire movie trying to get with an engaged woman. And in the previous movie he'd made out with his best friend's girlfriend. I'm not gonna get to other stuff because that's not relevant to the first two movies.Mary Jane is shown to have grown a lot since Spider-Man 1. She's reached her dream of being a successful actress on Broadway. She's independent. She's a star. But she has not forgotten her friends and family. Where she came from. The rift between her and Peter is well done, as she clearly yearns for him to be there for her, see her Broadway play she worked so hard to get to. Like Aunt May, MJ has a bit of spunk and toughness to her, and doesn't just come across as the helpless damsel. She gives Ock verbal guff, and even tries to smack him with a plank of wood when he's got Spidey captured. The only flaw to her character was her seeing John and trying to get with Peter at the same time. If John was not the one she really wanted then she should have ended it sooner. I understand the point of it was MJ was settling for the safe choice, rather than the one she really wanted. But it's not fair on John to be used like that. But in spite of that, when she finally chose the right guy, I think we all still cheered at the end when we got "Go get 'em tiger".
I wanna say that Peter isn't innocent in this issue either. He spends the entire movie trying to get with an engaged woman.
And in the previous movie he'd made out with his best friend's girlfriend.
God bless you both! God bless everyone in your lives!
Peter actually straight asks her out. He doesn't ask her to give them another chance until after she shoots him down.Not really. He tries to reconnect with her once after she gets engaged, and that's when he's given up being Spider-Man. And he just asks her to think about giving them another chance. If she decided yes then the onus would be on her to end her relationship with John before she starts up with Peter.
The Joker says everything I was too lazy to write.
Thank you, good sir.
Peter actually straight asks her out. He doesn't ask her to give them another chance until after she shoots him down.
Ok, I am probably the only one to say this, but I actually don't see the huge appeal for Spiderman 2, and I never have. IMO, the romantic subplot was done to unnecessary extremities, Doc Ock was "meh", and the "Spiderman no more" subplot was forgettable.
Seriously, WHERE DID ALL THIS APPEAL ORIGINATE!?!? What do you guys love so dearly about it that I am missing!? The first Spiderman, on the other hand, is solid gold in my eyes. Hate me? Good! ;D
The train fight sequence? Yea, that's pretty cool, but how come there is no love for the final fight of the first film? Just a classic, brutal punch-out with a solid emotional core to it.
Then again I also deeply enjoy Spiderman 3, prefer Age of Ultron over the first Avengers, and do not despise Godzilla 98, so who the hell am I to say anything?
The Joker, I agree that the performances were arguably the greatest in this one overall among the characters found in the whole trilogy in general. Especially Harry. However, there is nothing else that seems particularly special in my eyes about this one.
The train fight sequence? Yea, that's pretty cool, but how come there is no love for the final fight of the first film? Just a classic, brutal punch-out with a solid emotional core to it.
Then again I also deeply enjoy Spiderman 3, prefer Age of Ultron over the first Avengers, and do not despise Godzilla 98, so who the hell am I to say anything?