Keyser Soze
AW YEEEAH!
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2002
- Messages
- 21,405
- Reaction score
- 14
- Points
- 33
Nice post.
Thanks!

I agree with everything except:
- Lex isnt as smart as he thinks he is. I prefer the canon version where he is in the top 3 smartest people on earth.
I do think he'd be ranked among the 3 smartest people on Earth. When saying "he's not as smart as he thinks he is", I wasn't implying that his intelligence is limited, but rather was making a comment on his gargantuan ego, in that he probably views himself as being on a whole mental plain above even the other smartest people in the world.
- He blames Superman for his failures. I'd rather he's not a ******** crybaby, but rather obsessed with Superman and not being able to trust him like the rest of the world does. Again, canon.
I wouldn't say blaming Superman for his failures necessarily equates to ******** crybaby. And I'd say it's more canon that, rather than Luthor genuinely having the best interests of humanity at heart in his suspicion of Superman and legitimately feeling he is a threat to the world that can't be trusted, it's a rationalisation he hides behind to justify his envy of Superman and the way the world looks at him. Lex Luthor is someone who has the whole world under his fingertips, he's one of the wealthiest, most powerful men on the planet... but it's still not enough for him. There's still a void that can't be filled, and so Superman gives all his discontent a convenient physical shape. When he kills Superman, THEN he can truly attain the greatness he expects of himself...
- I never liked him being raised in Smallville. Too much of a coincidence and frankly its lazy writing. "We grew up in the same town but Lionel is responsible for my villainy. HURR." I wouldnt mind it if his parents were great people and him striving to live up to their name. But then all his good deeds go unnoticed when a flying man appears to steal his thunder. I would just like to see Lex evolve to villainy, in a "the end justifies the means" way, rather than straight up villainy. But i'd take anything over the smallville-Lionel-HURR origin.
I'm not a fan of Smallville's on-the-nose "Lionel Luthor is a Machiavellian businessman who raises a Machiavellian businessman for a son in his own image." But I did like the original Post-Crisis idea of Luthor growing up in desperate poverty in the Suicide Slums, living with abusive parents who he eventually puts out a hefty life unsurance policy out on and kills in order to become a self-made man. I like the idea that pretty much everything else Luthor subsequently did was an attempt to erase those meagre, shameful beginnings from existence. There's a real "Daniel Plainview from There Will Be Blood" vibe about that. And I liked Geoff Johns' recent retcon of shifting that impoverished, abused childhood from the Suicide Slums to Smallville, and calling his deadbeat, alcoholic father Lionel, in an attempt to tie together Luthor's various origins from over the decades.